Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Ok I read this:

"with nothing but sunglasses to disguise their faces"

and the word 'hot'

and imagined them naked. Anyone else do this?

Why would you just hand over money if they werent naked?

:D

I'm still wondering why the teller didn't ask to be taken hostage (As said above). I wish I had been in that bank, its only twenty minutes from my house.
 
I really don't think these girls are 14.

They could pass for anything between 16-20. I deal with lots of 18 year olds and handle labs for a 1st year university class, along with a high-school equivalent class at my university. I'd actually guess they were 18 from the photo above. Lots of 18 year old girls look like they do. They're not THAT hot. I'd need to see the rest of their work. :eek:

My daughter is 13. I definitely know what 14 year-olds look like, and these girls could easily be 14. Even 13 isn't out of the question. They could also be as old as 20, but I seriously doubt they're older than that.
 
My daughter is 13. I definitely know what 14 year-olds look like, and these girls could easily be 14. Even 13 isn't out of the question. They could also be as old as 20, but I seriously doubt they're older than that.

Shhh! They're not as hot to me if they are that young... Can't we just say they are 18?
 
Almost looks like the Olsen twins. :eek:

But they're already loaded, so unless they were both on a bender and their atm card was lost, it wasn't them. :D
 
Nice disguise.

Do they seriously think they wont be caught?

LoL!

kids these days, watch more TV and you wouldnt be making such an obvious blunder.

jeez, at least watch Point Break and do it right!

pointbreak12.gif
 
They do look pretty hot, but whats the sentence for a bank robbery? Isn't it like 15-20 years? It would be real sad if they get caught and convicted..
 
Unless these two girls were shoving a gun in my face I dont think I could take either of them seriously. I mean come on. Cute 'lil kiddies wanting money from the bank. How precious. Now get back to class!
 
How much of a 'wuss' is the teller?

Seriously.

"We've got a piece of paper and we're not afraid to use it."

To which I would reply: "Well f**k off then!"







:rolleyes:
 
How much of a 'wuss' is the teller?

Seriously.

"We've got a piece of paper and we're not afraid to use it."

To which I would reply: "Well f**k off then!"

:rolleyes:


Trust me, us Georgian's are nothing but p****y's. Ok, maybe not. If it was a guy he could have been distracted by other features.
 
The money's insured anyway, so other than the fact that it has to be replaced, and I'd never feel safe in the bank, what does it matter that it happened at a BoA. A few months back, some guys took the bank manager (Sun Trust) hostage at his own home, and kept him until he opened the branch the next day. That bank was less than 2 miles from where I live.

Anyway, this kinda reminds me of a scene in the movie 'Bandits' where Bruce Willis robs a bank with a highlighter. :) Except that was a movie and this really happened.
 
How is the BOA's fault? They had a horrible teller, which could happen at any bank.

I just hate BOA, my bank.

Ive had them as follows:

Barnett Bank
Nations Bank
Bank of America

all one company that just kept getting bigger, and at each step got more and more fees handed out like candy during Halloween.

BOA is one of the WORST perpetrators of the "bigger is better" mentality of banking. That because they have nationwide branches, they can be jerks about how they treat their customers and their money.

They take your money, pool it and earn interest. You, if you are lucky, may get 0.01% of the money back that they have earned on YOUR money. But they will charge you a fee when your checking account drops below $500, just for "monthly maintenance"

BOA, they suck.

Of course, this could have happened to any bank, any teller, anywhere. But it happened to BOA and I now have a chance to rant, YEAH ME!
 
That teller followed the standard robbery procedure for virtually all US banks and stores. Give them what they want and get them out there as quickly as possible, the idea is to keep the crimes nonviolent if possible.
 
I haven't had great service with BoA either, to be honest. The first time (which should have been the last time I ever dealt with them).They held my check without notifying me, and as a result, several checks went through when there was insufficient funds. Of course, I found out about this while my wife and I were on our Honeymoon when the debit card got declined. :mad: We had to cut our trip short(er). Shoulda been the last time we ever dealt with them.
 
<angry anti BOA rant>
I agree, you get gipped when it comes down to interest rates. Thats why I moved my savings account to ING. However, I think they are the best as far as online banking goes, the ease of use in their system really appeals to me. I have dealt with Suntrust's online banking and it completely blew, I still haven't tried Wachovia, but I am not 100% on if they even have it.
Oh, and you don't get charged a fee if you use direct deposit (like me.)
 
That teller followed the standard robbery procedure for virtually all US banks and stores. Give them what they want and get them out there as quickly as possible, the idea is to keep the crimes nonviolent if possible.


I suppose you're right.

Those paper cut's don't half sting!

;)
 
I agree, you get gipped when it comes down to interest rates. Thats why I moved my savings account to ING. However, I think they are the best as far as online banking goes, the ease of use in their system really appeals to me.

I agree. I moved my savings to HSBC, but I still use BoA checking, and I agree that their online services are really supurb. I haven't had any problems in person at any of their branches, either.

(getting a little off topic, aren't we?)
 
I agree. I moved my savings to HSBC, but I still use BoA checking, and I agree that their online services are really supurb. I haven't had any problems in person at any of their branches, either.

(getting a little off topic, aren't we?)

Oh, we're horribly off topic now. Might as well change the thread title, lol.
 
I agree. I moved my savings to HSBC, but I still use BoA checking, and I agree that their online services are really supurb. I haven't had any problems in person at any of their branches, either.

(getting a little off topic, aren't we?)

there is only so much that can be said of a grainy B/W photo of two MTV Malibu girls. they will be caught, case closed.





BoA has people behind the scenes doing nefarious things, i just know it. Otherwise the next thing wouldnt have happened to me, friends, and peers:

Deposit some checks, write some checks.

Deposited check after 2pm, should be in your bank account by the next morning.

Write some checks and send them out.

A written check is placed against your account, only you dont have sufficient funds.

How is this possible, you deposited the money yesterday, when there was no check being drawn on your account, and yet today there is insufficient funds.

Using BoA awesome online tools, no arguments there, you can see that BoA decided to take your deposit (which would cover the check) and put it in AFTER they have drawn the check on your accnt.

Why?

To charge you $30+ for overdraft, and then another few dollars for going under $0.00.
 
<BOA overdraft scheme>QUOTE]

Yeah I had something similar happen. I had some bill schedualed to go out, and some checks schedualed to come in. They ALWAYS take before they give, I think I lost 90 bucks in that deal but, now I know.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.