A tweet is essentially just a Facebook status update. Isn’t this just Facebook going back to basics? They’re unshackling themselves from all of the layers of BS they’ve added over the years.
It's barely been active for a day. This is not a runaway success.
Why is this important to so many people's daily lives? Information is important to live daily. But most if not, the majority are not worth reading. Tabloids years proper Supermarket newsstands etc. are now in this format. Do the same as I did when they were in vogue ignore it. I have more important problems I need to solve every day. if I need to care about useless views of what others think on social media. Is the day I give up on life.
Twitter appears to be unhappy with the runaway success of Threads, Meta's Twitter alternative that launched last night. Threads has amassed more than 30 million users in under 24 hours, making it the biggest threat to Twitter to date.
![]()
According to Semafor, Twitter lawyer Alex Spiro yesterday sent Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg a letter [PDF] accusing Meta of "systemic, willful, and lawful misappropriation of Twitter's trade secrets and other intellectual property."
Twitter claims that Meta hired "dozens" of former Twitter employees that "had and continue to have access to Twitter's trade secrets and other highly confidential information." The company further says that the employees "improperly retained Twitter documents and electronic devices," and that Meta took advantage of this to have those workers develop the "copycat" Threads app on an accelerated timeline.
When Elon Musk took over as CEO of Twitter, he fired thousands of employees who then had to look for work. It is likely that some of those employees transitioned to Meta, but hiring people actively looking for a job is not typically considered poaching.
Twitter's letter says that it plans to "enforce its intellectual property rights," with the company demanding that Meta "take immediate steps to stop using any Twitter trade secrets." Twitter threatens that it reserves the right to seek "civil remedies and injunctive relief" to prevent Meta from using its intellectual property.
Along with claims that Meta poached Twitter employees to develop Threads, Twitter says that Meta is "expressly prohibited" from scraping Twitter's followers or following data. Twitter is asking Meta to "preserve any documents" that could be relevant to a future dispute, suggesting that Twitter might be planning to file a lawsuit in the future.
Twitter has not gone after other Twitter-like social networks that include Bluesky and Mastodon, but Threads is a newly-launched app that is built off of Instagram, giving it a notable user base from its debut. Mastodon and Bluesky have far fewer users. In February, for example, Mastodon had 1.4 million active users, while Bluesky had 50,000 users at the end of April.
Following Twitter's accusations, Meta's communications director Andy Stone said that no one on the Threads engineering team is a former Twitter employee. "That's just not a thing," he wrote.
Article Link: Twitter Accuses Meta of Poaching Employees to Build ThreadWh
Lines of code can’t be patented, but software functions can be (albeit it’s very difficult to patent and even harder to defend). Many apps use identical lines of code.To make the same product? Former Twitter programmers/engineers could have gone on to make anything but they were hired to make a clone of Twitter. I still think that looks bad. If they reused code, it might even be illegal.
But the 🤡 is still running the 💩 show.Linda Yaccarino started her job as Twitter's new CEO a month ago today
![]()
Twitter's new CEO Linda Yaccarino logs first day in role
Twitter's new Chief Executive Officer Linda Yaccarino has begun her role at the social media company, she tweeted late on Monday, about a month after Elon Musk named her as the new CEO.www.reuters.com
Unbelievable. If this was proposed as the script for a drama or novel it would have been rejected on the grounds that it was implausible that a supposedly genius character would repeatedly self-sabotage and shoot himself in the foot to such a degree. 🤦♂️Let me see if I understand the sequence of events. Musk makes an outlandish offer to buy Twitter. Twitter calls the bluff and accepts. Musk gets cold feet and tries to wiggle out of the deal by claiming some made up issues with fake accounts (by the way, what has he done about bots and fake accounts now that he owns Twitter?). Musk is forced to buy Twitter or face the court system. Reluctantly buys the company and in a show of petty vindictiveness starts firing people all over the company. Things go down from there and continue going down. Claims some sort of freedom of expression crusade but it seems to be mostly allowing disinformation and hate go rampant. When you fire so many employees chances are some of them are going to end up creating a better version of your product. That is the computer industry ethos. Don't complain for a problem of your own creation. Way to tarnish your reputation after Tesla and SpaceX.
But the 🤡 is still running the 💩 show.
It does not seem like Linda is in charge at all.
The basic functionality of Twitter is the same as News Feed which Facebook rolled out in 2006.LMAO You don’t need to steal trade secrets to build a twitter clone. The whole concept is very simple to replicate in a technical level. Any junior programmer could single handedly write a twitter clone.
generally the agreements developers sign include a 2+ year time after employment has terminated where they cannot work on projects that compete with their own product.My gut reaction.. shouldn’t have fired 90% of your workforce…. They need new jobs… Meta was willing to hire…
Most non-compete clauses that are one sided are held as invalid. If someone agrees "not to compete" they are given compensation for that time frame.generally the agreements developers sign include a 2+ year time after employment has terminated where they cannot work on projects that compete with their own product.
While I dont know specifically about twitter , I would be surprised if there wasn't a no competing clause in there
Smartest one steal without getting caught.Good artists copy. Great artists steal.