Apple must have been targeting Thunderbolt 5 specs when designing the M4 generation of chips, in which TB5 is “only” still on PCIe gen 4 for data. Not saying Apple couldn’t have used gen 5 for the internal storage, but it’d complicate the design so they probably will leave that work for M5 or even M6 down the road. Especially if and when a new Mac Pro happens, there are PCIe card slots to care about as well.No Raid. Just a Samsung 9100Pro on PCIE 5. Like I said, I did think the M4 was running PCIE 5 or at least the 8TB on the M2 Max would be faster. I saw many video showing the bigger Apple SSD getting really fast but never saw one with 8TB. Give the price of the 8TB from Polysoft, I am contemplating selling the M2 Studio and putting in the difference and buying the M4. For now the Hackintosh serves my needs but Tahoe is its last dance so a Studio is the best way forward. My current Studio with external SSD is okay but slow for what I need, the internal SSD is only 512GB.
View attachment 2529843
On the Mac Studio storage cards, the biggest sequential speed increase has always come from maximizing the number of NAND chips on the two daughter card boards, and the upper limit has always been 8. With the M3 Ultra having a 16TB config, many speculated may be the limit had been raised to 16 NANDs, but turns out it is still 8, Apple just starts using 2TB modules instead. So the end result is increase of capacity but no increase in seq. speed.
AFAIK, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB, 16TB configs all use 8 NANDs. In other words once you reach 2TB you are already at the higher end of possible seq. speed in the context of storage channels, the extra speed you can get from real world usage of the 4/8/16 comes from leg room in each NAND cell.