Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,590
40,761


Recent reports suggest that there are now no redesigned Apple Vision headsets in active development, with the company's focus pivoting decisively to smart glasses.

apple-vision-pro-orange.jpg

When Apple announced the Vision Pro in mid-2023, it described the device as the dawn of "spatial computing," a new paradigm that would eventually rival the iPhone in importance. With a $3,499 starting price, intricate design and brand new operating system, and a clear focus on premium early adopters, the headset was never expected to be mass-market from day one. Yet even by Apple's standards, enthusiasm cooled far faster than anticipated, and the company's once-ambitious multi-year roadmap has now all but collapsed, according to rumors.

Apple's Original Plan

Soon after the launch of the Vision Pro, Apple is believed to have shifted focus to the "Vision Air," designed to bring spatial computing to a wider audience thanks to a lighter, thinner, and dramatically cheaper headset.

Apple-Vision-Pro-2-Feature-2.jpg

The target was to cut both weight by over 40% and price by around 50%, finally making mixed-reality viable for mainstream buyers. The Vision Air would use lower-cost display panels and simplified optics, while dropping some non-essential aspects and improving ergonomics.

At the high end, Apple reportedly envisioned a redesigned Vision Pro 2 to be launched sometime after the Vision Air's debut, and that timeframe eventually slipped to 2028. This second-generation flagship would have featured a lighter, more comfortable design, more advanced displays, longer battery life, and a lower price point. The Air and Pro models together would establish a two-tier product structure, mirroring the iPhone, iPad, MacBook, and AirPods product lines.

The Roadmap Changes

By mid-2024, momentum around the Vision Pro seemed to be shifting, with plans for future products being reorganized.
Midnight-Vision-Pro-Mock-Feature.jpg

An essential report from The Information claimed that Apple had suspended development of the Vision Pro 2, redirecting its engineering resources to the cheaper Vision Air in hopes of accelerating its release. The company ostensibly recognized that the Pro's combination of high cost, bulk, discomfort, and limited use cases had narrowed its appeal even among early adopters.

At the time Apple began work on the device, it sought to release it at the end of 2024, but it still did not have a firm prototype by the middle of the year. The company was said to have struggled to find ways to reduce the model's costs without sacrificing too many features, with the target release date slipping to the end of 2025.

Meanwhile, by October, supply-chain leaks suggested Apple was winding down production of the original Vision Pro, citing weak demand and excess component stockpiles. The first-generation Vision Pro is believed to have ceased production at the end of the year.

Pausing Headset Development Entirely

This month, a bombshell report from Bloomberg said that Apple has also paused work on the lower-cost headset, the "Vision Air." Apple apparently wants to speed up development on a glasses product to better compete with Meta.

vision-pro-video-recording.jpg


If reports from Bloomberg and The Information are true, development of both the Vision Air and the redesigned Vision Pro are paused, with no headset-class hardware in active development. While the company is unlikely to abandon spatial computing altogether, its next steps will almost certainly look very different from the headset it launched in 2024.

The M5 Vision Pro

Apple is about to debut its M5 family of chips, but today's Vision Pro still uses an M2 chip from 2022.
apple-vision-pro-chips.jpg

Apple is believed to have taken the decision to simply refresh the existing hardware with the M5 chip, potentially a second-generation coprocessor "R2" chip, and a new "Dual Knit" headband. This would enable it to keep the existing device up to date for a few more years, while making use of the stockpile of components left over from the first-generation model. This device is expected to launch in the next few weeks, even being leaked by FCC filings.

What Next?

The M5 Vision Pro should offer a reasonable update for users who like the device or potential customers who haven't yet tried it, but it is still unlikely to enjoy mass appeal or a radically different experience. The device is likely to support the headset product line for a period of time, but it will eventually become an outdated model if Apple offers no successors.

Apple-Vision-Pro-Demo.jpeg

Apple is expected to launch its first smart glasses product as soon as next year, and it is possible that the company could resume work on the Vision Air and Vision Pro 2 once the glasses initiative is established. Nevertheless, Apple's headset is likely to enter a peculiar place around 2027 to 2028, with old hardware on sale and no sign of a refresh or replacement model.

