Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I defy anyone to coherently define what a “repairable” design is. Thinking that politicians and bureaucrats are capable of defining the concept is a fools errand. Pursuing this pipe dream is clear evidence that politicians should have no part in supply side product development. Whoever is running policy in the West Wing has clearly never been involved with electronics product development. It’s a domain far better left for demand to decide and precisely what politicians and lawyers should never engage in.


I will postulate that "repairable" design was products made in the 1950's where anything and everything was "analog" and vacuum tubes and there was no technology in anything.
 
People that pay big bucks for iPhones (like me) should have some choice in getting it repaired, but as an Apple Stock holder, I will trust any repairs to Apple, even if they are more expensive. I got stung once getting a new exhaust for my Audi 90, took it to a local mechanic who put on an aftermarket system that was awful, didn't fit right, didn't have the proper design which made run poorly. I bought a factory approved system for close to $700 and had him take off the crappy one and put mine on. Called the supplier of the crappy one and they said he could return it. It pays to know what you are getting. People need to do the necessary searches on the reputation person or company doing the repair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mbarto and subi257
No, I think the point is that the company should be responsible for repairs for a longer time— selling these little insurance schemes is just another profit center for companies that discourages setting a baseline of quality.

In theory, that is. In practice I’ve never purchased Applecare and have never needed it.

Disagreed. You do know they bake warranty costs into the price of the product, right? So a $399 iPhone SE will suddenly be $429 if Apple was forced to cover 2 years of repairs. You're simply forcing everyone, including yourself, to pay more for warranty that you possibly don't want.
 
A bit mixed on this one - personally I'll take the cost hit and use Apple where possible, but I believe there are other people who may prefer to use a third-party, lower-priced option. Where I'm annoyed though is that there are so many issues that need addressing at the federal level, I don't understand why the President is giving attention to this issue.

Because this isn't just about iPhone.

It's about farm equipment, EVs, medical devices, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: duervo
Anyone who has worked in a computer repair shop know how it's supposed to be, but that's not how it actually works. Apple can't tell if the guy who did the repair is Apple-certified or not unless it's a single worker shop. Way back when, when I was the only tech to pass all 3 Apple-certification tests (laptop hardware, desktop hardware, software) we had 3 techs who did Apple repairs. Some of these indy shops will having 1 Apple-certified tech qualifies, but that doesn't mean every tech in the shop knows what he's doing.
This is currently happening at my repair shop. Only two people fully certified including me. The rest of the crew has repaired Apple devices under supervision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: subi257
Because this isn't just about iPhone.

It's about farm equipment, EVs, medical devices, etc.
And that is EXACTLY where non certified manufacturer trained people need to stay out of. Farm machinery is some of the most deadly equipment. 1 mistake can kill somebody.....followed by lawsuits. It is also the same on cars that have a system that stops the car from hitting the car in front....ie Subaru Eyesite....if the windshield needs to be replaced, the entire laser system needs to be recalibrated. done incorrectly, once again, you will kill somebody.
 
Last edited:
Hope it doesn’t pass. I’ve seen so many people…parents, friends, exes, etc, who generally arent tech savvy, get scammed by shady 3rd party repair kiosks and insurance companies who “fix” their devuces with low quality chinese/fake components that dont meet OEM spec and ruin the integrity of the device.
 
So when the manufacturer doesn't certify anyone else but themselves, you end up with John Deere.
So, yes John Deere should offer other options with trained techs that are available to the farmer faster as harvesting has a expiration date. but, those kind of machines are not something to f* around with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacSERV
Hope it doesn’t pass. I’ve seen so many people…parents, friends, exes, etc, who generally arent tech savvy, get scammed by shady 3rd party repair kiosks and insurance companies who “fix” their devuces with low quality chinese/fake components that dont meet OEM spec and ruin the integrity of the device.
Agreed. I’ve even had AT&T‘s phone warranty provide replacements for one of my kid’s iPhones and twice they’ve gotten replacements that were clearly not Apple certified refurbs - they were broken or damaged right out of the box. I feel bad for the few actual good repair facilities that can’t get enough Apple certified parts to do repairs, but Apple themselves run into these issues too, which in part is why you sometimes get device replacements when something can’t be fixed, or not fixed in a quick enough timeframe.
 
