Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That is my other point of contention as well.

Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo all have App stores for their multimedia platforms.

Nobody seems to be having an issue with it.

But it’s bad when Apple does it.

When four manufacturers are doing the same thing and only one is being singled out, it’s looking more and more like a company out to hit a quick payday than them genuinely having a problem with walled gardens.

I personally would have a problem with Apple's walled gardens if it was a monopoly but its not. Android exists and its free for all, you choose to use iOS you are not forced. There is also other options + there is nothing stopping anyone from creating their own smartphone OS with apps they are just too lazy.

Nothing stopping Microsoft, Sony, Samsung, Huawei, Facebook, Oracle, Amazon...etc to build their own OS, they have the money and resources.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coredev
I personally would have a problem with Apple's walled gardens if it was a monopoly but its not. Android exists and its free for all, you choose to use iOS you are not forced. There is also other options + there is nothing stopping anyone from creating their own smartphone OS with apps they are just too lazy.

Nothing stopping Microsoft, Sony, Samsung, Huawei, Facebook, Oracle, Amazon...etc to build their own OS, they have the money and resources.
None of them could install their OS on an iPhone, though.
 
So macrumors moderators apparently flagged my Letter Kenny “to be fair” meme assuming it was meant as a provocation... I can only assume the moderator has never seen Letter Kenny, but since I was not offered any sort of chance to explain myself, “To be fair” is something that you simply say and sing anytime someone else says “to be fair”. It is not a provocation, affirmation or condemnation. It is simply a neutral good time. I was just simply adding pure joy to the conversation. To the moderator who sent me the message, I appreciate you for what you do for the community. Perhaps you may not see it as adding to the community, but sometimes these conversations can get a little too heated, and a brief period of calm and humor can sometimes be a welcome sight to keep the conversation civil and on track. Thank you.
All posts that consist only of an image get deleted. It was not content judgement.
 
Apple doesn't force anybody to do anything. A potential IOS dev, voluntarily joins the program by paying $99, and then can use a lot of Apple software collateral to get an app up and running. All without anybody holding the proverbial gun to someone's head.
Really??? You are going to talk about my statement saying Apple forces developers to go through them as being completely literal while talking about proverbial guns???
 
Really??? You are going to talk about my statement saying Apple forces developers to go through them as being completely literal while talking about proverbial guns???
Yep. I'm an ex-dev. Whether a dev chooses to sign up or not is the devs' business model. IOS is a walled garden, a dev has to make a choice to be in that ecosystem. Nobody is forcing anybody to do anything.
 
You wouldn’t walk into a retailer and tell them “hey before you opened up this store other companies had stores too with similar stock displayed in a similar way I think you owe it to them to stock their brands because you copied them.” And yet it seems like you are suggesting that opening a digital storefront and selling things is something that could be copyrightable?
I'm not sure your analogy is a good reply to what I said. And my reply was meant more for those claiming that Cydia just wants to leech the good idea and invention of Apple with their AppStore, I'm guessing because lots of people are ignorant to what Cydia was and how it opened new opportunities back then.

I'm not saying that a digital storefront is copyrightable or that we should have eternal gratitude for Cydia. But I don't think it's fair for them to be accused that they have no merits, when again, lots of tweaks which are now included in iOS were in Cydia first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InGen
Yep. I'm an ex-dev. Whether a dev chooses to sign up or not is the devs' business model. IOS is a walled garden, a dev has to make a choice to be in that ecosystem. Nobody is forcing anybody to do anything.
I am a dev... and for most people the choice is you are in that ecosystem or you don’t have a business.
 
I am a dev... and for most people the choice is you are in that ecosystem or you don’t have a business.
You can release the app on Android. I know many businesses that have their apps only on Android, and that is how their business is run.
 
Can you proved a quote for "Managed Device" please.

Have a good read....



First 3 lines when you setup your iPhone/ iPad for the first time:

”IMPORTANT: BY USING YOUR iPHONE, iPAD OR iPOD TOUCH (“DEVICE”), YOU ARE AGREEING TO BE BOUND BY THE FOLLOWING TERMS:”


Paragraph 1:

”whether in read only memory, on any other media or in any other form (the Original Apple Software and Apple Software Updates are collectively referred to as the “Apple Software”) are licensed, not sold, to you by Apple Inc. (“Apple”) for use only under the terms of this License.”


It goes on but that’s the crux of it.
 
Last edited:
HOWEVER: Since we actually do own the device itself, we should be allowed to delete iOS and install another os like Android if we want. This wouldn't affect Apple in any way, short of some warranty challenges. The hardware is great but clearly not everybody is onboard with the software.
Don't we see discussions here frequently that Apple does not innovate anymore, that other devices are a lot more advanced, that SamHuaMi is bringing this in-any-way better phone to market at half the price of an iPhone?
Personally I think for a majority of buyers the iOS is as much a factor in the buying decision as the hardware itself.

Also, if geeks around the world can deploy Linux on almost every device out there, why is it that there is no port to a jailbroken iPhone?
 
