Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Uhhh... What?!??! iPhone 3rd Generation Pictures?!?!
- Thread starter Luke1robb
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
That's because there's only one unit. The second image is a contrast enhancement used to help show off the alleged front facing camera.
Alec
It looks exactly the same as the current 3G....
Yes, but with a mind-blowing 124.8 GB
Definite fake.
It's an exact image of the iPhone 3G next to it, just blurred up and changed a little with photoshop to show a front view camera.
It's an exact image of the iPhone 3G next to it, just blurred up and changed a little with photoshop to show a front view camera.
We've seen 32GB chips in production.
Though you are correct that no 128GB chips.
Phazer
Fake, just check the song number. If its a prototype, I highly doubt more than 100 songs would be there, they already know the iPod part of it works.
Also, Apple will not use Prototype 3.0 as a name, something more like Avalanche or Bloomingdale is more possible/plausible than Prototype.
Camera facing front I can see that going in, it means video calls and means AT&T can grasp some more revenue from that. 3.5G will most definitely be there. Other than that... not much.
I just want Real GPS and full HSDPA/HSUPA internals. I don't mind having 16GB, thats plenty for me. Now, something I terribly want is the old Aluminum look the iPhone had. That's something that I most definitely want.
Also, Apple will not use Prototype 3.0 as a name, something more like Avalanche or Bloomingdale is more possible/plausible than Prototype.
Camera facing front I can see that going in, it means video calls and means AT&T can grasp some more revenue from that. 3.5G will most definitely be there. Other than that... not much.
I just want Real GPS and full HSDPA/HSUPA internals. I don't mind having 16GB, thats plenty for me. Now, something I terribly want is the old Aluminum look the iPhone had. That's something that I most definitely want.
Even though the iPod touch is only available at a max of 32GB?
And a 64GB is expected to be released in February?
Still, not 128GB's.
Just proving out points more; since the iPod touch is well over a year from 128GB I doubt the iPhone will have 128GB for a couple of years.
I got a question for yall. Why can't Apple put a Hard Drive instead of Flash chips in there?
If they can, and it be allowed in the next iPhone, then can't we get 128GB
*Note, I think this is FAKE ALL THE WAY, I'm just wondering*
If they can, and it be allowed in the next iPhone, then can't we get 128GB
*Note, I think this is FAKE ALL THE WAY, I'm just wondering*
Actually, then we'd have the possibility of having a 240GB iPhone.
And the reason is because hard drives are thick, very think, compared to flash.
Flash is also a lot faster.
Its fake and i can explain why:
The screen on the second picture looks too bright, this is because it is a screenshot from an iphone which has the model number, and the capacity edited with a helvetica text box. Then skewed onto the original picture in photoshop. It has then been saved as a jpeg, compressing it even more, therefore decreasing the quality and making it look more grainy.
The screen on the second picture looks too bright, this is because it is a screenshot from an iphone which has the model number, and the capacity edited with a helvetica text box. Then skewed onto the original picture in photoshop. It has then been saved as a jpeg, compressing it even more, therefore decreasing the quality and making it look more grainy.
Also, they are more fragile and use more power, both of which would be undesirable in a mobile phone that customers expect to perform all day and night without recharging.
Exactly why we think it's fake.
The iPhone only has one slot for a NAND flash chip.
I don't even think they make 128GB NAND, well at least not at a reasonable price.