Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
artSnippetControl.gif


Paywall.
 
The WSJ articles, the Photostream icon, the leaked case designs and just by the competition (Samsung Galaxy, Droid Bionic etc), I am almost certain there will be an iPhone 5.

If the iPhone 4S is the only phone that is announced, it will be a disappointment to consumers looking for Apples competition to Android and Windows Phones.

Tim Cook will start off with a bang by introducing the iPhone 5 and having a FaceTime convo with Steve!
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

I got to read the important stuff for free. While I've all but completely lost hope in a redesign - it is surprising that Apple wouldn't tell a reputible publication like the WSJ to stop building up hope if it doesn't exist.
 
This is the most important part:

"Apple Inc. is expected to unveil Tuesday the newest version of a device that has helped bolster the company's fortunes more than any other in recent years: the iPhone.

General expectations for what has widely and unofficially been dubbed the iPhone 5 are for a slimmer device with a larger touch screen, an improved camera and a relatively speedy chip of the same variety found in the current version of Apple's iPad tablet. There also has been some speculation about possible voice-command capability."

No, it's not a controlled leak, but it's also not a controlled denial. If Apple didn't want people to expect a bigger screen, WSJ would know.
 
This is the most important part:

"Apple Inc. is expected to unveil Tuesday the newest version of a device that has helped bolster the company's fortunes more than any other in recent years: the iPhone.

General expectations for what has widely and unofficially been dubbed the iPhone 5 are for a slimmer device with a larger touch screen, an improved camera and a relatively speedy chip of the same variety found in the current version of Apple's iPad tablet. There also has been some speculation about possible voice-command capability."

No, it's not a controlled leak, but it's also not a controlled denial. If Apple didn't want people to expect a bigger screen, WSJ would know.

How is more speculation "important"?
 
Because it's the Wall Street Journal. You know what they print has some weight. I'm not quoting another BGR post or anything here.

Right... but the Wall Street Journal spouting speculation is still just... speculation.

If the WSJ knows something, they actually write it.
 
Right... but the Wall Street Journal spouting speculation is still just... speculation.

If the WSJ knows something, they actually write it.

This is the time when every blogger/reporter comes out with their last minute speculation/guesses so that once Apple makes their announcement tomorrow, anyone who is close to being accurate can claim they knew all along and for future events claim to have "Better Source's", which will result in more page clicks to their site.

This is why BGR and WSJ have been getting more coverage this time around.

Why Gene Munster, an analyst at Piper Jaffray, continues to grab headlines is beyond me. I don't think he's ever been right.
 
Why are those the only two options? Why can't it just be a generic summary news piece, which is exactly what it sounds like?

Because, again, if Apple wanted us to think there would be no chassis redesign, AllthingsD or the WSJ (same thing) would be notified. Apple almost never allows unreasonable rumors to persist through to the day of the event.

Just like how by the time the iPad 2 came out, rumors of the retina display were completely dispelled:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704364004576132643125168876.html
 
I would absolutely love to see a redesigned iPhone 5 with a larger screen, but you know what? If we don't get that, I'll be more than glad to welcome a 4S, or whatever it may be.
 
I think you are seriously overestimating how involved Apple gets with these things.

You're kidding, right -- Apple makes a living out of selectively releasing information to journalists to control the flow of news about their products.

Unless you REALLY think when someone at WSJ or otherwise says "a source close to Apple" or "spoke on the condition of anonymity" that it literally means someone who secretly leaked something to the press. In which case you'd be incredibly naive.
 
The WSJ has released their article for Tuesday morning before the iPhone 5 announcement.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204612504576609462919387474.html

Notably, they continue to mention a slimmer design with a larger screen. I find this to be good news.

Not exactly. They mention "general expectations" and "unofficial". It's not confirming or anything. They're just reporting what the rumors are.

Apple Ready to Talk iPhone at Event Tuesday
By JOHN LETZING

Apple Inc. is expected to unveil Tuesday the newest version of a device that has helped bolster the company's fortunes more than any other in recent years: the iPhone.

General expectations for what has widely and unofficially been dubbed the iPhone 5 are for a slimmer device with a larger touch screen, an improved camera and a relatively speedy chip of the same variety found in the current version of Apple's iPad tablet. There also has been some speculation about possible voice-command capability.

The price is expected to remain consistent with the $199 to $299 charged for an iPhone 4, depending on the amount of memory included.

An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment ahead of the event.

Former Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs unveiled the current version of the iPhone at the company's developers' conference in June 2010. It wasn't immediately clear whether Mr. Jobs, who stepped aside in August as a result of health issues, would attend the event, which is occurring at Apple's Silicon Valley headquarters.

Mr. Jobs, who went on medical leave in January for an undisclosed illness, has been replaced by current Chief Executive Tim Cook. Mr. Cook's performance Tuesday--should he stand in for his predecessor Jobs and lead the keynote address--will also come under intense scrutiny.