None of them could install their OS on an iPhone, though.
Nor should they. Apple is not the type of business that builds machines as an OEM and then bundles other's OS, like it is prevalent in the PC world, or even with Android. Apple's USP is this "we control the whole widget" thing. Now even going down to the processors in their Macs.
Since people around here like analogies so much, it would be like requiring Ford to make it possible to allow installation of a different manufacturer's engine in their cars.
 
Nor should they. Apple is not the type of business that builds machines as an OEM and then bundles other's OS, like it is prevalent in the PC world, or even with Android. Apple's USP is this "we control the whole widget" thing. Now even going down to the processors in their Macs.
Since people around here like analogies so much, it would be like requiring Ford to make it possible to allow installation of a different manufacturer's engine in their cars.
Right.

I'm just saying the other person's point that people could write their own OS is kinda moot when that OS cannot be installed (without a jailbreak or Apple's blessing).
 
HOWEVER: Since we actually do own the device itself, we should be allowed to delete iOS and install another os like Android if we want. This wouldn't affect Apple in any way, short of some warranty challenges. The hardware is great but clearly not everybody is onboard with the software.

You are free to go ahead and try.

As has been stated above, Apple is under no obligation to go out of their way to make it easy for you to do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deevey and I7guy
Because developers will pull their apps from the App Store?
Ok. Then you should be able to produce several examples of how the ability to side load apps in Android has led many major developers to pull their apps from Google Play.

As in, if all you can come up with is Fortnite, then....
 
And ? They could make their own hardware too, y'know .. like Apple did.

Oh wait, a couple of them did try that
Sure, but in practice, having more than two software platforms is hardly tenable. Few software companies are going to write their app for a third platform.
 
Ok. Then you should be able to produce several examples of how the ability to side load apps in Android has led many major developers to pull their apps from Google Play.
On iOS and the App Store this has not happened for obvious reasons, but just look at the discussion about the new "nutrition labels". It's not so far fetched that eg Facebook would at least try to ditch the App Store for other distribution means if that would mean less scrutiny for their tracking habits.
 
Sure, but in practice, having more than two software platforms is hardly tenable. Few software companies are going to write their app for a third platform.
Well thats an issue for the imaginary Phone/OS manufacture to to deal with. If the platform is compelling enough and came with the same level of developer support as Android / Apple, there would be a market and they would write apps for it.

A company like facebook has the resources to make their own device happen, but prefer to moan about others locking down their OS.

Time for someone like Epic to put its money where its mouth is and release a device with the Cydia Appstore installed as an alternative to iOS and see how well it does.

Thing is that no-one wants to, they just want a free ride on the coat-tails of Apples' Successes.
 
Why the incredulity? It already doesn't allow pirated apps. A user has to go out of their way through unofficial channels to pirate via Cydia, and that's only possible because a user has to jailbreak their phone in order to even use Cydia thanks to Apple.

At any rate, why do you not trust yourself to install whatever software you want on your own phone? Why do you think every other iPhone user should be shackled in the same way?
I was responding to your statement that "If Apple allowed other app stores and opened up a means for third party software to install apps, you wouldn't be able to pirate on Cydia".

I'm an App Developer with a paid app on the Apple App Store since 2007. It was heavily pirated during the Cydia/Jailbreak times. Cydia didn't do anything to stop pirating from happening. I have no reason to believe that Cydia as an 'official 3rd-party store' in any way would actively prevent or fight pirating. That's why I asked if you were kidding cause I can't take that serious.
 
Have a good read....



First 3 lines when you setup your iPhone/ iPad for the first time:

”IMPORTANT: BY USING YOUR iPHONE, iPAD OR iPOD TOUCH (“DEVICE”), YOU ARE AGREEING TO BE BOUND BY THE FOLLOWING TERMS:”


Paragraph 1:

”whether in read only memory, on any other media or in any other form (the Original Apple Software and Apple Software Updates are collectively referred to as the “Apple Software”) are licensed, not sold, to you by Apple Inc. (“Apple”) for use only under the terms of this License.”


It goes on but that’s the crux of it.
Understood. Nowhere do I see that I have agreed that the device is "managed".
 
They need to get "approval" to release said games/software from MS/SONY/Nintendo, they can't just upload it into their marketplace.

Yes. Exactly. See below:

Unlike Apple they aren't part of a duopoly and it's much harder to impact the marketplace in an unfair manner the way Apple can with decisions on iOS. That's a key part of anti-trust laws. With smartphone OS's there are only two choices, iOS and Android. In the gaming marketplace there are Sony Playstation, Xbox, Nintendo, Windows, and macOS at a minimum. None of those entities has broad control over a huge chunk of the market. As of May 2020, iOS accounted for over 50% of the smartphone OS market in the US.

• Smartphone OS U.S. market share 2020 | Statista

If Sony says you can't publish something, you're not automatically locked out of 50% of the gaming market. If Apple says no, you are automatically locked out of ~50% of the market, with only one other OS as an option.

That's my point, generally speaking, though it's getting around to it in a weird way.

That approval process for XBL or PSN is MUCH harder than Apple's for the App Store, which is why Apple's "Oh, we don't allow other App Stores because they wouldn't be as high quality" is a bunk argument. They're already the 2nd lowest bar, just ahead of Google Play.

The additional approval process for xCloud is even higher.

Apple is abusing their position.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.