If I had to choose what lens I wanted for a second camera on a phone I would want the telephoto. I personally have no use for the ultra wide lens which is why it won't be missed by me.
I'm sticking with the Air. I am a pro user. I miss the cameras. But the difference in day to day use when not using the camera (99% of use) is dramatic. Battery is same as 16 pro. Speaker sounds fine. It's the first real new iphone since the X.
Yes, they are. The 17 pro/max, the thickest iPhones ever, are .34”, or .12” thicker than the Air. That’s still very thin.Have you held an Air? I don't have one but it felt great in the hand. And every iPhone is not pretty darn thin.
This describes the iPhone 16e.One camera, esim, no mmwave, keep the original thickness. pack all that new space with a battery.
Would rather get the 17 Pro than that. For me either the 17 Pro, which always get the Pro Series or the Air. Never consider the regular one.Yes, but you get a better battery in the similarly lightweight regular 17, with an additional camera and speaker, all for £200 less
The width issue combined with the camera compromises were the primary reasons I decided to return my iPhone Air and go back to my iPhone 16p. I have no interest in the 17 pro models because they are butt ugly IMO.Actually had to return it after a week of use. It turns the width of the phone caused me more problem to hold the device as compare to the weight. Tried 17 pro and found it to be more comfortable. I think iPhone 17 would also be fine. Other issues such as battery and camera were not major deal breaker for me.
I'm amazed how polarizing the design of the 17 Pro is this year. I think it's the best/most appropriate looking Pro phone to date. I like the balanced placement and shape of the plateau. And even more so that it serves a function, similar to the Air. The left sided camera bumps always seemed a bit off to me on other iPhones. But I respect the opinion of those that don't like it.The width issue combined with the camera compromises were the primary reasons I decided to return my iPhone Air and go back to my iPhone 16p. I have no interest in the 17 pro models because they are butt ugly IMO.
If you get 2 days of batterylife, you better buy a 200$ phone because you don't use it
The iPhone Air has the smallest battery of the 2025 iPhone lineup, but some people may be able to get through the day without needing to recharge.
The battery lasts longer than the iPhone 16 battery
Apple specs are presumably with heavily optimised video playback.Putting these two statements together, does this mean hardly anyone got through the day with an iPhone 16? Sounds like BS to me.
The new Air gets much better battery life than that 13 Mini."but some people may be able to get through the day without needing to recharge"
It's simply insane that people find it acceptable that a phone can't make it through an entire day without charging. I so miss the days when a phone could go several days if needed. Yeah, they didn't do as much, but seriously. Give us a phone that can make it a week. Make the screen small enough so it can fit in the pocket. No, it doesn't have to be as thin as a piece of paper.
The iPhone mini 13 is so much the ideal size phone, why doesn't Apple offer that? Smaller is far more important than thinner!!!!!
For you. Ideal for you. My Air fits in my pockets fine and I’d rather not give up any more battery life for it to have a 1 inch smaller screen"but some people may be able to get through the day without needing to recharge"
It's simply insane that people find it acceptable that a phone can't make it through an entire day without charging. I so miss the days when a phone could go several days if needed. Yeah, they didn't do as much, but seriously. Give us a phone that can make it a week. Make the screen small enough so it can fit in the pocket. No, it doesn't have to be as thin as a piece of paper.
The iPhone mini 13 is so much the ideal size phone, why doesn't Apple offer that? Smaller is far more important than thinner!!!!!