Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'd quite like one of these for my Mac Studio. I under-specced the internal storage because I didn't understand the difference in performance between internal SSDs and external ones.(Only got a 1TB drive instead of a 2TB one, and couldn't amend my order once it was under way, without going to the back of the queue and not seeing my new computer until mid-June). A Thunderbolt connected NVME external SSD would be faster, sure, but a quasi-built in 1TB would probably serve my day-to-day needs OK. I agree the price of this seems high though.
Why would it need to be built in on a desktop machine? External drives aren't that large...
 
$250 for a 1TB SD card that only writes 75MB/s? What are they smoking? You can get a 1TB Samsung T7 external USB 3.2 that does nearly 1000 MB/s writes for less than half the cost. Yeah it won't sit flush in your Max like an SD card but they're tiny and unobtrusive nonetheless.
That's the Novelty Introductory Price. It should eventually drop in price depending on demand and competition.
 
SD cards are only used in the very low end consumer DSLRs that are on their way out as people are buying smartphones instead and have been for a decade. The most common format after CF Express is XQD followed by CF. CF is used in the Canon 5-series until the R5 which switched to CF express. SD is often also provided on some lower end bodies as a backup card slot instead of dual CF Express. But that slows down the cameras write speed and if I did have a camera with SD I would still want to transfer from the CF Express card at 1700 MB/s instead of then under 250 MB/s of the fastest SD card via the built in reader. Though both my cameras are dual CF Express and all my future cameras will be CF Express or CF Express 2.0 so the SD slot will never be used by me nor most professional photographers and videographers.
The whole situation is ridiculous. Easily 95%+ of Mac users never touch memory cards. Of the hobbyists and professionals that do, their needs are all over the place.

When the card readers were removed from Macbooks, the folks who still needed card readers had to carry card readers around. That made sense. Now people who don't need card readers are carrying card readers around, and folks who DO, it's often the wrong type! Outstanding.
 
The whole situation is ridiculous. Easily 95%+ of Mac users never touch memory cards. Of the hobbyists and professionals that do, their needs are all over the place.

When the card readers were removed from Macbooks, the folks who still needed card readers had to carry card readers around. That made sense. Now people who don't need card readers are carrying card readers around, and folks who DO, it's often the wrong type! Outstanding.
Even the first time round professionals that may have used SD and not CF at the time where also using an external reader because the internal one on the MB and MBP of the time was so infuriatingly slow compared to even a £10 external USB 2.0 reader. My reader of that era was a FW800 for CF cards. I did have a backup Canon D500 which used SD and for that I ether plugged in via USB 2.0 or used an external reader since both options where significantly faster than using the internal SD slot on the MB.

Edit: also the SD slot on the studio is even more daft. A front 3.5mm port would have been far more welcome as something you might want easy access too.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: maxoakland
Speed is very less compared to internal SSD but very cheap to expand storage. Can use to keep photo library probably
 
…it won't sit flush in your Max like an SD card…

This worth a lot to many in certain situations. I hate moving around with a cabled SSD. Here, form can matter more than (or as much as) function. Or, form actually plays a huge functional role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jace88
This is another reason why the MBP should have had a CF Express slot instead of SD. Not only would it be more forward looking but devices like this could operate at far faster speeds and reliability.

1. I'm assuming a CF Express slot would have made the laptop thicker.
2. Are CF Express cards used anywhere outside of photography? SD is ubiquitous.
 
I had these 10 years ago. They were OKAY back then.

Today it's pathetic Apple is stuck with a crappy SD port and we're still talking 50MB/s. It's absolutely unusuable for 1TB
 
certainly not as fast as internal, but definitely can be used as a media solution where speed is not the essence.
I use one in my 2015 MacBook Pro for offloading the complete Logic Pro sound library and some other audio related things and it is works like a charm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ilikewhey
I use one in my 2015 MacBook Pro for offloading the complete Logic Pro sound library and some other audio related things and it is works like a charm.
likewise, i use it on my 2015 mbp as well, its a cheap and doable solution without going in and swapping out the ssd. even more imperative now consider the ssd in modern mb are soldered.
 
