Do not bet on it anything of value - APPLE is the biggest tax cheater in the world!!!
Wesley snipes and Lauren hill are tax cheats. Apple just plans well.
Do not bet on it anything of value - APPLE is the biggest tax cheater in the world!!!
I guess the system wasn't broken when the kangaroo court awarded Apple $1B for rounded corners, but now they want to President to step in for a valid violation where Apple is using a technology without paying for it. And while we are talking about fair pricing, it seems to me that Apple wanted some $10+/phone for those GUI gimmicks...
Do not bet on it anything of value - APPLE is the biggest tax cheater in the world!!!
If what you said is true then the ITC would never have agreed to the ban because Samsung is required to offer fair and reasonable licensing fees. Do you have a source to back that up?
.....Everyone should make the best product they can, and do their best not to copy, without suing and making it all about the lawsuit.
How is this possible? Without Apple no modern smart phones at all. What the heck was Samsung doing so big at 2007 that they think they have a huge patent deal?
Our current president will certainly intervene if he thinks it will help him politically.
Because the current patents are in question, they cannot act on this until the questions are answered in THE CURRENT lawsuits, in the JUDICIAL BRANCH. The US ITC cannot determine if patents were infringed until a federal court, the Judicial branch, decides if patents were infringed on by the current laws put in place by the Legislative branch.
If the US ITC is able to ban imports based on a decision they make; and the decisions and questions are working its ways through courts; THEN they are overstepping their boundaries and acting like a court without any oversight. They are setting a very dangerous president.
The import ban needs to be blocked. Even IF (not though) Apple did infringe on Samsung, the ban needs to be blocked.
The US ITC falls under the Executive branch. The Executive branch carries out our daily business according to the current laws.
Because the current patents are in question, they cannot act on this until the questions are answered in THE CURRENT lawsuits, in the JUDICIAL BRANCH. The US ITC cannot determine if patents were infringed until a federal court, the Judicial branch, decides if patents were infringed on by the current laws put in place by the Legislative branch.
If the US ITC is able to ban imports based on a decision they make; and the decisions and questions are working its ways through courts; THEN they are overstepping their boundaries and acting like a court without any oversight. They are setting a very dangerous president.
I know the court system sucks, but it does protect us (pick one{All/Most/Many/Some/Few/None) of the time.
sorry but the people that actually live here want their president focused on things that actually matter.
except once the patent is granted it is presumed valid.
I don't know that the question is whether or not apple is using the patent as much as it is what should they pay to license it.
Yea, and Bush wouldn't have intervened if he didn't think it will help him politically.
I am not a democrat, but I know it's not about our "current" president; all politicians are the same regardless which party they come from
Sounds lofty, but do you honestly think, that'll work in the dog-eat-dog real world? After all, there are Billions at stake here. With mission statements like that, company's could be having a patent free-for-all.
Wesley snipes and Lauren hill are tax cheats. Apple just plans well.
So we have a massive NSA/CIA scandal. Still fighting at least one war overseas. Messed up economy and this asshat wants the president to worry about celll phones?
Isn't that what's happening already? Companies are absorbing lawsuits and doing whatever the heck they want? What's 100 billion when yor profit is 300 billon?
Not according to laws of countries. Perhaps you have a higher source?
Verizon is asking this because it will F them big time if it goes through,they have a huge contract with apple and need to sell billions of iphones this year and next year and Verizon uses 3g cdma tech on there network and guess witch phones will be getting banned by this patent dispute?