I defy anyone to coherently define what a “repairable” design is. Thinking that politicians and bureaucrats are capable of defining the concept is a fools errand. Pursuing this pipe dream is clear evidence that politicians should have no part in supply side product development. Whoever is running policy in the West Wing has clearly never been involved with electronics product development. It’s a domain far better left for demand to decide and precisely what politicians and lawyers should never engage in.
I will postulate that "repairable" design was products made in the 1950's where anything and everything was "analog" and vacuum tubes and there was no technology in anything.