uh.. what happened to Apple? [underwhelmed by MBP]

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by Pandamic, Jan 31, 2014.

  1. Pandamic macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2014
    #1
    So my Windows laptop died after two years and I decided to go back to Apple since my last MBP lasted several years.

    WHAT HAPPENED?!

    A $2000 15" MBP will get me INTEGRATED GPU and only 256GB storage? Seriously?! Why? My last MBP was a 2007. From what I remember from MBP, they all contained adequate storage and all had discrete GPU, with the GPU memory being the difference with higher priced models. Now I have to shell out nearly $3000 just to get an underwhelming 750m, underwhelming 512gb storage, underwhelming i7 2.3ghz.
     
  2. MacDawg macrumors P6

    MacDawg

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Location:
    "Between the Hedges"
    #2
    I'm pretty dog gone happy with my underwhelming rMBP :)
    2013 2.6 GHz Intel Core i7 16GB/1TB
     
  3. yjchua95 macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2011
    Location:
    GVA, KUL, MEL (current), ZQN
    #3
    The Iris Pro performs like a GT640M.

    The GT750M is underwhelming? How is that so when it actually outperforms the GTX660M?

    512GB storage is underwhelming? Perhaps you have no idea that it's a PCIe SSD with write speeds of 650MB/s and read speeds of 750MB/s, so the price is justified. Or are you still stuck in 2007 thinking that it's a cheap piece-of-crap spinning HDD?

    2.3GHz quad core i7 is underwhelming? It's way faster than a 3GHz dual core i7.

    And if you match the processor, RAM and SSD on both Iris-only models and GT750M models, their prices are exactly the same. So the GT750M is a free add-on.
     
  4. Zeov macrumors 6502a

    Zeov

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Location:
    Odense
    #4
    It's always been an expensive product if you look only at the specifications :)
     
  5. Pandamic thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2014
    #5
    I don't understand why their new models are so underpowered.

    The 2012 MBP seemed like pretty solid deals -- good price to performance ratio. They were perfect for students. They were quite affordable, were reliable so it would last throughout their undergrad and even grad studies. They were powerful -- which is what you mainly look for when paying premium price. They had adequate storage, which is important for any student and professional. They had discrete GPU, and while they weren't the best mobile GPU they were adequate enough for moderate gaming.

    The 2013 MBP has none of those things.

    ----------

    For $3000? Yes, all those things are quite underwhelming.
     
  6. yjchua95 macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2011
    Location:
    GVA, KUL, MEL (current), ZQN
    #6
    Nope, it's reasonably priced, especially since it has a PCIe SSD.

    You forget about the premium you pay for good design and a superb user experience.

    If you can't afford it, don't buy one. I can show you the door to Dell or HP if you want.

    Edit: http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/380056?baseline=379836

    The 2.6GHz i7 (Haswell rMBP) outperforms the 2.7GHz i7 (2012 MBP). Clock speed is not directly proportional to performance.
     
  7. Dekard, Jan 31, 2014
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2014

    Dekard macrumors 6502

    Dekard

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Location:
    Dallas, Texas
    #7
    Actually.. the 2013 meets 'ALL' of those points except your price point. I play BF4 on my rMBP regularly.. and it's pretty rough game for GPU's.. it sounds like you just can't get over the price point and it's understandable, they aren't cheap. But they are still beefy powerful laptops..

    I think the Macbook Air line is gearing itself more for the student, and hence the 'pro' name the macbook pro's are for the professional business folk.

    The $3200 rMBP is the one I got and it's the top of the line most expensive one available. So, yes it's expensive but it is planned to last me at least 4 years. (for my uses) others starts at $1199 which is still reasonable.
     
  8. Merode macrumors 6502

    Merode

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Location:
    Warszawa, Poland
    #8
    Go ahead, buy Dell. Just bring thicker wallet for the same quality - it's worse.
    2013 rMBPs are much better than 2012 rMBPs. Especially if you go for the top 15".
     
  9. yjchua95 macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2011
    Location:
    GVA, KUL, MEL (current), ZQN
    #9
    Oh and 512GB is adequate storage and is also decently priced, because it's a PCIe SSD, not a spinning HDD.
     
  10. Pandamic thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2014
    #10
    Correction: ONLY if you go for the top 15"
     
  11. yjchua95 macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2011
    Location:
    GVA, KUL, MEL (current), ZQN
    #11
    You forget that the PCIe SSD in the MacBook Pros justify the expensive prices.

    I don't think you have the foggiest idea of how fast a PCIe SSD performs.
     
  12. Merode macrumors 6502

    Merode

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Location:
    Warszawa, Poland
    #12
    In what way is lower 2013 15" worse than 2012 one? Please present me with benchmarks.
     
  13. Peace macrumors Core

    Peace

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
    #13
    It's simple. Don't buy one. It will make all of us and you happy.

    ;)
     
  14. disasterdrone macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    #14
    Adequate for what? Adequate for a consumer model, certainly, certainly not for many pro media users.
     
