I definitely wasn't saying they were equivalent. I did say a process that takes 5, no let's stretch it, 10 seconds doesn't equate to a hassle... for me, while acknowledging it may be a hassle for you. I guess I view it from the perspective that neither process gets you out of the store any quicker than the other. Caveat being the use of the standard cashier process. Self check out? Possibly so, but we're still talking about seconds. It seems a little perspective is in order when discussing the process. This doesn't apply to your comments but some people in this thread really need to pump the brakes on the trials and tribulations of Walmart Pay. Primarily because most of the complaints I've seem are all supposition, not from an actual experience. Hyperbole alert: The process literally <--urban dictionary meaning of literally- takes less time than it takes for someone to type a comment like this gem:Yes... we're not talking about minutes or hours here.
But there ARE more steps to use Walmart Pay than to use Apple Pay.
You can't possibly think the two processes are equivalent, can you?
Apple Pay is ready to go as soon as your iPhone is placed near the reader. No unlocking the phone or opening an app. Just press your thumb and go.
Walmart Pay, on the other hand, makes you unlock your phone, open an app, press a button in the app, use TouchID for a second time, then point your phone at a QR code.
It's not impossible to do those tasks... but come on.
I Googled the word "hassle" just to see what it would come up with.
It returned "irritating inconvenience"
Nailed it.![]()
No real comment on your quote. Just using it as a time measurement.I can't wait to continue not to patronize Walmart.
So if they abandoned MCX and are finally willing to accept credit card fees... why not just offer Apple Pay?
I don't even let the annoyance bother me anymore. Mobile phone payments will never catch on in the U.S. Americans are too paranoid about everything related to cards. We can't even move to EMV or contactless credit cards without everyone throwing a $%&^ fit over it.
If a merchant has their chip reader active, I'm happy.
If not, I walk out wondering why they don't.
They are NFC capable. They just aren't enabled on either the merchant account level or the POS level.Obviously there is a large cost to upgrading their terminals. But just last year the local Walmart got newterminals, why didn't they buy NFC compatible terminals? They could slowly swap out as the old ones are replaced on their normal schedule.
And yes, it really does take a sec. Double click friend button and tap watch to screen. Done.
Walmart I'm sure would rather you put it on your main screen. Fighting for that prime main home screen real estat.You forgot a step to using Walmart Pay, "find the app. So open the folder and swipe till you get to it. Or swipe home screens till you get to it."
Exactly this. Walmart pay could easily work with Apple Pay because they could just add it into the app. I imagine this is how they'll do "Apple Pay"...I wouldn't even mind it if they did it this way. More places I could use it the better.The main objection is the same as it was for the CurrentC group - Apple Pay and other NFC payment systems provide an anonymizing layer for the consumer, preventing tracking of your purchases and collection of your financial details. That sort of metadata is valuable to them.
I imagine if/when they start allowing Apple Pay, it'll be more along the lines of how Starbucks does it - you use Apple Pay within the store app, meaning they still collect all that valuable information on you.
I definitely wasn't saying they were equivalent. I did say a process that takes 5, no let's stretch it, 10 seconds doesn't equate to a hassle... for me, while acknowledging it may be a hassle for you. I guess I view it from the perspective that neither process gets you out of the store any quicker than the other. Caveat being the use of the standard cashier process. Self check out? Possibly so, but we're still talking about seconds.
Sounds like credit card is still easier. Well, whatever. You'll spend an hour shopping there. Not like 5 seconds vs 15 seconds of paying matters.Walmart Pay is now live in every store in the US. This article is incorrect.
I was skeptical at first, but with Touch ID and 3D Touch integration, it really is seamless to do this. It is literally the most convenient alternative that could be made to ApplePay.
Unlock phone, 3D Touch the Walmart icon, unlock WalmartPay with TouchID, and scan the QR code. I've used it 10+ times and it takes 5 seconds or less to do it.
As for Walmart Pay, I'm sure one of the reasons the company is pushing it is to mine customer data. With Apple Pay, they don't get to track their customers.
Any stats on the number of customers using this payment method and customer satisfaction using it?
Side note: didn't realize how many Walmart stores are scattered around the nation. A case of quantity over quality possibly.
Walmart Pay is now live in every store in the US. This article is incorrect.
I was skeptical at first, but with Touch ID and 3D Touch integration, it really is seamless to do this. It is literally the most convenient alternative that could be made to ApplePay.
