It would not bother me if the fbi could get in to phones they confiscated with a warrant, wouldn’t bother me if Apple helped them do it… I just consider this a different thing altogether because we are talking about warrantless surveillanceI don’t agree with this. Apple says they will not scan photos if iCloud is turned off but if they can scan photos with iCloud turned on then they can scan those same photos with iCloud turned off.
I think you’re confusing what Apple says they will do with what Apple is capable of doing. Those are two different things. Apple may be may have all the intention to do what they claim they’re going to do if you believe they’re being honest. The problem is Apple will comply with the demands of any country they do business in. If they have the capability to do something even it’s not something they say they’re going to do but just having that capability means they will do it when a Country demands they do so.
I think I mentioned it in earlier post but the FBI demanded Apple unlock certain iPhones. They didn’t and I think still don’t have that capability. If they had that capability even if it was for a different purpose say for instance they had the capability to unlock your iPhone if you forgot the pin number. It’s the same here while Apple may honestly intend this for CSAM (which I don’t believe) it will be used for other things by the demands of certain countries.
Don’t confuse what they’re saying they’re going to do with what capabilities they have. Right now after this update they will have the capability to remotely access photos and messages on your iPhone. It’s possible they have more access but we don’t know this. How they use that access is going to depend on the situation.