Free speech for me, but not for TheeWhy does the party that is doing everything possible to dismantle free elections have any interest in free speech? Makes you wonder what free speech means to them.
Free speech for me, but not for TheeWhy does the party that is doing everything possible to dismantle free elections have any interest in free speech? Makes you wonder what free speech means to them.
1. Absolutely, and it is tiring hearing government complain about private company actions. However, if there were collusion to suppress ”valid” speech (as opposed to calls to violence, threats, harassment, etc) then the collusion would very much blur that line. Jordan is playing semantics games to make valid functions seem conspiratorial.1. The first amendment is about GOVERNMENT limiting free speech. It does not apply to private companies. If it does, how about a subpoena for *Truth* Social?
2. To the uninformed here, there is a difference between free speech and hate speech. If a person or persons call for the extermination of a group of people that is hate speech. Case in point, pre-WWII Germany.
Guessing you haven't read the actual files or went in having already made up your mind. Did you watch the hearing? Picture of Musk at Super Bowl sitting with Murdock shows his "fair and balanced" pursuit of facts 😂Elon has directly supplied all of the documentary evidence of what happened before he bought Twitter in the Twitter Files. It’s obviously clear to any objective observer that the evidence of government agency collision and implied coercion is the foundation of the resulting censorship.
Yes, but that is a subset of “hate speech”. That subset is not protected, but as long as it does not cross over into those unprotected domains, people are free to say whatever ignorant, hateful garbage they believe.There are many exceptions to free speech, one of which is anything that incites violence or making harmful threats against someone or group of people that are reasonably enactable. Both of these are usually a major part of what “hate speech” is.
Hate speech: Inciting violence, hostility or aggression against a person or group.What is that difference?
If only there were a concept, like criminal intent that is absolutely inherent and clear in that “bad editing”.Actually yes, it does and your absolute is wrong. That’s a very bad example that comes from a bad editing of Oliver Wendell Holmes opinion.
You can yell fire if you think there’s a fire. You can yell fire if you’re an actor on stage. You can yell fire in many other occasions.
![]()
Yes, you can yell 'fire' in a crowded theater
SCOTUS Justice Alito recently repeated the common misconception that "shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater" is unprotected speech.reason.com
They blocked Alex Jones’ podcast for relentlessly harassing the families of slain children at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Unfortunately the conservative platform is that it’s not only okay with this, but even encourages personal attacks on the families of slain children because they are soulless demons who protect the rights of murders to carry military grade assault weapons over the lives of our innocent children. Hearing those children dying in Uvalde while the police were just hanging out on their phones was the last straw for me.Politics aside, Apple doesn’t have a social media site or a search engine. What speech are they suppressing? Same with Amazon I guess.
Ehhh, there is still a line. Not a lawyer, but I feel that context and jurisdiction may conclude that falls under the “fighting words” category.The difference:
Free Speech - Government can't stop you from saying anything, Any other place can, places of employment, individuals, etc.
Hate speech - Is just hateful speech. They're not really related.
Someone can say your Mom is fat, and the government can do nothing about it, but they could get punched in the face.
You are free to make those claims if you want, but once you start harassing and threatening others for not sharing in your ignorance then you have left the sphere of protected speech.A “quick search on the Internet” will bring up all manner of “research papers” showing that cold fusion is the secret zero-point energy source that Elvis uses in his Jewish Space Laser Flying Saucer to commute between his two-headed stepson’s place in Elon Musk’s Martian Playboy mansion and his home with Sasquatch in Kalamazoo.
Me? I like to get my medical facts from actual … what’s the word? Ah, yes … “doctors.” Like those at the Mayo Clinic:
![]()
Debunking COVID-19 myths
Some information you come across about COVID-19 may be out of date or false. Learn about COVID-19 myths so you can bust them when you see them.www.mayoclinic.org
Unless you want to claim that the Mayo Clinic is part of some grand super-conspiracy to keep the truth about Elvis from the sheeple?
(And, if you do want to seriously make such claims, please, in all sincerity, seek the services of a competent mental health practitioner. You don’t need to suffer the way you currently are.)
b&
Reason you can't find any info is because our media doesn't cover stories that go against the Democratic Party. In addition, most people who think they understand election issues in this country are actually not well-read - if they were, they would know the reports on these matters.Got any more info you can share? I can’t find anything.
