Wow, its awesome that vizio is updating 2016 TVs. All the other manufactures are using this to get people to upgrade their TVs.
To those who are "outraged" that their tv is not getting this update...why don't you already have an Apple TV?
I mean, if AirPlay is THAT important. Just sayin'.![]()
Curious...what's the advantage of having Airplay 2 functionality on a TV if you already have an Apple TV connected?
But, Apple TV will turn off any modern tv and receiver when it is turned off. I guess that I just can't imagine a scenario where HomeKit would improve that.Apple TV doesn't support HomeKit integration, specifically turning on and off the TV. Apple is behind, Google has been able to do this via Chromecast.
Besides, the Apple TV implementation is modern Apple quality... crap. Just tried it, and Siri spun for 15 seconds and says "I'm having trouble with the connection". Rebooted the Apple TV with no change.
How is the "next couple months" a reasonable timeline for getting this?
But, Apple TV will turn off any modern tv and receiver when it is turned off. I guess that I just can't imagine a scenario where HomeKit would improve that.
Maybe it's because I don't have cable, and the ATV is the only source that I ever have my av receiver set to. When I turn the ATV on, tv and receiver come on. Same when I turn it off.
But, Apple TV will turn off any modern tv and receiver when it is turned off. I guess that I just can't imagine a scenario where HomeKit would improve that.
Shame Samsung won't update their older TVs. I have a 2016 KS8000 which is more than capable of running Airplay but they simply aren't updating anything pre-2019 which is lame.
Mine always works. HDMI-CEC, that is.The idea is you say "goodnight" to Siri or you leave the house, then your TV automatically stops playing and turns off. It may be a beta feature, but I think you can set triggers based on playing, so when you start a movie, the lights dim.
Also HDMI-CEC is really buggy. One of my TV/receiver combos never works right, it switches to the Apple TV for a few seconds then something else takes priority and the source switches there instead.
What turns off your game system?It will not turn off the TV if it is not the selected source (e.g. a game system) and you put it to sleep. Having HomeKit integration would mean a “good night” scene could turn off the TV no what the last selected source was.
I can think of one thing. If you want to thow something from your iPhone up to your TV real quick, without having to switch to the Apple TV first, a TV built with Airplay 2 would solve that. When I had an Android for a while, I could do that to my Sony 2018 model with Android built in. But on iPhone, I have to switch first to Apple TV, then airplay to it. A minor, but annoying step.
Anyone on your wifi can sling video or audio easily to the TV. It's a convenience play.
The big question I can’t find the answer to ...
If you have airplay 2 speakers (Ex HomePods) can the TV natively output to these speakers from any input ?
I can output my Apple TV to my stereo HomePods but can’t from any other input source. It would be awesome (but actually this should be how it works) if the tv could take any source including cable/satellite and output to the HomePods
Anyone know if this works ?
I hear a lot of people complaining about LG displays not getting this new tech, but I have been conditioned to just expect this sort of thing (HomeKit promises from so may companies broken).
One thing I'm surprised no one is talking about here is the timeline for this Vizio update rollout. My ecosystem is 100% apple where ever it can be. They make promises, and they deliver, and they do so in a very timely fashion. I have the latest M series Vizio and checking for updates showed nothing. How is the "next couple months" a reasonable timeline for getting this? I mean they have had a pretty prolonged beta (that I could not sign up for because it was closed by the time I bought my TV).
For anyone to answer..
Are there any advantages if you had one of these Airplay 2 & homekit enabled TV's as well as a AppleTV 4k connected to said TV? Does the combination of both enable additional use cases or functionality or some sorts? Just wondering. Thanks
They still need to be a lot cheaper for people to upgrade faster with them. Most people I know buy a tv maybe once every 10 years.
Wow, its awesome that vizio is updating 2016 TVs. All the other manufactures are using this to get people to upgrade their TVs.
Anyone on your wifi can sling video or audio easily to the TV. It's a convenience play.
[doublepost=1564585647][/doublepost]
I think the outrage is that a budget brand like Vizio is doing this for older TVs, while "premium" brands like LG and Samsung are bailing after a single year (LG) or not even offering the actual solution completely (Samsung). Given the audience here, where you expect superior support in exchange for that extra money, people are naturally wondering what that extra money was for.
I can think of one thing. If you want to thow something from your iPhone up to your TV real quick, without having to switch to the Apple TV first, a TV built with Airplay 2 would solve that. When I had an Android for a while, I could do that to my Sony 2018 model with Android built in. But on iPhone, I have to switch first to Apple TV, then airplay to it. A minor, but annoying step.
iPhone get updates for at least 4 years tho.Yup, it’s like the TV makers want TVs to be the new phones and get people to upgrade every year. It’s disgusting given all the waste produced.
AirPlay on a 2016 Vizio, but, not a 2018 LG!?
What year is it?
I think Samsung had microphones that were listening from memory.I might be mistaken, but didn’t Samsung do something similar?
I think you are right (it seems like I heard something about that 1-2 years ago) but I don't know the details of that incident. The other company that I will not buy from again is Bose. They make great speakers but I lost all trust in the company when they did virtually the same thing as LG. They logged everything customers were listening to on their headsets and sold that information to 3rd parties. I have been looking for more information on the federal, class action suit that was filed agains them but I have not seen anything in quite a while.I might be mistaken, but didn’t Samsung do something similar?
In the case of cellular companies, yes, I do use one of those because I can't find a national carrier that hasn't been involved in selling location data. Likewise, I only have 2 options for home Internet service (both are listed above) so I do use one of them (with a VPN). However, not every TV manufacturer has been caught spying on customers. Where I have choice to buy from companies that have been caught spying on customers vs those that have not, I will always buy from the ones that have not.Hope you don't use Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, or Sprint for mobile phone service because they were selling user location data
https://techcrunch.com/2019/01/09/us-cell-carriers-still-selling-your-location-data/
or Comcast, Google Fiber, Verizon, or AT&T for an ISP because they might be selling your data too.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...sell-your-browsing-history-and-location-data/