Is this a joke?
If you are going to buy external storage which you can insert inside the machine, for photos, why not buy an SD card?
I don't get it.
 
I learned quick that shelling out the extra cash for higher internal storage is well worth it if you keep your computer for more than a minute. As someone who works with large files a lot, I don't know what I would actually use this for. Those R/W speeds are quite low. Maybe for other documents and smaller files, but for anything larger than 1GB, hard to say that's worth using. I'd rather carry at T5, T7 or Sandisk Extreme Pro with me and plug it in when needed.
 
SD cards are only used in the very low end consumer DSLRs that are on their way out as people are buying smartphones instead and have been for a decade.
Just looking at what's on sale, I wouldn't call (for example) the £2900 Canon EOS 5D mk IV (SD and CF - not CF Express) or the £3600 Nikon Z7 II (CF Express and SD) "very low-end" even if they're not the very latest bleeding edge professional option... and that's picking a couple of models at random, I haven't trawled through dozens and cherry-picked the ones with SD. Anyway, people will have existing mid/high-end DSLRs - they're certainly not things that existing users are going to throw away overnight. As I said, Apple made the mistake of assuming that everybody would rush out and buy all-new peripherals with the latest interfaces for their new Macs in 2016.

...and I don't know how many times it has to be repeated before it registers but SD cards are used in a lot of other things than pro DSLRs. If you want to download pictures from your drone, dashcam, sports cam - or program your Raspberry Pi etc. then a CFExpress slot is as much use as an inflatable dartboard. Or, if you're using a phone for photography, if it's using a memory card at all it will be SD. I'm not a pro photographer, will probably never buy anything with CFExpress but I do have a bunch of devices that use SD or microSD.
 
Okay, but it blocks the slot for SD cards. Especially for videos and photos, a large storage is necessary, so I either have to connect an SD card reader via USB C or take the data via the diversions of the SSD of the Macbook.
I also find it very expensive, I bought a 2TB Sabrent Rockt XTRM Q as a storage expansion for 330 €, it has significantly higher write and read speeds than what Transcend offers there.
 
If you are going to buy external storage which you can insert inside the machine, for photos, why not buy an SD card?
This is an SD card. Its just been explicitly designed so that it fits flush with the case on a MacBook Pro and be left plugged in semi-permanently, whereas a regular SD card would stick out and get damaged. You're paying a premium for something designed specifically for a MacBook rather than a generic mass-market device - but 1TB SD cards aren't that cheap if you ignore the obvious fakes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: prometheus12
An SD card is EXTERNAL storage to the system and shows up as such on the macOS desktop.
Completely irrelevant. The point is that it fits flush with the side of the MacBook so you can leave it plugged in semi-permanently - a regular SD card would protrude, leaving a pen drive sticking out or an external SSD dangling from a cable is a recipe for damaging your USB-C ports.
 
The Mac Studio proves that removing consumer upgradeable storage is NOT to save anything in dimensions, it is to try force users to pay their exorbitant upgrade prices. Which of course many people can't afford/won't do, which means that they are pushed to solutions such as 75MB/s SD cards...
It's ********.
Even Apple shareholders must see that this is something that keeps switchers away from Macs, and creates a worse user experience all around when users are pushed to external hacks for storage - which, incidentally, creates no revenue for Apple at all. This situation is just thoroughly bad.
Just more of Apples anti consumer ways that so many drink up and try and justify. The thing is Apple creates everything from the ground up, so there is no reason for anything to be closed off, unserviceable, non upgradeable. It is purely because it brings in billions. No excuses when you design the case and all internal components.

I like the idea of this sd drive for the sd card slot. Not a fast speed but nicer then an external if you simply want storage and not something you work off. I will probably add one at some point to store work files. Any live jobs get moved over the main drive anyways. Of course could be cheaper but the simplicity of nothing sticking out, always connected without anything dangling is great.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.