Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
is it poaching when they don't really enjoy working at twitter anymore? he can't expect to gut the company, attempt to drastically change the culture and not experience a brain drain. why do people think Elon is some kind of genius?
 
  • Like
Reactions: redbeard331
It completely possible. Companies layoff people and hire people all the time. It depends on who they were laying off...when I worked at Verizon, they laid off more in store employees but was hiring more engineers. At the same time, they were also laying off some IT people...so yeah, you might have a case of foot in mouth disease.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: fc4090 and tripsync
”runaway success” It’s very obvious that people who lean to the left now hate Twiiter, simply because of politics. The phrasing they use to denounce anything that doesn’t jive with their political beliefs is telling. It’s always us vs them. Pitiful really!
It's very obvious that people who lean right sympathize with Musk and feel the need to defend him at every opportunity.

See? We can both play this game.
 
It makes me laugh how many people on here just can’t stand Elon Musk! You don’t get to be a billionaire by being stupid. Is Threads actually any good? What about Mastadon? Wasn’t that supposed to be the next big Twitter killer? People should go outside more instead of getting wound up over an app.
 
Yeah go ahead Elon and 🔥 more 💵 with lawsuits you can’t win. If there were stupidity contests you’d have a shelf full of 🏆

Not a fan of Zuck, but I’m looking forward to see Elons face getting a hit and distorting in slow motion with botox squirting of all pores. Will be the best giphy ever made…
 
Last edited:
It's very obvious that people who lean right sympathize with Musk and feel the need to defend him at every opportunity.

See? We can both play this game.
I defend the left’s right to express their beliefs within the law. I think the only thing Elon did was say the same for the right. Can you say the same?
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Chazz12
The article is written incorrectly. Twitter fired it's employees and thus any company is free to hire them, therefore the line in the article
When Elon Musk took over as CEO of Twitter, he fired thousands of employees who then had to look for work. It is likely that some of those employees transitioned to Meta, but hiring people actively looking for a job is not typically considered poaching.

Should have been worded as 'but hiring fired employees actively looking for a job is not poaching'.

Elon fired the majority of the workforce therefore any company is free to hire them. The wording in the article should have been very very clear about this.
 
I was a bit disappointed that I had to open an Instagram account to use Threads, though I understand why. I’m not sure if Threads is right for my use, though. I mainly use Twitter as a news feed, which Instagram isn’t. So migrating everyone over from there doesn’t necessarily work for me. Let’s see how it goes. Twitter could do with the competition and a kick up the arse.
 
Remember this article? Can you imagine if Elon was really running Apple.

View attachment 2229037


Reading that thread, it was amazing to see the number of idiots who thought that Musk running Apple as CEO would be great for the company. 🤦🏾‍♂️
 
You are wrong. He did not use a double negative. He has a statement with a single negative and a parenthetical with a single negative.
So the sentence “I do not love him (romantically, not platonically).” is correct?
 
Last edited:
I seriously doubt that the world's smartest software engineers were working at Twitter. Twitter has been a dumpster fire long before Elon.
Well, how inept can they be if they were in on "trade secrets" and Elon is complaining publicly about them working for Zuckerberg now that Threads is taking off?

Yes, I get that not every single individual Elon fired from Twitter was some top level super genius software engineer. Obvious, most were replaceable to some extent. That's how it usually is.

But there's some crazy mental gymnastics going on in your head if you insist that Elon never makes mistakes and only fired lazy, useless employees from Twitter. But then you, at the same time, support the employee poaching narrative that Elon is alleging here.

The story is either that Meta has legitimately been poaching Twitter to destroy the company by taking its top talent and trade secrets and using it to build Threads. That Elon didn't want to fire these top employees but they were bribed to work for Zuckerberg.

Or the story is that Elon did everything right throughout his Twitter takeover and he just fired a ton of useless people that are of use to nobody, neither for their skills or insider knowledge.

It can't be both at the same time. So which is it?

*Then there's also the third even more likely scenario that Elon is just being a sore loser and that his own decision to repeatedly implement more and more limitations/restrictions for both free and paid Twitter users is what's pushing droves of people to sign up for the new Twitter-clone that offers everything pre-Musk Twitter offered with none of the limitations and subscription fees of 2023 Twitter? Plus it's backed by one of the biggest players in tech and social, Meta?
 
Never thought I’d see a thread where Zuck is the good guy.
I wouldn't say "good guy". This is just about money.

But when one business repeatedly fails to deliver the product that it's success was built upon, the product that consumers want and other businesses want to partner with, then obviously any other party stepping in and delivering that product deserves the win.

Elon checkmated himself with his ever-changing stance on Twitter's direction and failure to understand its core strengths as a platform/business. Zuck just moved in to end the game.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.