Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"China also did ask Apple to relocate the datacenters for all their PRC users to China. And by law China has access to all the local datacenters it wants. That's much worse than the USA asking Apple to unlock a phone only to get rejected by Apple."
Who are you quoting?

In any case:

1) Apple can’t/won’t unlock iPhones in China or anywhere else. Apple did not build a back door into iPhone for China or any other country.

2) China passed a law that all iCloud data for Chinese citizens residing in China mainland must be stored on servers operated by Chinese internet services company Guizhou. This means the release of iCloud data will be subject to China law, not US law.

3) Apple has two options: comply with the law, or shut down iCloud. Other cloud providers like Amazon, Microsoft and Google also complied with the law.

4) 999 of 1,000 of those affected chose to accept the new terms and conditions for iCloud, have their data migrated to servers operated by Guizhou and be subject to the laws of China instead of US law. They would rather have their data more easily accessed than do without iCloud.

5) Apple may have to leave China at some point in the future, for example if China were to pass a law requiring a back door into iPhone. Apple will not do that.

However, Apple will also not require that other countries be subject to US law in order for them to access iCloud data. Australia, Canada, the UK or any other country on earth could pass similar laws as China if they so choose. Apple would obey those laws as well.

I’m glad people are starting to understand more about privacy and what governments around the world are doing to interfere with it.

In China, it wouldn’t surprise me if 5 or 10 years from now, the government requires all citizens to have video cameras and microphones in every room in their house. Their citizens may accept that, or they might rise up and overthrow their repressive government. Who knows? It’s up to them.
 
Last edited:

Must read
Law enforcement is under no legal obligation to tell the truth. In fact that is key to most investigations. The reverse is not true however. It’s actually a crime to lie to law enforcement.
Remember it is not unpatriotic to assert your constitutional rights. Even Supreme Court has stated, “do not talk to law enforcement”
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: alecgold
Didn't Apple just say at CES that they do scan through their icloud services for pedophilia thus invading peoples privacy?
Interesting. Have something more than spin on this?
Apple doesn't care about privacy. At any moment in time Apple will do or say whatever increases the value of Tim's bonus. That's all.
As apple grows so does Tim’s bonus. So go Tim.😏
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.