Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
截屏2023-01-02 上午9.34.42.png

revise iPad lineup
截屏2023-01-01 下午10.55.04.png

Revise iPhone lineup
 
Yes and what a smart way to convince people to switch to Apple hardware. "Look how s****y the software we built runs on other platforms! Now, please go spend 2x-3x compared to what you paid for your PC on some of our hardware instead, so you can see how it runs on there."

Apple is foolish not to make the experience better for everyone; it's more revenue they could be receiving for a product that doesn't even require manufacturing something physical.
It's simply business. Majority of Apple's revenue comes from selling hardware. So the business goals will still to attract people to buy their hardware.

There are some improvements though, like having Apple Music available on Android, Apple TV+ on Android TV, and even allowing Microsoft to have iCloud Photos syncing with Windows Photos app. Small steps, but you get the gist.
 
What I would like from Apple is a more aggressive security update policy. All extant vulnerablities should be squashed for three years after the base OS has moved on. In other words Monterey should have security updates through the end of 2025.

If you bought a 2014 Mac mini in the spring of 2018 it runs out of support in 2024, after only six years of use which seems a little short.

Given how easy it was to get Monterey running on a 2010 Mac Pro Apple is giving up pretty easy on support of old hardware. You would think they were a hardware company or something. 😉

Oh well, the Mint Linux XCFE 21.1 runs quite well on a 2012 mini, and that is supported until 2027. We'll see if I can get 15 years out the little box.
 
iPhone SE4 the size of a mini with USB-C, no OLED screen (due to PWM), better antenna and keep the SIM tray (as we use it), a lighter, smaller MacBook Air, simplified Podcast app
 
Wow. 8 pages of comments and only one guy wants a VR headset. That’s telling. Reading this thread, the take-away is obvious. Customers aren’t happy with Apple’s quality control these days.
That would be me, yes.
I think the answer as to why only few people want it is because there is a lack of imagination.
In my head I already know the design and input methods needed for it to be extremely successful, not just for professionals, but for everybody that today use a computer.
My only hope is that Apple will release roughly what I have in mind, and not something similar to what we have witnessed so far, cuz then in that case the majority of people would be right into thinking it's no use.
 
- Thunderbolt 5 via USB-C across all iPhone, iPad and Mac devices
- USB-C charging across all Apple and Beats-branded accessories
- An updated Magic Mouse with the charging port at the “nose” instead of on the “belly”
- Simple multi-user support on iPads
- More seamless ways to let guests beam music to speakers in my HomeKit home without adding them to the home
- iTunes Store integration with Letterboxd so it’s easy to find movies on my watchlist to watch or hide movies I’ve already seen
 
  • Like
Reactions: HobeSoundDarryl
make Photos.app use less space for caches: less than half of my photos library is my photos, the rest is different scaled and cropped versions, and since I have a reasonably fast processor and fast disk access, but don’t have a lot of storage space, I’d rather just have the key photos cached and regenerate the rest on demand.
There is a good idea. Photos is such a disk hog I don't even use it. Your notion would fix it. When you have the picture the way you want it there should be a "reclaim cache" button. Keep the original and the final version and delete every intermediate version. There could even be a 'replay edit script' function so you could repeat the work you did later step by step until you get to the part you want to do differently.

Thinking about it a little more computers have reversed themselves. iPhoto came out when CPUs were slower but hard drives were big (2012 Mac mini came with a 500 GB drive), so saving everything to avoid duplicating work made sense. With the M1 it's reversed. The CPU is very fast but SSD space is limited. So using the CPU to redo work is better than using SSD space on intermediate pictures you may never want again.

Edit, I looked up the numbers, my bottom end MacBook Air has a CPU that is six times faster than the one in the 2012 Mini. But is has only half the storage space, albeit much faster storage space. So yes a reallocation of resources is indicated.
 
Last edited:
A new G4 Cube type design for the next Mac Studio including more reasonably priced and smaller matching Studio Display.
 
I’d ask for bug-free software and lower prices… but I have a better chance of asking and receiving a unicorn for my daughter.
Apple just lost a 💰 trillion-dollar worth of market value in 2022. No way they are thinking or considering lower the prices down.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.