Though known generally to have a more reserved demeanor than Mr. Jobs, Mr. Cook may yet prove to be a showman of the same order, Sterne Agee & Leach Inc. analyst Shaw Wu advised clients in a recent research note. The analyst added: "We don't think Steve Jobs picked Tim without him having somewhat of a 'vision thing'."

In keeping with the Cupertino, Calif., technology giant's secretive ways, Apple distributed last week a vague invitation for the event, with the heading, "Let's talk iPhone."

Analysts have sought to decipher Apple's invitation, and divine what the company has in store with the iPhone 5. Wu wrote in his research note that the invite featured a number "1," perhaps signaling that only one new device will be unveiled.

The new iPhone is also expected to be available from Sprint Nextel Corp. Current versions of the device have only been available in the U.S. on the networks of AT&T Inc. and Verizon Wireless, which is owned by Verizon Communications Inc. and Vodafone Group PLC.

Peter Misek, an analyst with Jefferies & Co., has projected that the new iPhone also will have an Apple A5 processor, the same chip found in Apple's iPad 2 tablet, along with an improved camera, slightly larger screen and a somewhat slimmer body design. The current iPhone includes an Apple A4 chip.

In addition, Apple is seen possibly putting voice-command functions in the new phone, thanks to the company's purchase last year of Siri Inc., which had developed a voice-activated personal assistant.

Carriers should be offering the new device by the middle of this month, Misek suggested. The new phone isn't expected to be designed for faster fourth-generation wireless networks.

The first iPhone was unveiled in 2007. Since then, the device has set the tone for an entire industry, with its expansive touch screen and streamlined wafer shape becoming a de facto standard. Analysts are projecting that Apple will sell as many as 50 million iPhones this year.

For the quarter ended in June, Apple reported iPhone-related revenue of $20.3 billion, a large portion of the company's total revenue of $28.6 billion, and a sharp increase over the $8.4 billion in iPhone-related revenue in the same period a year earlier.

The company now faces tougher competition from smartphones using Google Inc.'s Android software that also feature full-screen touch displays and access to thousands of apps. The U.S. market share for Android phones is larger than that for the iPhone, 43% versus 28%, according to data tracker Nielsen. The iPhone, however, remains the most popular individual smartphone on the market, as Apple has sold over 128 million phones since 2007.
 
You're kidding, right -- Apple makes a living out of selectively releasing information to journalists to control the flow of news about their products.

I understand that this can happen, but the OP is talking as if Apple has complete control over what the WSJ prints.

Also notice the language that they use in this iPhone article as opposed to the iPad 2 article. This iPhone article has a lot of "is expected" and "possibly" while the iPad 2 article stated things as fact.
 
If tomorrow is just a garbage spec bump 4S release, I'd be very curious to know why Apple wasn't out controlling the lead a lot more strongly on this story.

A lot of people who are usually very well sourced to Apple (especially at WSJ) are still in the dark about what's going on. You'd think, given the way Apple has done controlled leaks in the past, they'd have the blogs and news media working to push expectations to software (this silly "Assistant" feature) instead of frothing at the mouth about hardware that is guaranteed to disappoint the general public.

----------

I understand that this can happen, but the OP is talking as if Apple has complete control over what the WSJ prints.

In a sense, they do.

If the WSJ is still running with this "bigger screen / slimmer form factor" line, an Apple contact can make 1 phone call to the WSJ and say "don't expect that" or "didn't hear it from me, but it's the 4S not the 5."

It doesn't benefit Apple to have wild speculation out there in advance of the event if they're planning on underdelivering badly. They'd be wiser to temper expectations on the hardware and focus more on the software.

Instead, they've let the tech world get all frothed up about a redesigned iPhone and it's going to undoubtedly leave a lot of customers and people in the media feeling flat.
 
I understand that this can happen, but the OP is talking as if Apple has complete control over what the WSJ prints.

I'm not at all saying they have complete control. But they do provide information. And information from Apple = the information you're going to print.

They have a PR department that is brilliant at manipulating popular opinion and the media. They would have put these iPhone 5 rumors to rest.

Hell, most publications are even now calling a 4S only event the "worst case scenario."
 
Because it's the Wall Street Journal. You know what they print has some weight. I'm not quoting another BGR post or anything here.

You should get long AAPL prior to the announcement if you think so highly of that WSJ article. :rolleyes:
 
You should get long AAPL prior to the announcement if you think so highly of that WSJ article. :rolleyes:

I posted the article, and said it sounded like good news to me. I'm not printing out the article and putting it in a diamond laced gold frame. I'm just saying, from the WSJ, it's reassuring to continue hearing these things.

Man, you guys get nasty late at night.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.