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: duervo and subi257
I don’t see why this would force design changes. Rather, the crux of this is that if something breaks in your device, you should be able to replace it (or the assembly that contains it) using genuine parts, tools, and guides from the manufacturer. So if your NAND storage died, you’d likely be able to replace the logic board and not the NAND chips themselves if you so chose, and Apple would still be able to offer its repair services — at competitive prices.
As I said, if this is true then I'm less bothered. If this leads to "batteries and RAM must be replaceable by the user" or "adhesives can't be used to seal the housing" requirements then we have lawyers making technical decisions which never turns out well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: One2Grift
That's the point, If you are not willing to go through the process to become certified and you should not be allowed to do it and depending on what field it is, your "non certified" lack of knowledge could get someone killed. Not just talking phones here.
It’s a minimum of $50,000 to become “certified.” Why you may ask? Apple requires a store front. That means you need a minimum of $50,000 just to keep your doors open for six months. Apple’s requirement of a storefront is a massive barrier to entry.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: subi257
Hope it doesn’t pass. I’ve seen so many people…parents, friends, exes, etc, who generally arent tech savvy, get scammed by shady 3rd party repair kiosks and insurance companies who “fix” their devuces with low quality chinese/fake components that dont meet OEM spec and ruin the integrity of the device.
Well how are those shops going to fix devices with high quality genuine replacement parts if Apple doesn’t make them available? 🤔
 
Disagreed. You do know they bake warranty costs into the price of the product, right? So a $399 iPhone SE will suddenly be $429 if Apple was forced to cover 2 years of repairs. You're simply forcing everyone, including yourself, to pay more for warranty that you possibly don't want.

Pick your poison. If Apple loses money from “right to repair,” they’ll just raise prices. I’d rather pay an extra $30 and get an extra year of warranty than pay an extra $30 for the right to have any random person fix my gadget.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fhopper
Yep. Apple could even make a profit on selling these genuine parts to those willing to install them, for those staying up at night worried about Apple’s ability to profit on aftermarket repairs.

So would a 30% profit margin be OK?
 
I had my iPhone battery replaced by genuine Apple service TWICE. Both failed within months.

Did it myself with the iFixit kit and it’s been fine ever since.
 
Agreed. I’ve even had AT&T‘s phone warranty provide replacements for one of my kid’s iPhones and twice they’ve gotten replacements that were clearly not Apple certified refurbs - they were broken or damaged right out of the box. I feel bad for the few actual good repair facilities that can’t get enough Apple certified parts to do repairs, but Apple themselves run into these issues too, which in part is why you sometimes get device replacements when something can’t be fixed, or not fixed in a quick enough timeframe.

Oh yeah my mom got scammed big time by Sprint like that. Her “new replacement” iphone 5s was some frankenstein refurbished ******** that had a fake screen and the battery didnt even last 2-3 hours.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: freedomlinux
This is good because many things Apple says that it’s irreparable, asking people to pay for a replacement, 500 euros, are indeed reparable.

This happen to me in the start of the year.

1. Noticed that the lightning port of my iPhone X (1300 euros back than) stopped charging. But considering that my battery was at 86% and barely use it decided to wait.

2. A few months after battery at 80% decided to replace.

3. Went to a an Apple certified shop to swap the battery.

4. They told me that couldn’t because the port wasn’t working.

5. I told them that knew so asked them to fix it and replace the battery.

6. They told me as per Apple policy could not repair the port.

7. They told me that they could not replace the battery also as they needed the port working to test device etc etc.

8. They gave me the Apple solution. For 550 euros or so they would give me a “new” iPhone X in exchange …

9. What? Anyway went to a Indian shop to find out how hard it was really to repair this thing.

10. Can you repair just the lightning port of this iPhone X? Yes sure … 50 euros all.

11. 45 minutes later done.

12. Back to the Apple certified shop to swap the battery for an original one. 1.5 hours later done … 60 euros.

110 euros total … Apple solution was 550 euros + plus hand over my perfectly good iPhone X that just needed a simple repair $$$$$

Geezzz. Customers and environment best interests …. Heheheh.

This all privacy, security, safety and all babble is just $ little else. Buy Apple as I do, but watch you $backs$, and use your customer voice for the good and for the suspicious or bad.

Trust no nothing, 0 good will.

PS: I would like the Govs to stay out of this too … but don’t see how they can with companies with this kind of extortion policies when it comes to repair the product they have sold.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: wallaby
Hope it doesn’t pass. I’ve seen so many people…parents, friends, exes, etc, who generally arent tech savvy, get scammed by shady 3rd party repair kiosks and insurance companies who “fix” their devuces with low quality chinese/fake components that dont meet OEM spec and ruin the integrity of the device.
As opposed to getting scammed by “Geniuses” who insist on replacing whole components or devices because they have limited to no actual repair skills. If the current situation wasn’t also bad, we wouldn’t need these laws.
 
Better/longer warranty protection would be far better than “right to repair.”
I'm sure you know this, but you can get that now. It is just a question of presently you have the choice to buy it or not. If it is mandated, then the cost will just be bundled into the price of the phone including for people that don't want it.

The people buying the item always pay, it isn't free. It is merely a question of whether one has to freedom to self insure or not.

Maybe if Apple offer 5 years of Apple care, but that would cost much more. Easy battery replacement for Macs, phones etc would be welcome, but it would come with costs.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.