For now, visionOS 26 and the upcoming M5 refresh show that Apple is still committed to mixed reality headsets, but where the product line goes further in the future amid a sudden pivot to smart glasses and artificial intelligence is anyone's guess.

Article Link: Vision Pro Future Uncertain as All Headset Development Is Seemingly Paused
 
Hard to believe Apple would develop such a high profile product and drop it completely due to slight competitive pressure. Glasses are immensely useful, in particular, for people that want to record video of their personal action, like kitchen workers or other workers, but it seems Vision Pro would be more useful to more people as a media consumption device.
 
Just before the arrival of the usual uninformed flock of comments about how "nobody wants a VR headset", remember that Meta sold more Quest 3 headsets last year at Christmas than Xbox's AND Playstations combined.

While VR headsets sales will never get to iPhone-like levels of popularity for now , who wouldn't want to achieve Xbox/Playstation level of sales ? The only thing that is killing the Vision is the insanely crazy price , and the weight.

I have a Quest 3, vastly inferior tech, but almost 8 times cheaper, and quite a bit lighter than the VP.

It's also made by MetaFacebook, one of the most horrible companies on the planet, and the Quest basically exists to harvest even more intimate and private personal data to sell it to the highest bidder. Just this fact makes me want Apple to persist in releasing the Vision Air faster so that I can get rid of the Quest.

The VR market shouldn't be a monopoly left to a surveillance company.
 
Glasses are the real product, headsets are a stepping stone.

Makes sense to shift all their work into glasses if they think the technology is there to make them work - they will replace headsets eventually anyway. Maybe they're closer than we think.

Doesn't seem like any cause for alarm.
 
As much as it makes me sad, I can fully see Apple's reasoning here.....
Meta is without doubt doing pretty well (better than even they expected) with their line of Smart Glasses.
First with no display, now with one display, and next with two displays.

And, importantly for others, they are moving at quite a pace with enhancements and models.

Most people seem to believe that Smart Glasses are the long term future, long term possibly even replacing smartphones for most people.

For Apple to see Meta gaining traction, building an ecosystem, and "normal people" being prepared to buy them, and wear them out in public (getting established as an accepted wearable) is not a thing Apple really would want to have nothing to offer.

Many here I know don't like Meta, but normal people are not involved or interested in "Tech Politics and Fan boy/girl ism" and will just see, try and buy a product.
Their friends may see them, try them, and buy their own. Even someone with an iPhone may be tempted "Shock/Horror"

There will be Stratospherically more people who would buy Smart Glasses than a chunky VR headset you 99% just use in private at home.

So, again, whilst I find it say, as I enjoy they full VR experience, and would like to hear Apple have enough tech engineers to keep both projects running at full speed.
It makes total sense for Apple to pull anyone they can to help bring forward the development of Apple branded smart eyewear

"iGlasses" :)

They know Vision Pro / Vision Air is always ALWAYS going to be a niche market. A very dedicated market perhaps, but it's not a mass market.

Smart Glasses are of course the VERY long term, and perhaps with new technical developments Smart Glasses may eventually even be able to replace the experience of a VR headset
(but that's not going to happen for a long long long time as we don't have the tech to create fully immersive experiences in any way with something of a Smart Glass for factor)

So for now, Get Apple Glasses out into the market and at least get yourself into the race, once that's up and running, and you can spend the next 10+ years gradually improving them (like the Apple watch) THEN once the pressure if off and your 1st smart glasses are out, and it's then "revision each year" time.
You can (hopefully) put some of the team back towards the more niche Vision Air line.
 
Glasses are the real product, headsets are a stepping stone.
i think these are 2 differents markets. The main factor of headsets is the complete immersion into another reality, and a vastly bigger field of vision . Glasses to Headsets are more like an AppleWatch compared to an iPad . More focused, smaller snippets of virtual reality.
 
Just before the arrival of the usual uninformed flock of comments about how "nobody wants a VR headset", remember that Meta sold more Quest 3 headsets last year at Christmas than Xbox's AND Playstations combined.

