jaredlipsitz
macrumors regular
You knew him well then?This. This is the moment I've been waiting for. This is the first time that I can unequivocally say it:
Steve Jobs would never let this happen.
You knew him well then?This. This is the moment I've been waiting for. This is the first time that I can unequivocally say it:
Steve Jobs would never let this happen.
Exactly.... and the saddest part, IMO, is Cook being happy about/proud of the fact Buffet "doesn't invest in tech companies". Yes, the fact he keeps Apple means he views them as just another consumer goods company. How FAR that is from Job's original vision for Apple!
As a tech guy myself, this "insight" is something that's pretty jarring to me. It makes me double-down on my efforts to move back out of the Apple ecosystem as I make future home computer/tech purchases. Because frankly, if a company isn't even focused on the tech it makes enough to be considered a "tech business" anymore? That means as a power user of tech, I'm better served by the ones who do.
This thread is overfilled with youngsters who doesn’t understand the economy. How do you think Apple keep their employees when Silicon Valley is filled with awesome companies? To a large extent, stock bonuses and an increasing stock price.
This move is better for us consumers. Stop being so anti-economy.
And the game was developed by a 3rd party. It’s not like Apple had to tell their best coders to suddenly make a game.
That's a ridiculous comment. Apple making a simple game takes nothing away from their resources that are oriented toward consumers. Also, the task of building a game to honor their 3rd largest stakeholder, who owns $50 billion worth of their stock, is a trivial thing. I suppose you think it's foolish if they celebrate birthdays with cake in the office, too?Wow! So, Apple makes a game just to kiss a huge supporting investor's ass?!? Do we need anymore proof of who Apple is oriented towards? It's not the consumer.
Tim didn't say it was an original idea.And, Tim, it's not an original idea. It's called "Paperboy" and Atari did it better in 1985!
Apple CEO Tim Cook made a surprise appearance at Berkshire Hathaway's annual meeting in Omaha, Nebraska over the weekend, where he said he is "thrilled" that billionaire Warren Buffett is an investor in the iPhone maker.
There is a stark difference between selling a music player that has a brand deal with what was at the time one of the biggest bands internationally, and making a stupid game for a billionaire investor. A prime example between Tim and Steve is that Steve had his team design a cool looking iPod option to sell to users. Tim forced everyone to download their latest album, whether they wanted to or not.![]()
[doublepost=1557201577][/doublepost]
Apple hasn't been a "tech company" since "a bicycle for the mind".
Not well but we have exchanged emails.You knew him well then?
I'd argue that they were both vanity projects and there's no difference at all.There is a stark difference between selling a music player that has a brand deal with what was at the time one of the biggest bands internationally, and making a stupid game for a billionaire investor.