Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple doesn't use the VESA HDR classification at all. They don't use it on the Pro Display XDR either.
To be fair, DisplayHDR was only in its second year when the Pro Display XDR launched in 2019 — really it wasn’t until 2024 that it became a meaningful test:

 
  • Like
Reactions: EugW
Would like to see 120Hz on the next version. Two sizes also 27" and 32". Hopefully Apple will keep the prices the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
They can’t call the current Studio Display “HDR” because technically it doesn’t support HDR
I mean technically they could add HDR functionality and then call it “HDR”. They had everything for this. But they chose not to do that.
Any of Apple devices with HDR support has either miniLED or OLED panel. I think it's not a coincidence.
 
You don’t say what monitor you have, so I can’t comment on that, but a big part of what is required for VESA DisplayHDR 600 certification is a contrast ratio of 2000:1 or better. It’s not just about brightness
yes, looks like although my monitor (Samsung ViewFinity S9 5K) has HDR support but doesn't have formal DisplayHDR600 certification because of 1000:1 contrast ratio. But anyways local dimming is crucial for good quality HDR. Plain IPS just can't compete.
 
I mean technically they could add HDR functionality and then call it “HDR”. They had everything for this. But they chose not to do that.
Any of Apple devices with HDR support has either miniLED or OLED panel. I think it's not a coincidence.
I was going to dispute this, but I see you are right, because Apple did it for the 2020 (macOS Catalina) iMac 5K, which supports HDR10 and also converts other HDR formats to HDR10. Earlier iMacs 5K cannot do that (even running Catalina), except for the iMac Pro. See here: Play HDR video on Mac

I won’t belabor why this is, as I don’t know for sure, but suffice it to say it probably isn’t the AH-IPS panels themselves (from LG Display) that are the limiting factor.

This is underlined in the Studio Display, where Apple appears to have expressly decided not to provide HDR10 support, deeming macOS EDR a better option for handling HDR content.

Your Samsung could be another example proving your point, as most likely (we don’t know for sure, it’s also possible it is an updated PLS panel/backlight from Samsung Display) it uses the same panel as the Studio Display. Regardless, it supports HDR10, but (as you experienced first-hand) its limitations in contrast ratio and color gamut make it unsatisfactory, not to mention luminance.

That said, I think you are wrong to dismiss the VESA DisplayHDR 600 performance spec as a meaningful gauge of the HDR capabilities of these newer IPS Black panels from LG Display and the parallel panels from AUO Display+, both of which have vastly improved, HDR-friendly contrast ratios and color gamuts. They don’t have the high luminance of gaming panels, but they do have the high resolution of content-creation panels.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: thenewepic
Sorry, you're right. 1) I should have been clear that I was not counting Apple's, but I actually didn't know Dell had one. I tend to ignore Dell because their display are always cheap wobbly creaking plastic, just like most of their computers. 2) Those other 6K displays were released within the last few months so they did sneak by me.
If you are more interested in 6K then join the Kuycon G32P Thread!
 
That would push the price up even further. 5K is the perfect resolution for 27". I just fear that they call it the Studio Display XDR and charge $1999-2499 for it while keeping the older model for $999-1199 in the lineup.
It could be the perfect resolution for office or people under 45…
 
I believe that Mini LED with VRR would be a fantastic update. I would probably finally buy one or two.

PS: I don't miss OLED on my MacBook Pro's since Mini LED was adopted.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.