headhighguy said:The iPod is a music player, for god's sake and it should stay that way. Adding photos to it is not making it a better music player.
Does adding photo capabilities make it a worse music player?
headhighguy said:Also dissappointed is the Photo synching approach. Why can't I sync photos with iPhoto and Music with iTunes. Now, you're telling me to import/export my photos from iPhoto into iTunes and then sync to the iPod? Doesn't make sense to me. It also doesn't make sense to most Apple users, especially iLife target audience.
This way you interact with your iPod through one interface instead of two, making it simpler.
headhighguy said:Nobody is gonna pull up with an Ipod to grandma's birthday fiddles around 10 minutes to hook it up to the (possibly outdated) TV set, accidentally changes a bunch of channel presets, and pull out a presentation on-screen... I don't know... seems far fetched. It doesn't sound like the average ipod customer to me.
I do slideshows on my powerbook all the time, being able to to do it with an iPod is going to be that much more conveniant. Yet again I dont' think I'm what you're thinking as an 'average iPod customer', as it sure as heck wouldn't take me ten minutes to plug a cable into the back of a telly.
headhighguy said:I'm disappointed. Apple doesn't show consistency in their product strategy. This seems to be indication for indecisiveness as to entering new media. They piggyback on existing products instead of rounding it up and do it "right" from scratch.
So you're saying they should have a seperate iPhoto device? Or just that the iPod is a hastily put together concept?