It's probably relating to the whole Apple Podcasts and Alex Jones but keeping in mind that at that point the Apple Podcast platform was merely an aggregator rather than a platform where podcasts were being hosted. With that all being said, the issue shouldn't be about freedom of speech (bringing up freedom of speech and 'the right' to be on private platforms by many here demonstrates an ignorance of the first amendment - side note, anyone find it funny how when it came to the same sex wedding cake fiasco that the same people on the right were proclaiming that private businesses should be allowed to choose who they want to do business with? am I expecting too much to expect consistency?) but the concentration of capital but neither party are willing to talk about it because both are beholden to the same masters. We need to move to a decentralised model, one that isn't dependent upon advertisement revenue etc. rather than both sides of the politics expecting that there will be a billionaire riding a white horse to 'rescue' them from the clutches of the evil tyrants on the other side of politics.Politics aside, Apple doesn’t have a social media site or a search engine. What speech are they suppressing? Same with Amazon I guess.
I have no problem with this. You might talk to the admins first.Please, can we yell "Fire!" in a crowded forum?
I have no problem with this. You might talk to the admins first.
FIRE!!!!!!
The difference between a bar that kicks you out, because you spout off stuff that the owner and patrons don’t like, and Apple, Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc. is that they have become de facto telecommunications media.Apple's attorneys should just response to Jordan with the XKCD Webcomic on Free Speech.
(Edit: Sarcasm, for the record. I didn't mean this as legitimate legal advice.)
And that’s exactly the question at the core. Hate speech is protected. A threat is not. So I can say “I hate all Macrumors users I hope they all die.” as it’s protected speech.If only there were a concept, like criminal intent that is absolutely inherent and clear in that “bad editing”.
I am not wiggling around. Your statement was factually incorrect.Nice way to wiggle around. You don’t have the right to yell fire in a crowded theater, as an audience member when there is none as a way to cause panic in the theater. While flying on a passenger Airplane, you don’t have the right to call out to everyone “I have a bomb and it’s about to go off”, again only to cause panic.
I fear it will never go away, hence people will keep misunderstanding how the 1A works.Oh my gosh. Can we please stop with the fire in a crowded theater myth. Look it up. Get a new example.
Politics aside, Apple doesn’t have a social media site or a search engine. What speech are they suppressing? Same with Amazon I guess.
What must be the average IQ of the voters who sent this moron to Congress?
Present some instances where the government forced companies to silence free speech?
Apple de-platformed many app developers between 200 and 2022 from participating In the Apple App Store because Apple disagreed with the political opinions of the people that were using the app developer’s apps and the app developer was not moderating content to Apple’s satisfaction.
A “quick search on the Internet” will bring up all manner of “research papers” showing that cold fusion is the secret zero-point energy source that Elvis uses in his Jewish Space Laser Flying Saucer to commute between his two-headed stepson’s place in Elon Musk’s Martian Playboy mansion and his home with Sasquatch in Kalamazoo.
Me? I like to get my medical facts from actual … what’s the word? Ah, yes … “doctors.” Like those at the Mayo Clinic:
![]()
Debunking COVID-19 myths
Some information you come across about COVID-19 may be out of date or false. Learn about COVID-19 myths so you can bust them when you see them.www.mayoclinic.org
Unless you want to claim that the Mayo Clinic is part of some grand super-conspiracy to keep the truth about Elvis from the sheeple?
(And, if you do want to seriously make such claims, please, in all sincerity, seek the services of a competent mental health practitioner. You don’t need to suffer the way you currently are.)
b&
I hope they all die can be read as a threat.And that’s exactly the question at the core. Hate speech is protected. A threat is not. So I can say “I hate all Macrumors users I hope they all die.” as it’s protected speech.
Could you really be any more naive? That’s like saying the mob didn’t do anything wrong when they’d say to people, “it’d be a real shame if…” (threat)Provide a single instance where anyone in the government demanded/ordered/required/commanded Twitter to take any action on any content. Asking, requesting, inquiring, informing, etc. excluded.
It's because they won control of the House and they think that gives them the mandate to waste time and taxpayer money on a bunch of dumb investigations.
The private companies are free to tell the government to go pound sand because they have a right to free speech as well. But, freedom of speech is NOT absolute. You can’t, for example, yell “Fire!” In a crowded theater, creating panic. You are also not allowed to disseminate classified material which could put Americans at risk. When people like marjorie Taylor, Greene, or Donald Trump incite an insurrection or transmit dangerous lies about a pandemic, the companies are well within their rights to ban them from their platform. As they should. Those offenders can go yell it out on a street corner.
I guess the FBI paying Twitter $3.5 million USD to silence Hunter’s laptop and Sleepy Joe’s 10% in the family crime syndicate profits technically isn’t “forcing “.