Rofl how originally hilarious that THAT would be the first comment. Pat your self on the back.
But regardless of how the picture looks I still push 8 plates on hack squats, 16 on leg press & squat 320 x 4.
Thanks for playing though.
U mad bro?
Rofl how originally hilarious that THAT would be the first comment. Pat your self on the back.
But regardless of how the picture looks I still push 8 plates on hack squats, 16 on leg press & squat 320 x 4.
Thanks for playing though.
Weight training is anaerobic. You can't calculate (or accurately estimate) caloric burn or perceived effort based on HR.How accurate is "Other" for weightlifting (the usual, like squats, bench, deadlifts, etc)
Do you guys use "Other" in the workout app for lifting weights at the gym since the other workouts are all cardio?
How accurate is that? How does the watch calculate calories? By heart rate or movement?
This is my workout for today. I did a quick legs workout in this instance.. Some squats and a few machines. What do you guys think?
Is bluetooth chest heart monitor worth getting for more accurate calorie estimate?
Yes. I use the 'Other' setting on my AW when working out with weights.
No I don't think it's very accurate. I also use a heart rate strap, and the Polar Beat app, set to 'Strength Training'. The AW calorie total is usually around half that on the Polar Beat app. As the Polar Beat app has a dedicated setting for strength training, I prefer its figures.
I do think chest straps provide more accurate heart rate data, especially for strength training, not least because as your wrist flexes under load readings seem to be affected.
I've also noticed that AW heart readings and chest strap heart readings do not match that closely.
Completely agree but I will add that if you are doing HIIT weight lifting, the heart rate is definitely related to effort. The faster you go and more reps, the higher your heart rate will be.Worth repeating, weight training is primarily anaerobic. When anaerobic the HR has little to almost no correlation to effort or caloric burn. So using a HR monitor is just for personal information only and is in NO way an accurate method to calculate effort or caloric burn.
Yes, but while it is correlated in HIIT it is still not accurate since HIIT is a combination of cardio and anaerobic activity.Completely agree but I will add that if you are doing HIIT weight lifting, the heart rate is definitely related to effort. The faster you go and more reps, the higher your heart rate will be.
Also, larger muscle groups under heavy load will have a direct relationship to heart rate. 4x10 of deep squats under heavy load will shoot your heart rate way up.
However, your assessment is generally correct because of what you wrote.
Definitely true. The really isn't an option on the watch or really any device to track weightlifting. I always use other but understand the accuracy is off. Maybe with all the exercise and fitness hires Apple did the past year they make have a workout weightlifting that is closer to accurate. Who knows.Yes, but while it is correlated in HIIT it is still not accurate since HIIT is a combination of cardio and anaerobic activity.
Also while anaerobic exertion can elevate HR (and BP) it is still impossible to write algorithms that can translate that directly to a caloric burn rate.
My best advice is to be in the gym longer then 34 minutes..
Like, what can somebody really accomplish in 34 minutes at the gym?! A warm up alone should be 5-10 minutes.
I weight train 5x a week and I just set it to Other/Open and let her run. Have been doing this since launch day. Average about 45 to 50 minutes and 275 total kcal, with average HR in the 80-90 range.
HR can be all over the map since when you have weight on your hand and writs your arteries constrict. This throws the optical sensor off and often get reading in the 40/50 range. For instance this morning was doing single cable bi curls and when I finished with my left it said 48BPM. However when I finished my right it was 115BPM.
While measuring metrics in lifting can be tricky it is just nice to have a base measurement and get credit for Exercise and Move calories.
Quite a lot if you know what you are doingMy best advice is to be in the gym longer then 34 minutes..
Like, what can somebody really accomplish in 34 minutes at the gym?! A warm up alone should be 5-10 minutes.
If you're doing the right workout, you don't need more than 30 minutes.
I've never worked out more than 45 minutes and am 5'9 187 lbs with 6.5% body fat. If you know what you're doing and aren't screwing around you don't need more than 30 minutes. It's all about super sets and good form.
Is lifting more a goal for most users — or is weight lifting more of a strengthening and conditioning exercise?
If I did go forward with an app — I would use probably a lot of people on this thread for TestFlights.
I've never worked out more than 45 minutes and am 5'9 187 lbs with 6.5% body fat. If you know what you're doing and aren't screwing around you don't need more than 30 minutes. It's all about super sets and good form.
OK but I'm a little older and primarily a running however I do weight train 5x a week.Dude, you gotta post a pic of your physique now brah.
Looking good man.OK but I'm a little older and primarily a running however I do weight train 5x a week.
![]()
Not sure what your question is.does polar beat work when you're not using a polar HR monitor?