Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
watchOS 11 Rumored to Drop Support for Apple Watch Series 4
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Please explain how that's competition, if it was competition, Apple would be motivated to increase the years of support to compete with their competitors........they have not done so in the history of Windows vs Mac existence.
Whether Google or or Samsung have "done it" yet is irrelevant - it will happen. Manufacturers running Android such as Google and Samsung among others make top notch devices, I used my first smartphone - Galaxy S4 for 5 years before upgrading to a Galaxy S9+, which i used for over 5 years and am actually still using as a secondary phone going on almost 7 years behind my now primary iPhone 13.
Absolutely zero issue with product longevity.
Windows is largely backward compatible going back decades and previous iterations of Windows have been supported for many more years than any iteration of Mac.
Sure, we can say talk is cheap, but i think that's bad faith argument to suggest Google and Samsung is going to walk back their support commitments. And yes I know Google has a wonky history with new products but this is different.
The average years of support for various Apple products is what 5 years? Maybe 6 at best.
No such thing as unplanned obsolescence in the case of software and security support. There can certainly be unplanned product obsolescence in such cases of uncompetitive or unpopular products but it's clearly a choice to drop support for devices at a software/security level.
problem with all the apple watch is no AI in the age of AI but if u dont care about health and fitness then it doesnt matter.
AI on watches is being used to lose weight better then ozempic. i am 30lbs lighter since dec
catch cancer yrs b4 it becomes fatal
fitness coach using chatbot
apple and even samsung have been wasting time on microled which doesnt even matter
AI on watches is being used to lose weight better then ozempic. i am 30lbs lighter since dec
catch cancer yrs b4 it becomes fatal
fitness coach using chatbot
apple and even samsung have been wasting time on microled which doesnt even matter
long updates r useless unless u have replaceable batteries and EU will soon force this on all phones.
another thing is iphone cameras get zero yrs of update camera is clearly the most important thing . and iphone camera ages very very badly i know coz i am contantly taking the best pics
The fact it’s connected to your smart phone that has all of your data, payments, emails, and more via Bluetooth… I’d say pretty important.
I'm not sure how you define support. I have a bunch of XP instances that work, but saying that they're supported is stretching it.
Likewise vendors may update their drivers. Is that considered "support?"
And having worked in the enterprise space for many years, I'd dispute the "largely backwards compatible going back decades."
Apple dropping support just means no more newer features that comes with newer OS versions. Everything you currently use should keep working for years to come and Apple will keep releasing security fixes for them.
Shorter battery life and slowdown. I have the 4 and plan to replace it with the 14.
Except, they dont need to “ending support after 2 years”. They just don’t shovel a barrage of new features onto old devices, knowing full well it won’t run, thus via no-downgrade update, ruining the device in the process.
Also, people WANT a working device, NOT necessarily the latest software. There has been countless complaints on this site alone blaming Apple for ruining their otherwise working fine device via software update.
As someone points out, Apple doesn’t earn money through software update, but through hardware sales. Hence my suggestion will never eventuate, even if they can offer just the same length of support As before.
it's a wrong comparison. macOS releases every year. windows doesn't.
Six years of software updates is unprecedented in the smartwatch industry. Keep this mind before whining about planned obsolescence and nefarious Apple doing nefarious things.
have no idea what your argument is here.
2 years of updates would drive more device sales over 5 years of updates. you're arguing 5 years of updates is done to drive more sales when really 2 years of updates would do more, yet Apple chose the former which yields less device updates.
2 years would have been in line with other Android devices before competition forced Android companies to provide more years of updates.
people also get upset because for some reason they get trapped into the notion that they're being "forced" to update.
....like your devices still work fine...with features they launched with, including features added in later software updates.
there's going to be an uproar when the watch design ditches the current bands. no one *needs* to upgrade just for new bands, but they'll act cheated anyway.
Your definition of update is different from what My definition is. My original argument is they don’t release new features to existing watches 2-3 years after the initial release, but continue to provide bug fixes and security updates for another 2-3 years, still 5-6 years of software support but make old devices more useable.
You on the other hand consider current model of shoving new features to everyone regardless of the generation of the device as ”proper software support to supported devices” which I am against.
Given they’ve just introduced this feature I think it’s very unlikely.
I would however like full screen widgets you can flick between with the crown rather than the tiny ones we have at present.
Are you really trying to get into semantics - that's your effort to undermine my argument? Give me a single example of where Mac is supported for more years than Windows.
What does drivers have to do with this? We are talking about MacOS vs Windows here, not drivers for hardware.
Dispute backward compatibility on what grounds?
Mac release schedule doesn't refute my point or diminish it in anyway, and saying it's a "wrong comparison" isn't a valid argument.
I still don't understand. they do release new features after 3 years of existing watches. Series 4 got offline maps for example and that was after 3 years.
Or are you saying Series 4 shouldn't get offline maps? If so, that's a ridiculous argument. People are already angry that they can't get 80% battery limit feature on their iPhone 14 and now they have to upgrade to iPhone 15 to get that feature which works against your argument.