While VR headsets sales will never get to iPhone-like levels of popularity for now , who wouldn't want to achieve Xbox/Playstation level of sales ? The only thing that is killing the Vision is the insanely crazy price , and the weight.

I have a Quest 3, vastly inferior tech, but almost 8 times cheaper, and quite a bit lighter than the VP.

It's also made by MetaFacebook, one of the most horrible companies on the planet, and the Quest basically exists to harvest even more intimate and private personal data to sell it to the highest bidder. Just this fact makes me want Apple to persist in releasing the Vision Air faster so that I can get rid of the Quest.

The VR market shouldn't be a monopoly left to a surveillance company.

I’m not calling you a liar but where’s the source for ps and Xbox comment?
That seems fairly unbelievable or some weird comparison to me.

I do believe this tech has a future but apple should have gone for a mass market version and then a pro later. There needs to be a reason for devs to invest and that requires a large user base.
 
I'm quite surprised that a cheaper successor product wasn't much further along in development. What did Apple expect from the first generation at that price? It was obviously a development kit that happened to be available for purchase on the open market.
 
Glasses are the real product, headsets are a stepping stone.

Makes sense to shift all their work into glasses if they think the technology is there to make them work - they will replace headsets eventually anyway. Maybe they're closer than we think.

Doesn't seem like any cause for alarm.
They should’ve skipped this cumbersome stepping stone.
 
I think I can hold my breath and count to how many of these they’ve actually sold (retail)…might get a little blue, but I’ll survive.
 
Hard to believe Apple would develop such a high profile product and drop it completely due to slight competitive pressure. Glasses are immensely useful, in particular, for people that want to record video of their personal action, like kitchen workers or other workers, but it seems Vision Pro would be more useful to more people as a media consumption device.
Apple Intelligence?
 
Just before the arrival of the usual uninformed flock of comments about how "nobody wants a VR headset", remember that Meta sold more Quest 3 headsets last year at Christmas than Xbox's AND Playstations combined.

While VR headsets sales will never get to iPhone-like levels of popularity for now , who wouldn't want to achieve Xbox/Playstation level of sales ? The only thing that is killing the Vision is the insanely crazy price , and the weight.

I have a Quest 3, vastly inferior tech, but almost 8 times cheaper, and quite a bit lighter than the VP.

It's also made by MetaFacebook, one of the most horrible companies on the planet, and the Quest basically exists to harvest even more intimate and private personal data to sell it to the highest bidder. Just this fact makes me want Apple to persist in releasing the Vision Air faster so that I can get rid of the Quest.

The VR market shouldn't be a monopoly left to a surveillance company.
Apple does not do gaming. Period. And Apple never changes direction, ever. Until they fail spectacularly at something (hello butterfly shitboard)
 
Apple does not do gaming. Period. And Apple never changes direction, ever. Until they fail spectacularly at something (hello butterfly shitboard)
Well, they do facilitate gaming by getting one or two developrrs to port games that already exist on their hardware that already exists. But they’re doing nothing to develop new games or new hardware specifically for gaming.

So Apple “do” do gaming, in that if you already have a Mac for other purposes, you can game on it, if you want to play a handful of games that were originally developed for other platforms.

So, if you play one big game a year, you can. If you want a bit of nostalgia and play resident evil 2, you can. Tomb Raider. It’s nice you can do this, if you Ned to scratch a gaming itch a handful of times a year.

But it’s not a gaming machine. If you priority is gaming, buying a Mac, or even anions device, is a bad decision.

When Apple talks about gaming and gamers, they don’t mean “gamer” on terms of what, say, LTT mean by “gamer”. Apple’s gamers are casual games on iPhones. The marketing term “game” and “gamer” is deliberately fuzzy.

If you have a Mac and are serious about gaming, buy a console and use your Mac for all the non-gaming computing you do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uacd
for people that want to record video of their personal action, like kitchen workers or other workers
GoPro and DJI have much better offerings for less than 500$…

UPD: Meta RayBan too. And I have actually seen many bloggers using them for live PoV footage
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arran
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.