Or act like LOGICAL thinking adults and demand that the phone, REGARDLESS of cost, works like a CELL PHONE should because it's being advertised, first and foremost, as a cell phone that we are tied to paying a monthly contract for service. That means get a signal.
I don't know, I consider myself a pretty logical person. I got an iPhone 4 on launch day and I do think it works as advertised, even though I can reproduce the reception issue if I try.
If you pick the phone up and turn it on, it gets a signal. If you hold it a certain way, it goes down. So what? The same thing happens on
many other mobile phones. Those phones never advertised that the signal could be impaired by holding it a certain way, and the iPhone didn't advertise it either. That's because it's a known limitation of cell phones. But that's not even the biggest problem here. The real issue is that a bumper is not a signal fixer.
If bumper makes the signal better, then it's a side-effect of a product that's designed for something completely different (protecting the phone). People here want to get a free $30 product because they're having a problem with something else. They don't care what they get, they just want "free stuff" because they believe they have been wronged in some way. This is an attitude I disagree with.
So I say "buy it yourself" because if you want a bumper, you should pay for it. If you want a phone that doesn't have a signal issue, you should return your iPhone 4 and opt for an alternative phone. No one "owes you a bumper". The sense of entitlement on this forum is getting ridiculous.