And? Are you going to dig a little deeper? You're inches away from the grand prize.
What you've posted means that a) none of Apple's competitors can produce a phone that on its own, singly, can equal the sheer quality of build, design, and User Experience of the iPhone, and b) Apple's competitors are unable to do so (since most of them in philosophy and practice are the polar opposite of Apple), and they have no choice but to compete via a horizontal business model which = volume-pushing at all price points an ocean of devices that run different versions of a universally-licensed operating system.)
Eric T. Mole took great crib notes. But Google + HTC + Samsung + Motorola + ZTE + Huawei + upward of a dozen manufacturers and lord knows how many junk phone makers that barely anyone's heard of, are not Apple. Not even close.
Plus, all Google cares about is an electronic device as a vehicle for ads. Since they saw the smart phone market was going to explode and Schmidt already did his "investigations" of the iPhone, the smart thing to do was to get on board the smartphone train, with a horizontal business model as their only option for any success (as if an ad-peddler gives a damn about hardware anyway.)
And it shows. No matter how much volume Google and OEMs can push, an unweeded garden will remain an unweeded garden. By default.
That, is what's going on.