Well if someone prefers macOS to Windows but needs to run many applications that are only available for Windows they either have to find a way to run that software on their Mac or buy two machines.What is the fascination with running Windows on an Apple device. Seriously choose your platform. The very last thing I want on my Mac is Windows.
What is the fascination with running Windows on an Apple device. Seriously choose your platform. The very last thing I want on my Mac is Windows.
Windows 11 isn’t beta.Oh boy, alpha software on a beta OS.
Remember, the Linux community is kinda like a weird alternative music community.Ubuntu is user-friendly on desktop and server purely because it's what tons of people use, so you can always find online help and get first-class support by software devs, vs say Arch where even Docker doesn't make official packages for you. Whatever technical decisions some people are objecting to, maybe they matter at some level, but they're nearly invisible to most users and dwarfed by the difference in support level.
Probably does t work with software that needs device drivers?Have you tried Crossover Mac. It even runs x86 games.
Windows 11 for ARM is beta softwareWindows 11 isn’t beta.
Windows 11 arm64 is betaWindows 11 isn’t beta.
Gotta do my taxes somehow. Occasionally I also want to play a game, and my Windows PC got fried recently, so...What is the fascination with running Windows on an Apple device. Seriously choose your platform. The very last thing I want on my Mac is Windows.
The Wine x86 support on M1 is such a pleasant surprise. But regardless of M1 or Intel, Wine usually won't run a game properly, if at all. I think Steam Proton stole all of Wine's popularity, and it's Linux-only.Have you tried Crossover Mac. It even runs x86 games.
I’m using UTM at the moment but find it quite limiting. On my macOS guest no FaceTime camera support, can’t login into the App Store and iCloud, no drag-‘n’-drop between guest and host, interface issues, etc. Support on these issues is scarce.VMware is trash. UTM all the way.
To be fair to Microsoft, I shouldn’t single them out: EVERY piece of software is beta-quality at this point. Unfinished. Loaded with bugs. Apple’s not remotely exempt here.Windows 11 isn’t beta.
The Wine x86 support on M1 is such a pleasant surprise. But regardless of M1 or Intel, Wine usually won't run a game properly, if at all. I think Steam Proton stole all of Wine's popularity, and it's Linux-only.
I'm not saying that no, someone else replied to me and said some x86 stuff is emulated inside of W11 ARM.are you saying I can run the ARM windows on Mac then run modern games in emulation?!
how well does that work?
Well that is interesting and helpful I didn't know it could do that! Thanks for the tip!Yes actually, it should run just fine. The tool itself can only create x86_64 images though, FWIW, so you cant create an ARM64 ISO, but you should be able to create ones for x86 just fine
Bring that up with Linus Media Group. I'm just copy and pasting their chart.Fedora isn't based on Red Hat. Red Hat is based on Fedora.
Fedora is the bleeding-edge testing distro that they use as a base for RHEL. CentOS is now their rolling-release pre-RHEL distro.
If you want a distro that's based on Red Hat, you need Rocky Linux.
Have you even tried Arch? SteamOS uses Arch and it has a lot of major packages.For M1 maybe, but I'm not messing with any non-Ubuntu Linux on x86 anymore. I don't care what advantages there are to Arch, it's not worth having to use niche community-supported packages for all the mainstream software like Docker.
I wondered whether it was based on WINE or not. In other words, Valve is doing the same thing as CodeWeavers did (ie perform commercial development on WINE and backport the improvements to stock WINE).It hasn't stolen Wine's popularity.
Valve has actively been injecting money into Wine and contributing to it. And it shows: since they started with the project, game compatibility has been growing exponentially, with many games running "out of the box".
Just compare this to the compatibility of corporate apps, which hasn't seen an investment as big. By comparison, it has been stale for years.
You can still download a Wine fork that runs games (Wine-proton; Wine-GE), but your experience will not be as smooth.
I wondered whether it was based on WINE or not. In other words, Valve is doing the same thing as CodeWeavers did (ie perform commercial development on WINE and backport the improvements to stock WINE).
Same here: I was a Fusion user while I had Intel Macs, switched to M1 and Parallels because of their Windows support and now I’ll be more than happy to jump back to VMware this year. I am already running the new Tech Preview and it works just fine for what I need. I won't be renewing my Parallels subscription which is due in October.So I have been trying it out and installing the VMWare Tools are not working, yes the ARM64 drivers for ethernet and display are working but not the rest. But as booth Fusion and VMWare Tools 12.1.0 are in beta / preview I'm guessing it's ok
When it's all done I'll go over to Fusion from parallels as I don't like to pay the yearly fee to Parallelse.
And no, the one time pay version has it's limits so I can't use that.