USB 2.0? Really?

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by scrapple, Apr 13, 2010.

  1. scrapple macrumors regular

    scrapple

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2004
  2. Sneakz macrumors 65816

    Sneakz

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    #2
    Some people complain about every little thing, don't they?
     
  3. Matthew Yohe macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
  4. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #5
    13" and 15" only have 2 USB ports now.... 17" still has three though
     
  5. CalMin macrumors 6502a

    CalMin

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    #6
    +1. Why does everyone want this so badly? The use case is very limited.
     
  6. darngooddesign macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    #7
    Real men use Firewire. :D
     
  7. andiwm2003 macrumors 601

    andiwm2003

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #8
    i thought the 15" always had only 2 USB ports?

    i more surprised that the SSD prices didn't come down. still 650 bucks for 256GB.

    all in all an update as expected. no need to upgrade but nice if you are going to buy anyway.

    because in three years you want to have a USB 3 port because all accessories will have one.
     
  8. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #9
    Hmm, you're right, my bad. Thought they had three but looks like they only had two anyway
     
  9. Eidorian macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    #10
  10. m85476585 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    #11
    I'm not upgrading because there is no better option for fast disk access on the new models.

    USB2: ~35MB/sec
    Firewire 800: ~77MB/sec

    My 1TB external drive: ~110-130MB/sec over eSATA. Currently I use an extremely buggy eSATA expresscard. If the new MBPs had either a USB/eSATA combo port, USB3, FW3200 (not likely), or LightPeak (I'm hoping for this one in the next update), I would upgrade. Without even an expresscard slot, a new 15" would be a downgrade for me.

    I like the higher screen resolution on the 15", but that alone isn't enough for me to spend $1000 on an upgrade (since my current MBP is worth about $1000 if I sell it)
     
  11. vipergts2207 macrumors 65816

    vipergts2207

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    #12
    This thread is hilarious. You obviously have no clue. Had you done an iota of research on USB 3.0 you would see that Intel will not be supporting it until 2011. How you see this as Apple's fault I have no idea. :confused::rolleyes: Same thing with people complaining about C2D in the 13" MBP. Apple had 3 choices. Use i3/5 and crappy Intel integrated graphics, use i3/5 and discrete GPU's like the higher end MBPs (this would have been cost prohibitive on the 13" MBPs though) or use C2D and much nicer nvidia integrated graphics. None of those choices are as good as what Apple probably really would have like to have done which is i3/5 and integrated nvidia GPUs, but Intel would be to blame for that one.
     
  12. m85476585 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    #13
    It doesn't matter if Intel supports it. Apple could add a dedicated USB3 chip, which probably wouldn't cost them a whole lot. How do you think MBPs support Firewre, Ethernet, and Audio?

    I think Intel is clearly delaying support of USB 3 in the hopes that they can get Lightpeak ready soon. By not adding USB3 on their own, it looks like Apple is supporting Intel's move. That's fine since LP is tecnically superior to USB, but in the mean time, can't we at least get a combo USB/eSATA port?
     
  13. Eidorian macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    #14
    The last time I checked a USB 3.0 controller ran somewhere in the $3-6 ballpark.

    It's even more crippling when USB 2.0 is going to be the fastest general purpose external I/O bus you're going to see for a computer you're buying in 2010. An eSATA/USB port would be a god send.

    FireWire 800 is sadly very 2003.
     
  14. FSMBP macrumors 68020

    FSMBP

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    #15
    Get a blog.
     
  15. m85476585 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    #16
    And USB 2 is very 2001.
     
  16. bcrguy macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Location:
    Burlington Ontario Canada
    #17
    so worry about it in 3 years??
     
  17. m85476585 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    #18
    If most computers don't have USB 3 ports (which would happen if every computer company worked like Apple), there wouldn't be any USB accessories because no one would be able to use them, except in backwards-compatibility mode, which would be pointless. Computers need to support it before accessory makers will, and it makes more sense to pay a bit extra for USB3 on a $2000 computer to "future proof" it than on a $20 mouse, since you are likely to keep the computer for a lot longer.

    Apple used to innovate with their computers, doing things like adding Firewire 800 and dropping the floppy and optical (in the MBA at least) drives ahead of the curve.

    These days they are only reacting to trends. When they dropped FW on one model (I don't remember which one), they claimed that it was because "most camcorders now support USB2). They haven't dropped optical drives or even made them optional in the MBP line yet, even though the space could be used for another hard drive or a larger battery. They dropped expresscard because they claim "most cameras use SD, and few users use expresscard".
     
  18. Alvi macrumors 65816

    Alvi

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Location:
    Mars
    #19
    Really? i guess your iPod/iPhone has 3.0, most of the HDD's have 3.0, i understand you want it to future-proof it but some say 3.0 won't even be the thing, and since MacBook Pro's get updated every other day i guess the next gen or the other gen will have 3.0 or lightpeak


    EDIT: Ad really? future proof it? MacBook Pros last 3 years because of Apple care, than they breakdown and fixing them is as expansive as a new computer, and that's said by a MacBook Pro owner
     
  19. iSax1234 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2010
    Location:
    Virginia
  20. Relznuk macrumors 6502

    Relznuk

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Location:
    UT, USA
    #21
    +1. Apple is never so swift to support new transfer interfaces.
     
  21. KingYaba macrumors 68040

    KingYaba

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2005
    Location:
    Up the irons
    #22
    If you're putting that money in a Macbook Pro you bet I'd like to have USB 3.0. These are machines I would expect to use for several years and USB 3.0 devices will surely come during this Macbook Pro's lifespan.

    No kidding.
     
  22. BittenApple macrumors 6502a

    BittenApple

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    #23
    I came and read this for the lulz. Thanks OP, like pointed out before Intel is not even supporting 3.0 until next year.
     
  23. Repo macrumors 6502a

    Repo

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    #24
    Yeah, and they're so close together you usually can only use two at a time. :(
     
  24. thejadedmonkey macrumors 604

    thejadedmonkey

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Location:
    Pa
    #25
    That's one of the reasons I don't like the UMBP (besides the hideous colors). My MBP has a single USB port on the left, and a single USB port on the right. Now a computer this expensive should have 3 or 4 USB ports, but at least I can use both at the same time :apple: FTW

    Oh yeah. And on topic, any $2000 computer should have USB 3.0 by now. Especially when computers 1/2 the price of the MBP have USB 3.0 and Blu-ray
     

Share This Page