Warning: After reading this, you will think I'm a heartless bitch. I don't care.
You're right, I do.
Sorry. I disagree. I absolutely think the children should be subject to abject poverty to avoid rewarding this stupid slut. She will probably not teach these kids right from wrong (because obviously *she* doesn't know), so they're going to grow up to be poor or in prison, anyway - so might as well let them have that life from the beginning. Really, children need to learn at a young age that if you want to eat, you better get off your lazy, free-loading arse and get a friggin' job! They also need to learn that if you're a stupid slut, abject poverty is all you and your bastard children deserve.
Name calling isn't a form of argument.
Seriously, if I don't work, I starve to death.
No you don't. You'd be on welfare. Or would you voluntarily starve yourself to death rather than accept the help?
Boo hoo. If I don't have a job, I *deserve* to starve to death.
Do stay-at-home moms deserve to starve to death? Define "having a job".
*All* lazy people deserve to die. So what? Anyone who pities the lazy or the slutty is a moron! The *only* acceptable solution to all these stupid sluts around the world is to take their children away and sterilize them. There is no other choice that is fair to people who deserve to live (you know, those of us with *jobs* who pay taxes!)! Oh, yeah, her parents should be jailed (for life) and have any other children they have taken away for not teaching her right from wrong and for not keeping her slutty arse in line. I mean really, does no one understand what parenting means, anymore?
Because only stupid sluts get pregnant at a young age, right? Color me a moron then. I've seen girls pressured to have sex before. I've seen people you would call lazy who have crippling disabilities. Yet you think all those people should be killed?
I am *so* sick and tired of people on welfare. They all need to die! I work my butt off, and these losers get to stay home all day making bastard babies? They're all a waste of oxygen, and their children will never be any better. Give the bastard babies to people who deserve to have children, and kill the lazy mother f'ers on welfare. That would end a *lot* of the problems in the world. Why should we feel sorry for, or be willing to help people who can't take responsibility for their own actions? It's *their* problem, not ours!
How would you propose to kill them? Lethal injection? Or would you be willing to use the knife on a pregnant 13 year old yourself? Should we do these executions publicly, the better to spread the word of fear among the potential "stupid sluts" out there? And what punishment, if any, would you advocate for the father? Does he get killed too?
Sorry if that sounds harsh, but life isn't fair, and it *shouldn't* be. What's the point of doing the right thing or being responsible if we're going to allow people to take the easy way out in life? Survival of the fittest. I'm not a communist. I should not be forced to share the fruits of my labor with anyone. For there to be affluent people, there must be poor people, and we have the power to choose which group we're in by how hard we're willing to work. Work or die. If you can't afford babies, keep your slutty legs closed! The end.
The point of doing the right thing or being responsible is to be better off than those who do not. Just because I advocate helping people for the sake of staving off higher future costs doesn't mean I want to provide golden palaces or a lifetime of indolence for anyone. Their life should be harder than yours or mine. But harder doesn't mean dead, and it doesn't mean they should have nothing and live in the streets.
I also note that, in classic Libertarian fashion, you have neglected to include the costs of doing what you propose in your analysis. What does it cost to keep someone on welfare? $1,000 a month? It costs twice that to keep them in prison. It costs the business community untold dollars when the homeless camp out in front of their shops and panhandle. It costs the health care system untold dollars when someone without insurance goes to the emergency room for something that could have been handled easily and cheaply prior to their ER visit.
You advocate an extremely black and white view of the world; yet the world often comes in shades of grey.
Now, who can tell I have PMS right now?
I told you that you would think I'm a heartless bitch, and I still don't care.
And what's up with the references to Catholicism denouncing birth control (leads to hell fire and damnation...)? If you're really Catholic, surely you would remember the nuns pounding it into your heads that being a slut gets you the same punishment, so really, that is no excuse for all the bastard babies!
Yeah, you'd think telling people not to do something would be a guarantee that they wouldn't do it -- in a black-and-white world anyway. Funny though, the real world doesn't work the way Ayn Rand said it would.
I completely agree taking children from their parents because the parents are poor is wrong, however the bad judgement thing is an entirely different story. Bad judgement whether it is unprotected sex or driving stupidly is still bad judgement. If I was given a choice of live with my biological parents and risk being killed by my parents bad judgement or live in a foster home, I personally would pick the foster home.
And what would you pick if you were given that choice at 2 hours of age?
But your great great grandmother raised her children how many years ago? What was the life expectancy?
I hardly think this slut from Argentina had the same concerns as your great great grandmother.
Again, what's with the namecalling? Is a girl a slut if she has sex with three different men? And is there any proof that she has done so? I didn't see any in the referenced article. Perhaps you have some information the BBC doesn't? They mention her "alleged promiscuity". Is that proof?
The level of mysogeny in this thread is disturbing.
