I think they’re trying to make us all aware T-mobile gives you free Netflix, which not everyone may know. I didn’t until I started looking into switching to them. It’s a nice perkI'm trying to understand. This thread is about Verizon and it's offerings to it's customers. You don't have Verizon. You get t-mobile and netflix. We're all happy for you. But why come into this thread to brag about how you don't care about those who use Verizon. I just don't understand.
Definitely. The current business model for streaming isn't profitable without advertising. It's only a matter of time before there is no Ad Free streaming. Honestly they could do away with Ad Free tomorrow across the industry and what could anyone do about it? People aren't going to just stop watching TV, anymore than they can just stop eating.
I think there will but they will be more and more expensive. They know there is a demographic that refuses to watch anything with ads, and as long as they make it more expensive than what they’d get from the ad space it’s still more profitable (plus they aren’t wasting bandwidth sending ads, which has to save them something).
If they take away an ad-free option pirating will come back in a big way
Actually, yes. Netflix has turned to junk over the last 2-3 years anyways. Much more value in Disney or other services.
Wait the ad supported tier doesn't have all of netflix's content?! That's insaneIts a real shame that the add supported tier is quite restricted in its content. I wonder how many sign up not realizing this…
Ah, I do love me a person who thinks their info is secureActually, yes. Netflix has turned to junk over the last 2-3 years anyways. Much more value in Disney or other services.
I agree.
People paid for watching commercials for decades with standard Cable TV. Amazing how consumer expectations have changed in the internet era. We now want so much more for so much less.
Absolutely this - while there may be quality content on other services, Netflix content is more entertaining for a general audience, and covers all age and interest demographics. It also has the best range of international content. Disney+ catalogue is either older content or endless spinoffs of their IP - there is very little original content on there.Kind of depends what you want. I always liked Netflix for the comedy specials, almost nowhere else to find them now.
Absolutely this - while there may be quality content on other services, Netflix content is more entertaining for a general audience, and covers all age and interest demographics. It also has the best range of international content. Disney+ catalogue is either older content or endless spinoffs of their IP - there is very little original content on there.
Personally, I have never sent a Cable TV company a single check or payment. I never will pay for ads.I find it hard to believe that you've never payed for cable TV that also runs ads?
In some regions at least… my brother had the ad tier and some TV shows were unavailable on that plan :/Wait the ad supported tier doesn't have all of netflix's content?! That's insane
Personally, I have never sent a Cable TV company a single check or payment. I never will pay for ads.
When you put it that way it makes the option look insane. 👍👍Either it's ad-free, or it has ads and its free. I refuse to pay to watch ads.
Sounds like you haven’t payed but have watched your share of commercials on TV. And what about YouTube and the internet in general? But I get it. I’ve met a few weirdos that actually like commercials. I don’t understand that at all but we’ve all been trained already so I think you’ll be just fine if all streaming services eventually become ad-driven.Personally, I have never sent a Cable TV company a single check or payment. I never will pay for ads.
It can be the "ad-filled" plans can subsidize it for the ad-free folks.I think there will but they will be more and more expensive. They know there is a demographic that refuses to watch anything with ads, and as long as they make it more expensive than what they’d get from the ad space it’s still more profitable (plus they aren’t wasting bandwidth sending ads, which has to save them something).
If they take away an ad-free option pirating will come back in a big way
On principle, I do NOT agree with this. For me, I just want the experience to be decent. I understand that everyone has different tolerances towards ads (length per ad, how many total # ads there are, where they get inserted, what they are.. especially political ads, how often they repeat the same one). For me, Hulu is a prime counterexample where even if they, paid me money, to use it... I wouldn't. Let alone if it was free.
As for what we refer to as "double dipping"... they've run some expenses and determined that ad-revenue alone isn't enough for some of these services. Not like why some business venues have a cover charge. Or why despite how pricy some Apple products can be, basic accessories and other stuff costs extra $$.
I've paid for cable in the past, but I cut the cord around 2012 and haven't looked back. A huge reason for cutting the cord was ads - I realized how insane it is to pay $100/month to watch channels that show 5-7 minutes of ads per 30-minute episode.I find it hard to believe that you've never payed for cable TV that also runs ads?
Then I'll go back to sailing the high seas. My principal can be revised and it still rhymes: Ad-free, or ads and it's free. And if the service doesn't offer, then it's a pirates life for me!Exactly. They never discount the plan without ads because the point of these discounts is to get you to watch the ads.
Now we enter endgame. Mark my words, within a few years there will no longer be plans without ads. Exactly the same pattern that happened with cable TV.