I have been asking for that for nine years, so speak for yourself.Adding limited touch to MacBooks is useless, nobody is asking for that.
I hope that don't include this on every Mac and just have a separate Mac for touch screen.Just looking at that picture is giving me ergonomic anxiety
And it’s not just young people.Why do people have such trouble understanding that young people expect to be able to touch screens when they feel like it?
The market is not all about you and your preferences/biases until the end of time.
Why do people have such trouble understanding that young people expect to be able to touch screens when they feel like it?
The market is not all about you and your preferences/biases until the end of time.
There's people who would get excited if the Macbook Pro would feel more like an iPad? I want the iPad to feel more like a Macbook.
What the people you mentioned want, is not a half-baked solution. They want a real usable touch device running MacOS. This is not it. Something like an iPad that runs full MacOs, not a MacBook with limited touch where you need to keep your arm in the air until you get shoulder injuries.I have been asking for that for nine years, so speak for yourself.
Gotta love when someone has to come in like “it’s useless, it’s bad, Steve Jobs would never, Tim crook, wah wah wah”…
Without thinking of the dozens of accessibility benefits, the hundreds of new applications that can be built, and the millions of phone and tablet first consumers who would feel *quite a bit more* at home with a touchscreen as a secondary input.
You think that produces anxiety?Just looking at that picture is giving me ergonomic anxiety
Why do people have such trouble understanding that young people expect to be able to touch screens when they feel like it?
The market is not all about you and your preferences/biases until the end of time.
Which is exactly why Apple has said “screw it, take both”.I've been using a Mac for decades now and an iPad for a year. Combine that with some other trying to use touch PC's and there's one thing clear: there's practically no application that works perfect for both touch and traditional keyboard/mouse use.
They better not do a windows and screw the UI up to make bits of it "touch friendly".
If they do that it'll push me over the edge entirely onto Linux. I'm already about 50% there.
That was purposefully built hardware with added complexity, that's why it got cancelled. And it did replace something, the function keys row which many people missed.IMO, this feels like the “Touch Bar” all over again, which is to say useless and close to being an anti-feature.