Verizon vs. AT&T- CNET

[RebeccaL]

Do that test in PR and the results will be the reverse.

 

[teenwith3i]

Great AT&T speeds

AT&T is great. use voice & data all the time, seems to be a part of the iphone experience to me. No way id ever switch to verizon for 1mbps. never had a dropped call on AT&T, but if do its a lot easier to touch "call back" than it is to have to call someone back if they ask you to give them directions, or if you are in the park or on a bus and on a call with someone and they ask you to look at a picture on facebook while your talking.

 

[beret9987]

Ummm, I live in LA. 2 Homes, one in Malibu, the other off Wilshire. Never once have I seen speeds drop below 1.8mbs down....

I work in Burbank too, great speeds there also.

Whats your point?

I hate you. Lived in SF and worked in San Jose and the last time I was on ATT was an extremely traumatic experience for me, dropped calls, lack of data... It was like this last time in parts of San Jose too if memory serves me correctly(just asking friends). Glad its coming to VZW! Might not be as fast, but I'm willing to give it up for dependability.

 

[Mark Booth]

This CNet test is a nicely done test that's applicable only FOR PEOPLE LIVING IN OR VISITING SAN FRANCISCO.

Their results are NOT indicative of the majority of the cities in the US. In the vast majority of the cities, AT&T's data speed is dramatically faster than Verizon. Now that plenty of Verizon folks have iPhones in their hands, just read the messages being posted in this forum.

This topic should read: Verizon vs. AT&T IN SAN FRANCISCO!

My sincere condolences to everyone living in San Francisco. Frankly, data speeds for BOTH AT&T and Verizon suck in your city! The price to be paid for too few cell sites for a given population!

Mark

 

[wordoflife]

Good info for the people in San Francisco.

My speeds here are faster than both the results of AT&T and Verizon combined in San Francisco.

 

[seenew]

New what? St. who? Are those even real towns? All I heard is they are villages with some rednecks living in and about.

Those are all major U.S. Cities

Apparently someone lives under a rock. As per calling the world's third busiest port, Florida's biggest city, and the 4th largest urban area of the Midwest redneck villages, I think someone needs to do some inner tourism or needs some patriotic sense knocked into them. As well as stop posting and hit the books kid.

Wow, are you from North America? Hell, are you from Earth? New Orleans has nearly 1.3 million in their metro and St. Louis has nearly 2.9 million people. Those are MAJOR cities, azz.

seems MR users have an awful lot of trouble with sarcasm reception. Wonder if Verizon or AT&T is better in that area?

 

[Looon]

cnet is garbage nobody cares what they say all of their comparisons are total jokes

 

[chestvrg]

New what? St. who? Are those even real towns? All I heard is they are villages with some rednecks living in and about.

San Francisco is my hometown ok and it's a beautiful multi-cultural city (home to the Twin Peaks, mission dolores, Golden Gate Bridge, BART, techies, Castro street, the Presidio, the piramid, Alcatraz, Lombard nightlife, Bay Area tourism and the beautiful weather of SF)

...and I live in Miami which is a devercified city with beautiful beaches (we have Miami Beach here, home of so much tourism, Florida Int'l University, University of Miami, Miami Sequarium) none if these two cities are villages at least, they are cities, big big cities.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[JD914]

cnet is garbage nobody cares what they say all of their comparisons are total jokes

You don't know much of anything, do you?

 

[Looon]

You don't know much of anything, do you?

That's a nice statement to make based on one post of mine that you've read. I assume you don't know much about anything either. See I can make stupid statements without facts too.