You're making some broad sweeping generalizations that you might want to think about. Fastest? cmd-t for a new tab. close? cmd-t replace terminal with iterm or iterm2.Well maybe thats the problem right there. The dock functions exactly like the taskbar in windows except it doesn't show you the windows of a certain app when you hover over it and middle clicking on the icon or windows (it doesn't show any windows so you can't click anyway) does nothing. Neither does middle clicking anything in MC. This is one of those things that makes OS X less productive than windows cause you need to take more steps do certain things and I have encountered this in basically every operation except spotlight.
And I asked about these things before I bought the mbp. I asked mac users how they would quickly open or close tabs in a browser and I was surprised by the responses I got. People told me to just aim for the X to close a tab, right click a link and then select "open in new tab" or select the tab and then press CMD+W. Well this is NOT the fastest way to open/close tabs!!! The fastest way is to configure BTT to allow middle mouse button and then hover over links tabs and use the middle mouse gesture. You need to go to voice or thoughts controls to be faster than that. Neither of those technologies exists.
It's like mac users just don't know about better and faster methods to do certain things. They are perfectly happy using their old proven methods because it just works and then they recommend those methods to me because it works for them.
Likewise, there are hotkeys for most things, browsers and other apps included, and many are configurable.
You're trying to lump together every Mac/OSX user, and that's a bad mistake. You'll wind up with people who just "want their computer to work" and like OSX, but use nothing but an Apple trackpad, people who live and breathe Aperature, CS5, CAD, musicians, engineers, developers, and everywhere in between.
Ok, then return it.surjavarman said:I checked both of these before I purchased it. I was satisfied with the screen at that time but now I am not. My opinion changed. My thinkpad has a higher pixel density, a better range of colors and the technology of the screen is superior. You wouldn't know it until you do a side by side comparison. The screen is probably the reason I want to upgrade to any mac that just has a better display. As far as OSes goes. I was neutral about it both windows and os x before the purchase and I am pretty neutral now. Its difficult to tell which one I favor right now. Ideally I'd liked to use W7 with the improved airplay of OS X.
surjavarman said:The sole reason I went for the MBP was its aluminum unibody. That was the absolute decisive factor.
And there is likely the big problem - you buy a computer caring what other people think, or thinking it will impress someone. Wait 10 years; you'll get over it. ;D Of course, if the only reason you bought the MBP is for the chassis, well, you've got it, so there should be no problems, right? run Win7 on it if you'd like and be done with it. Eventually people grow out of the virtual appendage and benchmarks comparison, and care about whether or not the computer (or OS, or software) does what they want or need it to do.
As a long-time software engineer and sysadmin, and before that gamer, it used to be "fun" to get the latest and greatest, overclock, etc. - but it's short lived, unless you really like throwing cash away and increasing frustration levels, or it's simply as a very $$ hobby. I've run (as a desktop/laptop), replaced servers with, and written code for Linux since before most knew what it was (~1993 or so). For my work as well as hobby, Windows offers little besides games, except when I need to test my software on it, but I'd much prefer a Linux workstation, or an OSX one, over running Windows for virtually any kind of software development, scripting, etc. OSX isn't perfect; in some respects, to me, they took a perfectly good Unix and broke parts of it, but in general most things "just work" that I expect to with a minimum of hassle, and I have the majority of *nix tools available easily via Macports, plus can always dual boot into Linux, or fire up a VM for Windows. I do wish someone with some sanity and UI experience would re-work the Skype OSx client, though!
So why a mbp? With Leopard onwards, the core OS has few enough parts that suck vs Linux, most things just work, including tools I need for work, a sane coding, scripting, dev, and troubleshooting platform that Windows just can't provide well, so that it's become my "most days" core OS. I'm not fond of the "Apple premium," but in general they're reasonably well made machines, and at least at the time new models are announced, they're not too far off price-wise from similar systems. I don't particularly like their habit of forcing "upgrades" such as going with a 15" Pro over the former MB 13" and now 13" MBP to get a discrete graphics processor, and loathe the loss of the expresscard slot on anything but the 17" MBP, but overall, they're not bad, if you can stomach the "premium" you're paying to run OSX. I've had plenty of Vaios, Dells, and other laptops crap out within 6-24 months, which tends to totally derail whatever I'm working on for some time until it's fixed, while I've thankfully yet to have a MB or MBP die on me. I'm not crazy over the temps on the 2011 i7 MBPs, but - we'll see. Buy whatever it is that makes you happy, lets you do what you want or have to, and then don't look back - there will always be something newer and shinier around the corner, and you'll just drive yourself nuts.
To finish up the "why," I'm in and out of the office, travel, work from home, so I generally use my laptops as a portable desktop replacement. Multiple VMs, eclipse and various dev tools, lots of other things open at once, and an occasional game here and there. I can't afford for my primary system to be down, nor to be "arguing" through a painful upgrade - I keep my systems at least 3 years, and they'll see max CPU usage quite often. So far, I've lost a superdrive (everyone has, right?) and USB went flaky on a MB, while a dual G4 tower kept plugging along, as well as a pair of MBPs without issue. My "next best" option would probably be a Thinkpad, assuming I convinced myself that Lenovo continued the relatively good IBM build quality, and either hackintosh or running Linux. It might not be "shiny and the newest specs," and even if it is, it's not 6 months later, but again, it's about actually getting things done, unless you really have no work or anything of importance to do, at which point I'll assume you have a trust fund or parents who spoil you, then do whatever you'd like.
Last edited: