Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If the battery spec was say 2000mh, but your one came with 2100ma, 105% would be correct no? If it isn't baselining against the expected capacity, how will it know how much wear and tear it has? If our laptop brand new came with an 1800mh battery (which would warrant an immediate return), would you be happy for it to report it as 100%, because that is how it started?
Uhmm we are talking about 102% health not charge!!
But then again, it was in bold...I WAS NOT SERIOUS!
Chill out you and that guy against Trump :p (so much anger for what?)
 
Last edited:
Uhmm we are talking about 102% health not charge!!
But then again, it was in bold...I WAS NOT SERIOUS!
Chill out you and that guy against Trump :p (so much anger for what?)
The health is regarding the charge capacity... What did you think it was referring to? Whether it needed to see a doctor?

And what anger :rolleyes:, you seemed like a confused person through and through.

Yes, your first sentence was in bold and let's pretend you was not serious - but you also followed that up with
"Yes yes I know , theoretical vs real, still doesn't make sense.."
So I thought I'd clarify.
 
The computers have as advertised battery life for light usage up to 10 hours. But on heavy usage it goes down quicker than the older model because the battery is physically smaller. But people dont understand that and think those 10 hours is what they should always get



I just sold my 2015 rMBP which was also a 15". Using PS and Lightroom the battery on the touch bar beats the old machine. Obviously, with video work, the new machine could be less.


R.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDColorado
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.