Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
View attachment 1703050


Biden's biggest rally drew less than three dozen.

I know who won.

You know who won.

Trump knows he won.

He's not going anywhere.
The sentiment is scary, both from you and the person you’re responding to. “Lock them up” shouldn’t be the default stance. “You” didn’t win anything...neither did “I” and it’s nobody’s inauguration but the country’s.

Also, “million make America great again march” is a terrible name.
 
Why is Russia our adversary? The cold war ended decades ago. Russia's GDP is 1/60th of USA's, and they are now the 11th ranked country by GDP, they simply aren't even in the game anymore.

If China isn't the USA's greatest adversary, then the USA doesn't even have one at the moment. I think the game is to work with China, not against them so bluntly. But to not be naive, as of course they'd love to topple the USA and become the dominant power in the world. And also don't be so naive to think that that will not have a lot of negative and unpleasant consequences.

I hope our officials do take China seriously. But GDP is not the only measure of competition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: indiansfanzz
That's if election fraud actually becomes President.

---

Also this is a shame, President Trump has done so much to help improve the country and people still want to put a stop to this. It's really disappointing that that the obvious (to some) good that you do had to be fought every step of the way to be put into action.

---

This topic has been tagged as political talk being allowed here.
3Pq6zec.jpg
Huh? :oops:
 
What reason is there to ban Instagram though? Is it simply because you don't like the platform?
It’s bad for this generation. Horrible really. Having people to look up to with Instagram will and has made this world bad in the last 5-10 years.
 
I don't exactly think you're in the target age group.
I grew up with social media in my 20’s and watched what it did to people so no you’re wrong. There is good social media and then there is toxic social media. You don’t have to agree but the world is changed not for the better. Dating is completely horrible nowadays. Girls looking up to fake people wearing nothing in pictures. Selling their bodies. Living fake lives. Yes it has changed the world. Instagram is one of the worst out there for kids these days.
 
I grew up with social media in my 20’s and watched what it did to people so no you’re wrong. There is good social media and then there is toxic social media. You don’t have to agree but the world is changed not for the better. Dating is completely horrible nowadays. Girls looking up to fake people wearing nothing in pictures. Selling their bodies. Living fake lives. Yes it has changed the world. Instagram is one of the worst out there for kids these days.
I wonder if MacRumors falls under that category.
 
It's really disappointing that that the obvious (to some) good that you do had to be fought every step of the way to be put into action.
As my Trump-voting father would say, “That’s politics, babe.”

As Biden-voting me would say, “That’s the core problem with a two-party system.”
 
For sure, but it's a good starting point for working out how powerful a country is.
But that’s different from saying that, because their GDP has slipped relative to other countries, Russia “isn’t even in the game anymore.” From a strictly security standpoint it’s obvious that Russia must remain towards the top of our national security threat list.

I’m also not trying to quibble about ranking our “most adversarial,” and am totally open to distrust of and distaste towards China.
 
I wonder if MacRumors falls under that category.
Why would they? You obviously don’t understand the two if you think a forum ruined anything in the world. Completely different. Forums have been around since the late 90’s.
 
Trump supporters will reject every legitimate poll out there, but try and use rally attendance during a pandemic to proclaim the "true" outcome of the election. He'll hang around on Twitter for sure. But at least he'll no longer have the presidential powers he was never qualified to yield in the first place.

The polls said Hillary would easily win Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. The polls have been just as wrong or worse since 2016 and not only here, in Europe as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The polls said Hillary would easily win Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. The polls have been just as wrong or worse since 2016 and not only here, in Europe as well.
Thanks for reminding me. In addition to not understanding how the electoral college works, many Trump supporters also seem to have trouble understanding how polling and probability works too. RCP aggregates a bunch of different polls and had Clinton up by an an average of 3.2 points going into election night. She won the popular vote by 2.1 points, of course not securing enough electoral votes to win. That's absolutely within a reasonable margin of error.

Also, if a probability model projected that Clinton had a 60-40 chance to win, it doesn't mean that the model and whatever calculations were used to determine it, were wrong. That's not how it works. There's a reason that Trump's victory is considered a political upset. Pennsylvania for instance hadn't voted red since 1988. Many models, despite what you said, did in fact take 2016 into account and predict this previous election more accurately. But then of course if you're willing throw millions of votes away due to fraud that no proof can be provided of then you're probably not interested in how accurately the election was predicted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.