Yes ... 2 years that i'm waiting for a major update of the 15" retina to buy it. But Apple won't skip skylake they just wait for GT4e HQ processors . Hope it will come between January and Aprilso wait, the current 15" macbook pro are haswell?? if you all say that Apple skiped broadwel and skylake
Kaby Lake is a topic that has been rehashed ad nauseum in virtually every single page for the last few pages of this thread, but to reiterate:
Yes, Kaby Lake is slated for Q3 2016, but Kaby Lake GT3 and GT4e iGPUs are not slated until 2017. The 13" MBP gets GT3 (so SesameWasher is incorrect about it being possible in June 2016), and the the 15" gets GT4e, so neither one can get Kaby Lake before 2016.
Can we dream and think Apple don't care about the Iris pro 580 and will put in the cheaper 15" retina a quad i7 without an iGPU and a low end dGPU like a gt950 ?About Kaby Lake, yes it will be out summer of 2016. However, Broadwell and Skylake release paths show that the Macbook Pro related chips are not out for several months afterwards. The 15" always gets the highest end HQ chip with the Iris Pro graphics, while the 13" has for the last 2 generations gotten the highest end U chip with the highest Iris graphics tier.
The MBA and rMB may get lower end chips, but they are off topic here. The trends clearly show that the Kaby Lake release date says nothing about the availability of Kaby Lake chips for rMBPs - either 13" or 15" . So I would not hold my breath for them.
Further, Kaby Lake is also 14nm, and is not a die shrink (tick), so it will not have additional chip real estate for greater graphics capability over Skylake unless they compromise elsewhere for additional die real estate. Kaby Lake is a break from Intel's tick-tock cycle, and constitutes a second tock after Skylake. Cannonlake is the die shrink tick to 10nm, and is not until until 2017 (probably 2018 for MBP specific parts).
AirdanMR posted a graphic about Skylake production schedule suggesting that Skylake-U 28W parts with Iris 540 are due for manufacture in December. That would be the earliest Intel can make available parts for the 13" MBP. There's still no information on Skylake-H 45W parts with Iris Pro 580. Those are the ones that will go into 15" .
If as powerfull , Intel Iris Pro 580 is way better . The power consumption of the 580 is less than half of a dedicated GPUWhat if HD580 is as fast as GTX 950M?
Between 2010 and 2015, Apple has not used anything but the highest end chip in the 15" MBP. They've never gone down to cheaper tiers.Can we dream and think Apple don't care about the Iris pro 580 and will put in the cheaper 15" retina a quad i7 without an iGPU and a low end dGPU like a gt950 ?
definitely smaller bezels like Dell xps 13/15 and some good gpu graphics gtx 900m (highest class right now).I think that Apple won't skip Skylake ! They already skip broadwell for the 15" . I hope they will also refresh the design with smaller bezels, a bit thinner and Usb-C ports instead of Usb A.
My point wasn't so much IF Apple will use the new Skylake processors, but WHEN. There is an underlying assumption that if the new processors are available in December 2015 that Apple will put them in the new MBP in January 2016. That is what I was challenging. Apple may have different timing in mind...True, but since this is Waiting for Skylake CPU, we suppose they're going to use the equivalent 28W TDP of the actual generation but with Skylake. What other alternatives do you think they could use? Skylake-H Quad Cores on the 13 inch would be just an amazing thing to see.
Since I'm not rich, I expect my buy to last at least 5-6 years. USB-C (TB3) will allow to use 4k monitors, eGPU and it's the future, like it or not. On the other hand nobody said that a rMBP with USB-C / TB3 can't have standard USB 3.1 too.
So basically, for me yes.
All I said was that Apple might move towards A-based chips in the future but now, in 2015, no way. 2020 maybe.Switching from an architecture to another it's not an easy job, and why to switch anyway, just because GeekBench shows A9X did it "better"? What about the massive x86 based apps, and the compatibility of Windows?
They will certainly try it at some point, maybe even quite soon. But certainly not in the MBP. Other than the switch to Intel, this is more about power savings than gains in performance. So the MB is the obvious candidate for an ARM based chip. At least thats the way I see it.All I said was that Apple might move towards A-based chips in the future but now, in 2015, no way. 2020 maybe.
Do all of you remember how before the rMB introduction there was a rumour of a 12" Macbook Air being introduced at the Spring Forward event but it actually turned out to be a new line (rMP).
http://appleinsider.com/articles/15...th-retina-display-to-launch-in-q2-report-says
Interestingly there is going to be a "15" inch Macbook Air" according to this rumor:
https://www.macrumors.com/2015/11/30/thinner-macbook-air-13-15-wwdc-2016/
Could it be that once again this new super thin "Air" is being confused (like it happened with the rMP) and it's actually the new rMBP.
Do all of you remember how before the rMB introduction there was a rumour of a 12" Macbook Air being introduced at the Spring Forward event but it actually turned out to be a new line (rMP).
http://appleinsider.com/articles/15...th-retina-display-to-launch-in-q2-report-says
Interestingly there is going to be a "15" inch Macbook Air" according to this rumor:
https://www.macrumors.com/2015/11/30/thinner-macbook-air-13-15-wwdc-2016/
Could it be that once again this new super thin "Air" is being confused (like it happened with the rMP) and it's actually the new rMBP. I can already see the tear fest and "apple is doomed" comments pouring in about how Apple is sacrificing everything that makes a "PRO Laptop" (highly subjective term) for the sake of making everything thin. Hope this rumor is fake though. I'm not really a fan of tapered designs, not a deal breaker but not my preferred style.
As you I think this new chasis isn't going to have the "Air" brand. It had sense years ago but not today.
They will be just "Macbook" same as the 12 inch and with same design and options but bigger and different CPU performance.
12-inch Core M
13-inch Skylake-U
15-inch Skylake-H
Just the same options Dell offers with their XPS family.
Does it means the end of PRO family? I don't know but I liked the idea of 14-inch and 16-inch rMBP =(
Maybe we can save the air, but merge air and pro together. Like 12in MacBook 14in Air and 16in ProAs you I think this new chasis isn't going to have the "Air" brand. It had sense years ago but not today.
They will be just "Macbook" same as the 12 inch and with same design and options but bigger and different CPU performance.
12-inch Core M
13-inch Skylake-U
15-inch Skylake-H
Just the same options Dell offers with their XPS family.
Does it means the end of PRO family? I don't know but I liked the idea of 14-inch and 16-inch rMBP =(
Maybe we can save the air, but merge air and pro together. Like 12in MacBook 14in Air and 16in Pro
Like what the iPads right now.