You do know that 5 feet is 1,5 meter/150 centimetres, right?
I doubt anyone, except someone living at home, with a room only big enough for a closet and a very narrow bed only have 1,5 metres to "stretch out" in.
I think it is called hyperbole
You do know that 5 feet is 1,5 meter/150 centimetres, right?
I doubt anyone, except someone living at home, with a room only big enough for a closet and a very narrow bed only have 1,5 metres to "stretch out" in.
I think it is called hyperbole![]()
http://www.toshiba.co.jp/about/ir/en/news/20080219_03.htm
Looks like a lot of discs are going in the trash tomorrow.
And who wants to buy their DVD collection again? Not everyone has a 50" 1080p TV...
If I did have one, it would be sit beside my SegaCD, Nintendo and BetamaxI'm not sure what to do because it is rumored that they are going to completely drop all support for HD DVD. I have an HD DVD player and 20 HD DVD movies...
This is such a misconception. The only difference between MPEG-2 and AVC or VC-1 is that MPEG-2 is not as efficient (quality vs. size).
Theoretically, let's say you have a source file that when compressed with MPEG-2 takes up 20GB of a 25GB BD-R. Then, you take that same source file and compress it using AVC to take up 10GB of a 25GB BD-Ryour end result is going to be the same.
MPEG-2 itself is NOT a bad video codec, it's just not as efficient as AVC or VC-1.
Above was what I was really getting at. BD has 6 times the resolution of DVD, you would think that only increasing the bitrate by 2.5-3 or so would have poor quality.It is interesting that you basically double the bitrate (well more like 2.5x), but want like 6 times the resolution. Doesn't seem like that would end well.
No, that's still hearsay.Surely this is official now?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7252172.stm
If I did have one, it would be sit beside my SegaCD, Nintendo and Betamax
Im no stranger to losing out due to technology. I bought a PS3 (Dec 06)because of the future possibilities with games (that I love..MGS, Ratchet), I did not think much of BD until Feb last year.
Buyer beware thats all I can say.
Good, now the widespread adoption can begin, which will bring prices down![]()
Good, now the widespread adoption can begin, which will bring prices down![]()
I haven't found any information about Universal's HD DVD plans. Is it *switching* to BR or just *adding* BR support?
Universal is pretty competitive on their HD DVD pricing. With the addition of Paramount, surely Blu-ray will drop to around $20 as standard pricing.
Fox can shove their $35 new release Blu-ray discs. Ridiculous even with the 10 % Amazon discount that was supposed to expire two months ago.![]()
After today's announcement - there's not going to be any "Blu-ray" price drops. No more competition, so they can call the price shots. Expect all $35 Blu-ray releases here on out....
After today's announcement - there's not going to be any "Blu-ray" price drops. No more competition, so they can call the price shots. Expect all $35 Blu-ray releases here on out....
Yeah there's not this market leader known as DVD to compete with or anything.![]()
havent bought a DVD in 3 years (way before BD existed). never will. got Transformers for Xmas (thanks sis).Yeah there's not this market leader known as DVD to compete with or anything.![]()
Yeah there's not this market leader known as DVD to compete with or anything.![]()
DVD falls way short of 1080p - Blu-ray has no other competition...
You get what you pay for...
After today's announcement - there's not going to be any "Blu-ray" price drops. No more competition, so they can call the price shots. Expect all $35 Blu-ray releases here on out....