My experience with Wifi Calling on Bell has been poor. Often have calls where the other end can't hear anything I say. It happens when the Internet is tied up with anything else, I disabled the feature after a few annoying weeks.
Those are the only phones ATT enabled wifi calling for at the time.But why not the iPhone 6 and 6s at the same time? AT&T had no problems doing so.
That's cool unfortunatly in att you are still paying even on wifi.They are. Republic Wireless has had wifi calling as one of their main features since inception. They're on Sprint's network. My 9 yr old has a Moto G on Republic. Her bill is $10 bucks a month; primarily because of the wifi calling ability. She pays her own bill.
So how does Apple having most money play into Samsung getting this feature from Verizon first?Yep. It's all about money. For Verizon, for Samsung, for APPLE. Out of those three, which one has the MOST money? It's the reason we still have 16GB base iPhones.
So how does Apple having most money play into Samsung getting this feature from Verizon first?
What recent shenanigans?Verizon really treats Mac
Verizon tends to treat Apple and customers as third party citizens. Look at the recent shenanigans they have been implanting to Apple customers.
Rooting it is an option?I used a Note 4 for a few weeks. The verizon branding is EVERYWHERE. Hardware, and so much crap you can't delete in the software. I'm sure they have incentives to push the galaxy over the iPhone.
This!They are. Republic Wireless has had wifi calling as one of their main features since inception. They're on Sprint's network. My 9 yr old has a Moto G on Republic. Her bill is $10 bucks a month; primarily because of the wifi calling ability. She pays her own bill.
I don't know where you live but AT&T is NOT as good as Verizon in much or even most of the country except for cities larger that 100,000.
So please don't claim that Verizon isn't tops in coverage from rural areas.
Why is it taking Verizon so long? The other carriers activated it for all eligible phones at once.
So how does Apple having most money play into Samsung getting this feature from Verizon first?
This statement seems a bit like hyperbole to me.Nothing, and that's the point. The implication that Verizon limited testing and Samsung paid for early access makes them bad companies is ridiculous. Apple has been significantly limiting their hardware for a very long time because of profits.
Rooting it is an option?
Nothing, and that's the point. The implication that Verizon limited testing and Samsung paid for early access makes them bad companies is ridiculous. Apple has been significantly limiting their hardware for a very long time because of profits.
It would be 9.2 and I don't think so. Haven't heard any rumors about that happeningMaybe iOS 9.3 is being released early next year.
Well Samsung has to do something now that they're going down the tubes.Maybe Samsung paid them to promote their S6 devices.
Why is it ridiculous that those kinds of business deals have been around for a long time?Nothing, and that's the point. The implication that Verizon limited testing and Samsung paid for early access makes them bad companies is ridiculous. Apple has been significantly limiting their hardware for a very long time because of profits.
Because for many it does a good job and perhaps better than some other carriers?It beats me why anyone still uses Verizon.
I've switched to T-Mobile ages ago and have been so much happier. And T-Mobile is generally cheaper. And it's had Wi-Fi calling for a long time now.