inkswamp said:Did you forget the conest where cups at 7-11 had iTunes free codes on them?
HE HE. I forgot! Fore real though I don't see how selling Shuffles at Walmart would hurt Apple. They sell them at Target! Now Kmart would another story!
inkswamp said:Did you forget the conest where cups at 7-11 had iTunes free codes on them?
xsnightclub said:Thats odd, Green Bay has 2 Wal-Marts,1 sams club, 2 targets, 2 Kmarts, 2 Home Depots, 3 Shopkos, 2 kohls, 1 best buy, 1 circuit city, 2 menards, and numerous other big box grocery stores. Your example has no logic that any store is destroying your local economy.
But if it puts the availability for people to buy an iPod shuffle that have walmarts nearby that don't have Apple stores or best buys, all the better for Apple and us Apple users.
Santaduck said:I wonder if Walmart would be allowed even a modest discount on their pricing. That would be very typical of Walmart, but singularly unbelievable for Apple.
narco said:Yeah, but Best Buy? Target? Only one of each in my city, but we somehow have 4 Walmarts, not including 2 Sam's Club stores. They may have the same business practices, but I don't see Best Buy destroying the local economy.
Fishes,
narco.
R3z said:Did I miss something? Is Apple having a problem moving these things that would require a deal like this?
I certainly hope this is Just a rumor. Apple is strong, and they've had great luck with fighting pricing pressure before, but we're talking Wal-Mart here, there's not been a retailer with this kind of power before. This isn't even taking into account the negative image associated with Wal-Mart - if you're going to push product at the prices and using the method that Apple does, aligning yourself with the company best known for using bangladeshi toddlers to sew cheap shirts probably isn't the best route. An air of exclusivity and image has helped Apple a great deal so far, and I don't see much reason to give that up now. I don't see this doing a whole lot of good for Apple.
SiliconAddict said:Again I point to Walmart being the most sued company in recent American history. The likelihood of being sued more is based on money and suit merit. There are obviously baloney claims against many big companies but the fact remains that Walmart last year got sued more then the US government. That and they have stopped settling in count and gone ahead with some of these lawsuits. This has caused the number of sketchy suites to drop yet they still are number one in lawsuits in the US.
HiRez said:Ugh, first HP, then Pepsi and McDonald's, now Wal-Mart? I hate to apply the phrase "selling out" to Apple but...yeesh. Then again, I suppose it will help them "sell out" in more ways than one. Oh well, the times, they are a changin'. I usually don't care much about who Apple does business with but Wal-Mart are truly scumbags who have a wide-ranging and adverse effect on our society IMHO (and at odds with everything Apple has stood for in the past). Bow before the almighty dollar.
i_am_a_cow said:Walmart put Rubbermaid out of business!!! They are *******s and will try to drive Apple to cheap labor.![]()
jsalzer said:Shell
I have to agree. While many of us may not like Wal-Mart, I can't blame Apple for seeing the need to sell there, as not doing so while the competition does, will hurt them.AlanAudio said:Well it's quite clear that WalMart isn't the most beloved retailer in the US and many people here would rather eat worms than buy stuff from them, but the fact remains that they are not merely a big retailer, they are immense.
If Apple don't let WalMart sell Shuffles, you can be entirely sure that WalMart will sell millions of other players and every one of those will be unsuitable for direct operation with iTMS.
It doesn't matter what they think, it does however matter what the customer thinks. Wal-Mart's own slogan is "The customer is always right." It's a good thing when fellow customers share all the information they have on Wal-Mart or any other business, so that they can all decide whether it is a place that they would like to do business at. Sharing information with the goal of helping others learn not only the good, but the bad side of a company, is a good thing. You don't have to read about it if you don't want to.Wonder Boy said:walmart is going to exist whether shuffles are sold there or not. so enough of the "walmart is evil" talk. they don't care what you think.
Sun Baked said:Now Apple is hiding behind a really big evil corporation, now they are suddenly angels.![]()
jelloshotsrule said:shell?? hmm... well to each their own..
i_am_a_cow said:Walmart put Rubbermaid out of business!!! They are *******s and will try to drive Apple to cheap labor.![]()
AlanAudio said:Well it's quite clear that WalMart isn't the most beloved retailer in the US and many people here would rather eat worms than buy stuff from them, but the fact remains that they are not merely a big retailer, they are immense.
If Apple don't let WalMart sell Shuffles, you can be entirely sure that WalMart will sell millions of other players and every one of those will be unsuitable for direct operation with iTMS.
It's considerably better for Apple and all Mac users if Walmart were to sell iPods rather than WMA players.
Maybe it's a sign that although iTMS is reportedly only marginally profitable at the moment, in the longer term Apple sees iTMS as a serious money-maker. In order for iTMS to become universally used, retailers like WalMart will need to sell players that work with iTMS.
Every time they sell a WMA player, it's a lost iTMS customer. Every time they sell an iPod, it's a potential iTMS customer but also a potential upgrader and switcher.
Apple needs to sell iPods everywhere if they're to be used by everyone.
i_am_a_cow said:Walmart put Rubbermaid out of business!!! They are *******s and will try to drive Apple to cheap labor.![]()