Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.

edesignuk

Moderator emeritus
Original poster
Mar 25, 2002
19,232
2
London, England
A 16-year-old Argentine girl has given birth to female triplets - for the second time.

The girl, named only as Pamela, had her first set of female triplets aged 15, having first given birth to a son when she was just 14.
BBC.

16 years old. 1 son + 2 x sets of triplets = 7 kids at 16!

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
 
They're getting support from the government because the daughter can't stop sleeping around?
 
The government should have provided birth control instead of donate land and house.

By giving out freebies, it won't be surprising if more teenagers in that region will get pregnant in an attempt to get free land and free house.
 
it's sad that being a little slut and getting yourself knocked up is a career move these days. "oh, the government will sort me out" :rolleyes:

(yes I am a judgemental bitch, I'm sick of these little tarts with their big greedy open hands, among other things, looking to make the responsible people of the world pay their way in life. I just love forking over extortionate prices on council tax so little skanks can milk their way into housing and raise a generation of delinquents.)

</grumpy harsh generalization>
 
They're getting support from the government because the daughter can't stop sleeping around?

Welcome to America!

No, wait...

It's common for the poor women in the US to be forced to have more children by their husbands/boyfriends so they receive more welfare from the government. There are cases of fathers/grandparents/uncles fathering children for this purpose. In my hometown, you sometimes never know who the father is.
 
What iBlue said.

There was a similar case around here where 2 girls did it, and then demanded the Council put them up. The community responded by telling them where to go in no uncertain terms.
 
You support the mother to help the children. If you refuse to help them out you're punishing the wrong people. It may not send out the right message but would you honestly subject a child to abject poverty to make a point. Have you got a better idea?
 
Wow, thats all I gotta say. Well, that's what she get's for not using a condom but there mostly Catholic over there right?
 
I live in a highly religious town and I don't see teens popping out babies left and right.

Teenage pregnancy has more to do with a general decline of the community not religiousness or religion. A tight-nit community/family is always better than father government. Personally, I would take her kids and sterilize her, problem solved. But then everyone would scream Nazi.
 
Teenage pregnancy has more to do with a general decline of the community not religiousness or religion. A tight-nit community/family is always better than father government. Personally, I would take her kids and sterilize her, problem solved. But then everyone would scream Nazi.

I agree with all of your points.

and in Eastern Europe during the Cold War is was not that uncommon to do exactly that, if a woman was not a fit parent, after third pregnancy she was sterilized.

I would take the kids away from her, and make sure she could not breed anymore.
or find the biological fathers and make them pay for child support.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.