Why do people go on about how droolworthy their phone looks and then immediately slap on a big 'ol case on it. Honestly. Why do people even care how a phone looks anymore? Majority of people have bumpers, barely there cases, or full armor cases on their phones. Even a bumper completely takes away from the design of a phone. If you think it doesn't, then how would you like the iphone to have that bumper as a permanent fixture? Why design a phone that will shatter with one accidental drop? Why design a phone that just screams for a case. Bottom Line: ITS A MOBILE DEVICE!!! Don't design a phone thinking it will never be dropped. You have drop tests for a reason. Can you imagine if cars were designed in a way where the designers were so full of themselves, that they felt the buyer who got into a fender bender was some idiot who didn't take proper care when using their car? Apple get off your high horse, and produce an iPhone that will pass a drop test. The competition has already passed you in performance, and now they have caught up in design and ability to pass drop tests without shattering their screens.
Detrimental? The case enhances the UX.
There has yet to be any phone released that has beaten the iPhone 4S in any CPU/GPU benchmark. This is an indisputable fact and been discussed here quite a few times. Considering the iPhone 4S was released 6+ months ago, can you explain why you say the competition has passed Apple in performance?
The Android browser has beaten iPhone Safari in some JavaScript tests, if that's what you're basing your conclusions on, your interpretation is incorrect. Winning in a Browser JavaScript test does not mean the CPU/GPU of that machine is faster.
This isnt a scientific reply but benchmarks are one thing and real world performance is something else.
I'm at Uni and I have a SGS2 and two other guys have 4s's. It isn't even up for dispute, the SGS2 is a quicker device, and a fair bit older.
I've used the SGS2 multiple times and have never seen it not lag in normal usage, or play the type of games I've seen on the iPhone. We went to a news site and tried to play a video, it played immediately on the iPhone (html5) while the flash capabilities on the SGS2 took over a minute to load up the video, which then played at 1 frame per second.
That test should have performed equally on both devices, as they both have the ability to play html5 video, but for whatever reason the flash version popped up instead.
Now if I walked away from that thinking "SGS2 can't play videos at more than 1fps" I would have been incorrect.
What test did you perform with your two friends? Were the iPhones jailbroken with multiple background customizations running? If you loaded a web page while in a strong 4G area, while the iPhones were on 3G, then yes it should have loaded faster. But once the page loaded, how smooth was the scrolling and zooming? If scrolling was smooth on the SGS2, was it a page full of text, or something with a lot of graphics and elements to move around?
If you define "quicker" by, "The web page loaded up 5 seconds faster because I'm on 4G, but once loaded I spent the next 5 minutes reading the page with choppy scrolling and low frame rate videos." - that wouldn't be a better experience for me.
That's the power of benchmarks, it takes away the inconsistency of anecdotal evidence and puts both devices on a level playing field. And when it comes to benchmarks, no other phone beats the iPhone 4S.
I know I'm going to be hated for saying this but I'm with the OP here. The iPhone is made out as a great piece of design but by producing the bumpers and packaging them with cleaning cloths Apple is really admitting that the design is flawed. I personally think that both iphone and ipad could be improved (as much as I love them) as they always look smeary with fingerprints and I know more people who have dropped and smashed an iphone than all other phones put together. As a display piece they are beautiful but in practical use they need some work.
See, that's where personal experience has little value. I see NO one with cases other than iPhone, and I'd guess that the percentage of cased iPhones far out weights the others, put together.Sorry but your logic along with the OP's is flawed as I see most people with a case on their phone despite manufacturer. So by your logic all phones designs are flawed because they have cases that can be put on them... and ALL phone producers believe their design is flawed. See what I'm getting at there? Simply because people decide to put a case on their phone does not mean the manufacturer believes their design is flawed OR that it is flawed.
I use a black iPhone bumper on mine, but no case. The bumper at least reduces chance of the camera lens getting scratched. But I agree, slapping a big ugly case on iPhone or any other detracts from the workmanship. The phone are marketed for beauty, show the phone being utilized without a case and it never featured with one on. Yet, when you purchase one they push hard for cases during the sale. Yes, I realize reps get commission and that is their motive for that and screen protecters, etc. But still, customers buy into it and the case gets slapped on. What a crime.
Why do people worry so much about what others do with their stuff? Honestly.Why do people go on about how droolworthy their phone looks and then immediately slap on a big 'ol case on it. Honestly.
You don't see the irony of your own statement? Plenty of people with devices other than iPhones use cases. As you stated, personal experience has little value. More accurate would be "What any one person has experienced has no statistical significance". Don't assume that you can extrapolate trends based solely on your own experience. If you'd care to offer citations (based on statistically significant samples) that back up your assertions, on the other hand...See, that's where personal experience has little value. I see NO one with cases other than iPhone, and I'd guess that the percentage of cased iPhones far out weights the others, put together.
Matter of opinion. That is why I said it's detrimental "to me"- I personally find most cases to be uncomfortable and increase the thickness by an unreasonable amount.
I was merely explaining my rationale for going without a case despite the risk
Then don't get an Otterbox lol.
It's nuts to not have some sort of case on it. I have an Incipio case that provides pretty solid protection without being bulky at all, and contributes to the "blacked out" look.
The people that say I don't use a case because I'm careful are the same TYPE of people that used to say, "I don't wear a seatbelt because I'm careful, I've never been in an accident." or "I don't wear a helmet, because I'm careful, I've never been in an accident." To them I say, who gives a shlt.
People wear seat belts and helmets, not because their bad drivers or riders, but because they know accidents happen. It's not being paranoid, it's being safe and protecting yourself. Accidents happen, and no matter how careful you are with your phone, it can get dropped in some way.
Honestly, I don't want an argument, but websites over our (very good) university wifi are quicker on the SGS2 and I reckon about 80% of the same applications on both phones loaded up quicker on the SGS2.
The flash thing is nonsense by the way because the SGS2 makes a mockery of the whole "flash crashes and is a massive CPU hog" argument. In my experience, the phones still runs buttery smooth when palying flash videos and at a very consistent, quick frame rate. I really haven't ever seen what you've just reported for a second. oh, and you could have turned flash off if you didn't want it