  15. trewyn15 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    #15
    No, not reasonably priced compared to competitors.

    Superb user experience? Right :rolleyes:

    How about Asus or HP, equal build quality, equally good operating system if you know how to use it.

    It all comes down to whether or not you want to pay the premium to be able to say you own an Apple product and/or really like OS X for some weird reason over Windows.
     
  16. alphaod macrumors Core

    alphaod

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2008
    Location:
    NYC
    #16
    If you don't like the price, the best you can do is not buy it.

    Complaining about it won't drop the price, so the best is to buy something you think is worth your money.
     
  17. panzer06 macrumors 68030

    panzer06

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Location:
    Kilrath
    #17
    I have to agree with you. I only have a Mac Mini now because the Apple laptops are sealed, can't be upgraded and cost way too much for what you get. Since I use the mini mainly for office, internet, e-mail etc I just like Macs for the OS and ease of use so fancy retina display doesn't really mean much. I use a Windows tablet for non-OS X compatible apps. For me Windows 8 has been stable and works well with all the Windows games. the 750m is a fine GPU but paying $3000 to get one is in no way acceptable to me.

    As others have said you don't need to buy it (I won't) but it would be nice if Apple offered more flexible mobile solutions at a more reasonable price.

    Cheers,
     
  18. MacDawg macrumors P6

    MacDawg

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Location:
    "Between the Hedges"
    #18
    You get what you pay for in my experience, and I have no issues with paying for my MBP

    Yep, the user experience on my MBP with Mavericks is superb
    As is the customer service I've always received from Apple and my Apple store
    (2 MBA's 1 MBP, 1 iPhone 5s, 1 iPhone 5, 2 iPad Mini, 1 iPad 3)

    I have never found the build quality of other laptops to be near as good, but that's just me I guess... personal opinion and preference

    OS? I use Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 both on a daily basis for work
    While they get the job done, I will always prefer my user experience with OSX
    When I have a choice, I use OSX
    In fact, my Dell laptop for work sits unused on my desk and I run Windows with VMware Fusion instead of using it
    I also have my Galaxy S3 work phone forwarded to my personal iPhone

    Bottom line OP... buy and use what you find useful and can afford
    For me, it is a MBP hands down
     
  19. eneisch macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #19
    Actually I think that Apple is competitively priced. The cost of any Windows PC with the similar specs (SSD, High Res Screen, etc.) are in the same ballpark.

    For Example:

    Samsung ATIV 9 Plus 13" with i7, 256GB SSD and 8GB RAM = $1799

    Macbook 13" with i7, 256 GB SSD and 8GB RAM = $1799

    Note that the Macbook has Iris graphics while Samsung has HD 4400. MacBook also has a faster PCIe SSD. Samsung does have a touchscreen for that price though.

    I believe most (if not all) ultrabook style computers are sealed and have non-removable batteries these days.
     
  20. KUguardgrl13 macrumors 68020

    KUguardgrl13

    Joined:
    May 16, 2013
    Location:
    Kansas, USA
    #20
    Consider what the price increase is covering: PCIe SSD, Haswell processor, retina display, and FREE OS upgrades for as long as the machine supports them. For the two machines I have, it's a $300 difference, but it's well worth it.
     
  21. blooperz macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    #21
    Check out Lenovo's higher end models, similar build quality to apple but better value for your money especially if you don't mind the windows OS. If you "must" have mac OS, than you'll have to pay the apple tax I'm afraid.
     
  22. leman macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    #22
    Dunno, a Dell XPS 15" with very similar specs (a slower CPU and SSD) costs $2,349.99 - compare this to Apple's $2,599.00 Its still a quite good deal for the money. Even despite the lack of the dGPU, the base 15" rMBP is quite good. Of course, if you are interested in gaming, a 2012 model would be a better choice.
     
  23. brdeveloper macrumors 68020

    brdeveloper

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Location:
    Brasil
    #23
    You forgot the main problem: "retina burner" display.

    ----------

    Retina display is not a selling point to me once you have to enter the screen lottery to hopefully get a good one.
     
  24. cheesyappleuser macrumors 6502a

    cheesyappleuser

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    Location:
    Portugal
    #24
    I can't really agree with you but in the BTO (which is almost always outrageously expensive).
    The Iris Pro performs rather nice (about like last year's 650M) and the i7 seems to be a beast to me.
    Plus, the 256GB are little storage but they're PCIe-SSDs. You don't get those on a standard PC, and boy they're fast!

    And, obviously, you pay the premium Apple price. Amazing software and hardware design don't come for free.
    But still, all in all these are great computers. You're underestimating the whole package (amazing battery life, slim and lightness, Retina display, SSD, etc.).
     
  25. Dekard macrumors 6502

    Dekard

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Location:
    Dallas, Texas
    #25
    I would guess it's more of a lottery in getting a screen that has issues, most people don't have issues with the screens, but some do.. I wouldn't say it's the majority of rMBPs
     

Share This Page