what part of "turn off icloud" do you not understand?
you have 2-3 months to perform 5 taps on your screen.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Watchdog Investigation Finds 'Major Weaknesses' in Apple's App Store Child Safety Measures
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
what part of "turn off icloud" do you not understand?
you have 2-3 months to perform 5 taps on your screen.
What is the point of this? How exactly would Apple, or any other platform, know if a user was over a certain age? Should they implement the fool-proof birth date prompt? How else would they know for sure? The best way is for someone to make those decisions for the children — their parents.
Because there was considerable policy debate on how to do this and not scan your emails, cloud files etc? It's great that google is scanning digital assets left, right and center as well as up and down. At least Apple seems to be striking a balance between privacy and protecting the children.
However, apps that haven't been properly reviewed, with an incorrect age rating would slip through the system.
Apple grants almost all requests for data. And that’s just what they admit to in their transparency reports. So Apple having the keys is as good as there being no keys.
So what? Tons of apps have "send diagnostica data" or other options the developer thinks are best on by default when you install them. Just turn the option off. We're all adults here and capable of setting up our iPhones the way we want. No one's holding a gun to our heads to keep iCloud photos on.
No, the point of the encryption is to keep hackers from your files. Apple has always been up front about the fact that they can access your files for purposes of investigation or request from other agencies (see iCloud legal agreement section V. E.). If people were under the impression that Apple couldn't access or hand over their account data or content, then they didn't due their due diligence to educate themselves if that was a concern for them. So if you have extremely sensitive data in iCloud, I'd suggest you store and back it up locally instead.
IMHO ratings should be advisory and the ultimate decision whether content can be accessible to a minor should belong exclusively to that minor's guardian. If a 14 years old says "I'm 14" and the guardian of said minor says "I'm fine with him/her accessing apps rated higher", Apple should not prevent that.
Guardians of minors have not only the right, but the duty to make these decisions and Apple gives them the tools to enforce whatever policy they want to apply to the minors they are responsible for.
What part of spying do you not understand?
That is enabled by default.
Installing an app versus an OS level default setting are not the same. 😓
Is there any particular reason why Apple does not implement controls on AppStore purchases when an Apple ID holder explicitly declares his/her age as 14 and tries to purchase an app meant for 17+ years? What exactly is the point of asking for age when creating an Apple ID then? Why should parents or a guardian turn on some control to restrict these purchases? What steps does Apple take to ensure that 17- children do not download apps that are meant for 17+? Why does it take 30% cut when it cannot implement this basic thing that affects a child's safety but wants to install scanning mechanism on billions of phones to catch (really) 0.0001% (made up percentage) of pedophiles? Is it because it does not care who purchases the app as long as it gets its 30% cut?
Who cares if it's something within an OS or an app? The principle is the same. And it's not even an OS-level default setting either, really. You still have to sign into iCloud before anything is turned on. It should be common sense to set that up how you want it for each device, and anyone who's concerned about this obviously will.
Did you know back then, the App Store rating system was different? You could have an app rated 12+ for "frequent/intense" realistic violence, which they revamped in 2014, which caused apps to that were rated 9+ to be 12+ and so on.
They revamped the ratings system three times. The second time was in 2019, where they made "frequent/intense" simulated gambling (this is the only category where frequent/intense is more common but neither made any difference) to be 17+ which originally it was 12+. Then they revamped it again this year but focused on gambling/contests.
They used to have a warning when you tried to download a 17+ app, but they deleted it (doesn't exist anymore) which unsurprisingly most of the 17+ apps were just web browsers with "unrestricted web access". I know how the App Store works so games being rated 9+ or 12+ isn't that surprising to me.
They revamped the ratings system three times. The second time was in 2019, where they made "frequent/intense" simulated gambling (this is the only category where frequent/intense is more common but neither made any difference) to be 17+ which originally it was 12+. Then they revamped it again this year but focused on gambling/contests.
They used to have a warning when you tried to download a 17+ app, but they deleted it (doesn't exist anymore) which unsurprisingly most of the 17+ apps were just web browsers with "unrestricted web access". I know how the App Store works so games being rated 9+ or 12+ isn't that surprising to me.
Parental controls are like the locks on your house: functional, but not flawless. They encourage honesty, but the determined few will quickly defeat the mechanism.
The parental controls are good for preventing accidental downloads or purchases, but a healthy relationship and consistent discipline are what drive desired behavior. As your kids mature, an excuse such as “because I said so” should transition into an age-appropriate explanation: ”the things you consume shape your mind and thoughts - I’m trying to help you set healthy patterns and understand that not every idea, image, or video is necessarily wholesome to your well being.” Besides a frustrated expression or eye-rolling, hopefully they are asking you “Why?“, which is your big opportunity to impart some wisdom
The parental controls are good for preventing accidental downloads or purchases, but a healthy relationship and consistent discipline are what drive desired behavior. As your kids mature, an excuse such as “because I said so” should transition into an age-appropriate explanation: ”the things you consume shape your mind and thoughts - I’m trying to help you set healthy patterns and understand that not every idea, image, or video is necessarily wholesome to your well being.” Besides a frustrated expression or eye-rolling, hopefully they are asking you “Why?“, which is your big opportunity to impart some wisdom
You're right! Apple blocking apps that Apple (or the law) says are for people at least a certain age using the age given to Apple is WAY TOO HIGH a bar for Apple. I mean how would you even program such a thing into the app store?
So this investigative group sets up an Apple ID, puts a credit card on it, doesn’t enable parental controls, and makes up an imaginary 14yo to create this shockingly stupid story. Its so funny but it’s also really sad and desperate. Probably the same morons behind CSAM scanning.
Right... Apple, one of the most successful companies in the world, would have no idea, not even a clue how to implement that. Seriously? It would be pretty simple, just takes a modicum of imagination to do that undetected.
But the real question should be, what would Apple do with all that personal information/data/photos harvested from its 1+ billion active customers owning phones?
Agreeing !!! As far as I can tell, if parental controls are activated all of this is bunk. This group simply expected that setting the age enabled all parental controls. Not under 18 don't have any kids so cannot validate. There was an expectation that age alone would enable the parental controls. Lots of good reasons for someone under 18 to be accessing content that is rated 17+ but not "adult content".
Photos have been getting scanned on Apple devices for years to identify people. How can you tell that an additional hash is getting created? Not to mention that Apple built the CPU and NPU and could hide usage from any monitoring tools.