Unlock phone, 3D Touch the Walmart icon, unlock WalmartPay with TouchID, and scan the QR code. I've used it 10+ times and it takes 5 seconds or less to do it.
I only use self checkout. What then.That is true to a point, but Walmart doesn't make uniform hardware changes throughout the company. Different stores still do have different card readers. I frequent two locations and both card readers are different. One is significantly older than the other.
Yes, they've switched out a lot of stores card readers, but the vast majority of the readers that were in stores have read the new credit card chips for years.
It is very much so possible that a vast majority have NFC turned off. But the point is that Apple has provided little to no incentive for companies to use ApplePay aside from giving them free stickers on their windows. So companies like Walmart and Chick-Fil-A are making their own way. And that isn't necessarily a bad thing. Sure, the native way is easier, but they are making good logistical decisions because the alternative is a poor.
[doublepost=1467676776][/doublepost]
We're literally counting seconds here. 1-2 seconds vs 3-5. You have to press two buttons vs 1. But you can use scan the QR code and use WalmartPay at any time when the cashier is checking you out(you don't have to wait until they are done.) So really, it's a moot point. You can only pay as fast as your cashier rings up all of your items.
It takes me less than 0.5 secs with Apple Pay.
It's great that it takes 5 sec but Apple Pay literally take a sec or less. No to mention I trust Apple more then Walmart. That may seem silly but I just do.
That being said I wish Walmart could somehow use the NFC chip to make it that fast. Becuase getting the receipts auto entered into the saving catcher would be really nice.
[doublepost=1467671780][/doublepost]
This is how Walmart should do it. Let you use Apple Pay and still auto detect the Walmart receipt and auto upload it. But that would promote Apple Pay and hurt what they want to do.
Tap, tap, tap, tap. That's what we're discussing here. Perspective. Both solutions are easy. One takes 4 taps and the other takes 1 tap, so I guess that one can be considered the winner in the button pushing race. There's nothing hard about either. Walmart probably knows their customers fairly well and probably crafted this to reach the majority in the easiest and most accessible way possible. Every phone doesn't have NFC capability and I'd bet good money a good portion of their customers use NFC-less phones. This solution lets them reach the most customers with minimal overhead.Again... time isn't the hassle I was referring to. It was the steps.
Every retailer is trying to create "friction-free" experiences for their customers, right?
Walmart Pay... and other QR Code based systems... are adding friction by introducing multiple steps. A camera... really? Is this 2009?
I'm not saying "OMG it takes so long to unlock my phone and open an app"
My point is... mobile payment solutions exist where do you don't have to unlock your phone and open an app.
It doesn't matter if both solutions take 5 seconds to complete. The one that accomplishes the same goal with fewer steps is the winner
Isn't this the same discussion from the old MCX/CurrentC threads on this forum? I thought the general consensus was that QR Code solutions are needlessly complicated compared to NFC solutions. (even if we're only talking about a couple seconds of actual time spent in either process)
The time wasn't the issue... it was the steps.
Tap, tap, tap, tap. That's what we're discussing here. Perspective. Both solutions are easy. One takes 4 taps and the other takes 1 tap, so I guess that one can be considered the winner in the button pushing race. There's nothing hard about either. Walmart probably knows their customers fairly well and probably crafted this to reach the majority in the easiest and most accessible way possible. Every phone doesn't have NFC capability and I'd bet good money a good portion of their customers use NFC-less phones. This solution lets them reach the most customers with minimal overhead.
I understand what you're saying. I don't necessarily disagree with it. It just seems your words are artificially forcing hardship to make a point. It really ain't that hard.
With hundreds of millions of iOS devices sold it's foolish to dismiss the platform directly and most easily supported by Apple.
Also no new training or fighting with the cashier as they just see it as a credit card on their end.
If no time is saved either way I would rather not be the customer that sits on my phone the entire time while they are doing their job. Having done retail I know that it's a lot easier on the cashier if you at least engage in polite conversation. Maybe I'm just too friendly though.Uh, okay. Apparently, emoji aren't as effective as a conveyance of jocularity as I thought they would be.
[doublepost=1467684584][/doublepost]
When the cashier finishes ringing in your purchases aren't you at the exact same point whether you use Apple Pay or Walmart Pay? As bigredmachine pointed out up thread, all of the pre-processing can be done while the cashier is ringing up the items. You're getting out of the store at the same time regardless. Even with more steps in Walmart Pay, what time have you actually saved?