Why shop there?
I haven't shopped there in years. I would rather drive 10 more miles and pay more then buy from them
Like others, I think you're mistaking the segment of the population that shops at Wal-Mart for the middle class. You're also ignoring the total cost of ownership for the device.
Have you been in a Wal-Mart? When I am, I see 'astonishing' number of non iPhones (hell, non smartphones) being used.
Yours may be different. Ours are all weight, including those that now have rollers. When they first came out there were some issues as many items were not given the proper weight in the system. (some need a range, like produce paid for per item) But I haven't seen a conveyer belt.RFID tags.
If I scan a bag of OREOs but send a box of Captain Crunch down the conveyor belt it stops and sends it back.
Computers know everything these days.
Based on the comments it sounds like some other stores use scales, but I'm certain mine uses RFID since it does this on a conveyor belt and I don't see how it could weigh stuff while it's moving.
It's also dumb to put money that you earned into corporations that move that money out of your community and out of the country as quickly as possible. Duh. Why put resources back into your community? Because investment is always better than waste.To save money. Duh. Most people, whether rich or poor, like to save money. I know a millionaire that shops at Wal-Mart because it's cheaper to buy certain items there than Costco, Sam's Club, or ordinary grocery stores.
Why save money? Because it's smart.
Why not throw away money? Because it's dumb to waste it.
Not everyone. Some of us are lucky to live places that don't allow those types of businesses. Not coincidentally, small businesses and citizens' sense of responsibility towards their neighbors are thriving.Everyone shops at Wal-Mart, from the dregs of society, to the upper middle class. And why shouldn't they? It's relatively inexpensive, and you're guaranteed to find one within 5 miles of your house. Wal-Mart has succeeded mostly on being convenient.
Employee theft accounts for a greater loss than shoplifting.If they do this in the ghetto cesspool where I live, their inventory will shrink right along with their profits as their shoplifting skyrockets. I can just hear the ghettoliscious excuses now.
Fail. The point of a self-checkout is to get through faster and avoid the lines. If you have cases of soda or water, you cannot fit the damn things on the scale, and if you can, you have to remove the previous bags. And due to this, you need to get approval for all of the scenarios.
It's also dumb to put money that you earned into corporations that move that money out of your community and out of the country as quickly as possible. Duh. Why put resources back into your community? Because investment is always better than waste.
Designed for people with a few items. Not a cart full of groceries and toys.
No... the quantity isn't the issue, it's the size of the items. They should only need to approve it one time when you hit do not bag item, not for every additional time. They have cameras all over the damn place anyways.
I never had a problem with a case of water and a case of cola at the self check out. I've never seem a person have this problem either. This is not to say it does not happen occasionally.
What I do see all the time are people making large order in the self checkout taking an hour. The posters claim was for the above scenarios not for which you said fail. If you are to stupid or have to many items, don't use self checkout.
It wouldn't take an hour if the software was better.
It's also dumb to put money that you earned into corporations that move that money out of your community and out of the country as quickly as possible. Duh. Why put resources back into your community? Because investment is always better than waste.
RFID tags.
If I scan a bag of OREOs but send a box of Captain Crunch down the conveyor belt it stops and sends it back.
Computers know everything these days.
Based on the comments it sounds like some other stores use scales, but I'm certain mine uses RFID since it does this on a conveyor belt and I don't see how it could weigh stuff while it's moving.
I thought you said it was the hardware that was the problem. Now it's the software?
With 25 items or less it is a viable option, if you have 150 items and 150 coupons it does not take rocket science to figure out there may be a problem.
At Sam's Club (Walmart's sister store), when you leave, hand your receipt to a clerk who matches your receipt with the items in your cart. This actually adds in an extra step where you'll be a special exit to pay and most likely have your items matched.
How many of those people can afford iPhones in the first place though?
I have no doubts that if such a system is put into place that theft/ shoplifting/ 'I-thought-I-paid-for-it's' will increase exponentially and cause problems. But given Wal-Marts clientele, I think a majority will be 'iPhoned' out from the get go.
Put it back into my community? So by not shopping at Albertsons for my paper towels I'm robbing my community? Please. This is the real world. I have two children and a limited income. I'm not going to over-spend to "help my community", and be left without enough money to buy diapers at the end of the month. Yeah, it's a vicious cycle. I didn't create it, I'm just playing the cards I was dealt. I don't have the luxury to "think about the greater good". I need to provide as best I can for my three dependants and create a savings so my children can go to college. The plan you propose would leave my kids without food, diapers, and college fund.