not only is this trojan laughable, it's not very widespread. i have spent time actively looking for it and have yet to find it. so sad
Good thing I use Firefox![]()
The ZDNet team has devoted more pixels to this relatively lame attack than to the 40,000 currently active malware exploits on the Windows platform. Thank God for them and Ed Bott, without which we'd still be in the cruel care of the megalomaniacal Apple. /sarcasm
However, they take this video, and that will only mean more variations on this devilish attack!
It's true, we should beware. Give a free iOS device to all those who can't understand the simple measures you have to use to defend yourself against this one.
Why do people think that Firefox is immune to this? It is not.
The flaw is in the user.
Whether using Safari or Firefox, flawed users can easily install the MacDefender malware.
Protip: No anti-malware package on Windows, Mac, Linux or whatever can detect a virus for which they don't have signatures for. XProtect was updated to detect the A variant of the trojan as well as auto update itself, (then the B variant was released) so the B variant may already be detected by XProtect.
Yes, you're understanding it right. As is the case with 100% of all Mac OS X malware that exists in the wild (which is only a handful of trojans), nothing can infect your Mac unless you deliberately, intentionally, actively install it.I haven't been paying THAT close attention to this story, but I didn't realize that you had to be completely naive and gullible (no offense to any reading this that fell for it) to get nailed. I thought it happened more in the background. It looks like you pretty much have to open up the door to your computer and invite the hacker in and offer him or her a beer.
Am I understanding this right? You have to fairly pro-actively install this on your computer, it doesn't happen behind the scenes like Microshaft products do?
That makes no difference, since this lame threat is not browser-specific.Good thing I use Firefox![]()
Antivirus software isn't required to defeat this threat. It can be easily thwarted by an informed, careful user.OS X systems rarely have anti-viruses installed on them, and the Mac Defender was able to slip through OS X's rather dire malware detecting system and infect systems.
False. Mac OS X is not immune to viruses. There just aren't any in the wild.I know OS X cannot get a true virus,
This is the case with all malware that exists in the wild. None of it can affect Mac OS X unless the user actively installs it.Wow, you have to hit INSTALL to get infected? From how it was reported, it sounded like it was some sort of automatic thing. Sure, it doesn't require a password to install, but after seeing this I'd say you really DO need to be an idiot to install this.
I still would not like it (there is always the case of false positives), I would find it confusing if webpages get closed automatically.Well I guess closing all windows would be a bit extreme, but they could make use of Apples sandboxing technology and close just the tab that the download started in. That sounds a bit more reasonable, no?
Well, it took Apple only about a week to respond (and from now on only 24 h, the same interval in which Windows anti-virus apps are updated).And I think the whole big "hoo-har" over the Mac Defender all spans down to the fact that if it was a Windows malware program for Windows, the user's antivirus would have picked it up and nothing more would have been said. Unfortunately, OS X systems rarely have anti-viruses installed on them, and the Mac Defender was able to slip through OS X's rather dire malware detecting system and infect systems.
It's bit like somebody knocking at your window while you look out, flashing a fantasy badge (or declaring the landlord is sending him) and saying he is an anti-burglary expert and you need better window locks and he will install them for you.It looks like you pretty much have to open up the door to your computer and invite the hacker in and offer him or her a beer.
Because Firefox won't automatically open and launch the thing, making it look "official" or as part of the OS to non-savvy users. I haven't heard of anyone using Firefox being duped by this, because the user would have to go into the downloads folder, find something they don't recognize, and open it just to get to the point where Safari users who have "open safe downloads" enabled would be.
Overall you are right though, this all on the user.
That's the address of Protected Domain Services, which handles private website registration. They don't own the site. Instead, the owners of the site register through them, to keep their identity private.Registered to:
125 Rampart Way
Suite 300
Denver
CO
80230
US
Phone: +1.7202492374
I posted this post in another thread, but I think it suits here as well. This is just my opinion.
We are currently witnessing some real effort of malware designers for Macs. And I think the whole big "hoo-har" over the Mac Defender all spans down to the fact that if it was a Windows malware program for Windows, the user's antivirus would have picked it up and nothing more would have been said. Unfortunately, OS X systems rarely have anti-viruses installed on them, and the Mac Defender was able to slip through OS X's rather dire malware detecting system and infect systems.
As much as I hate to admit it (I always love saying smugly that Macs don't get viruses to my Windows using friends,) we are seeing a large interest in OS X and malware. Even Apple are panicking slightly, hence the quick update enhancing OS X's malware detecting system. What we have now, essentially, is an Antivirus integrated in the OS. I think we will be seeing a lot more of this malware for OS X in the future. It's happened. This is what I'd call widespread, and I don't think it's going to stop anytime soon.
Apple now have a choice. Admit that OS X isn't as squeaky clean as they like to, or lock down OS X like iOS (but run the risk of upsetting a lot of X users.)
DISCLAIMER: By virus, I mean all types of malware. I know OS X cannot get a true virus, but such occurrence is also rare on Windows now. I was using virus in the generic sense, like a layman would.
Now that I've seen the video I have to say I'm very disappointed. I expected something much more sophisticated. Hell, I could have written this in a day!
i am at awe at how stupid and computer illiterate you have to be to fall for this...
Was it Norton? Or McAfee? Or Avast?
If I were the suspicious type, I'd suspect that the anti-virus vendors have an interest in maximizing the number of viruses and phishing attacks. Just a thought.
Oh, and it might seem just a little too convenient that MacDefender hit the news right before Avast announced their app. Coincidence?
Was it Norton? Or McAfee? Or Avast?
If I were the suspicious type, I'd suspect that the anti-virus vendors have an interest in maximizing the number of viruses and phishing attacks. Just a thought.
Oh, and it might seem just a little too convenient that MacDefender hit the news right before Avast announced their app. Coincidence?
you just need a brain, a thing most computer users (Mac, PC and anything else) don't have nowdays.