I'm pretty sure you didn't understand my post.
While that is the current Walmart logo - forget that it's losing the star - it doesn't look like the Walmart logo is properly placed. If you look at the at&t logo and the Walmart logo they don't line up at all. Even on an angle they would match up but the Walmart logo is slightly higher than the at&t one.
The possibility seems feasible, this picture does not.
Shows how much I shop at the Big W. When did they change their logo?
However, I think it would be smart of Apple to introduce a lower-priced but still feature rich version of the iPhone to grab more market.
I think I did. You were saying that a lot of people are replacing their shuffle and Nokia with an iPhone. Having 3.74gb is a bump for them.
What I'm saying is that after a month or so, those 3.37gb will be gone and the customer will likely be unhappy with his/her choice.
If this truly pans out to be the case, at&t better offer a cheaper data plan for this. I wouldn't want to shell out 100 bucks for a 4 GB iPhone and have to pay the huge data tariff.
No thanks. I don't support Wal-Mart.
Fact 1: A lot of people have replaced their iPod and Cell phone with an iPhone and were glad to do so.
Fact 2: Apple has sold a ton of iPod Shuffles, many to people for whom the shuffle is still their only iPod.
I'll let you guys figure it out from here...
....If they don't need a certain feature, no one does....
You're serious, right? Who has only 4gb of music? I don't know many college students who fall in that range. Maybe High School students? Plenty of us shop at Walmart too. (As much as we hate it.)
Now add a movie or two and 3.5gb is nowhere near enough storage. I had a hard enough time going from a 32 gb iPod to a 16gb touch. When I bought the iPod, I didn't think I'd ever touch 15gb, let alone 32. I now have over 60 gb of movies...
now there is a phrase you don't see very often(Wal-Mart isn't that cheap)
Fact 1: A lot of people have replaced their iPod and Cell phone with an iPhone and were glad to do so.
Fact 2: Apple has sold a ton of iPod Shuffles, many to people for whom the shuffle is still their only iPod.
I'll let you guys figure it out from here...
Agreed(ish). I'm sick and tired of Apple using RAM as a delineating factor in the massive price differences between models. iPod Touchs (or Touches?) and iPhones are both very different in price just because of a few Gbs of RAM.
I'm sorry, but 8Gb of RAM to take you to from 8 to 16Gb does not cost $100, even with a reasonable mark-up. And if it did, Apple should go ahead, balls out, and charge $399 for a 32Gb. Actually, that's kind of what they do with the iPod Touch: 8/16/32 are $229/$299/$399 respectively.
These things should be priced $99/$139/$199 for the 8/16/32Gb respectively. They would probably sell about 10%/40%/50% (figures plucked out of the air/my a$$) and do very well on it thank you very much.
now there is a phrase you don't see very often![]()
Now add a movie or two and 3.5gb is nowhere near enough storage. I had a hard enough time going from a 32 gb iPod to a 16gb touch. When I bought the iPod, I didn't think I'd ever touch 15gb, let alone 32. I now have over 60 gb of movies...
So why are we thinking 4gb? I didn't see 4gb in those pictures. Of course what I saw had a lota blur.
Wouldn't a $99/8gb, $199/16gb and $299/32gb after MW seem better?