I have the Topping D10s DAC (USB) which I currently use daily with my 2011 iMac. I have tested it successfully with my Cube too. 👍
I haven't had time to put SSD in my DLSD, but MorphOS is the next step.
I have the Topping D10s DAC (USB) which I currently use daily with my 2011 iMac. I have tested it successfully with my Cube too. 👍
I have the Topping D10s DAC (USB) which I currently use daily with my 2011 iMac. I have tested it successfully with my Cube too. 👍
I think no. And it's not open source.
On x86_64 the GUI app is fixed now. Will try on powerpc today (possibly it will, since yesterday it was launching, but crashing; hopefully I have fixed the bug now).
View attachment 2521578
That’s exactly why I wrote “If they open-source the older code”.
Odd question but would you (or anyone) happen to know of a good cheap DAC or audio card for a pcie G5?PM G4 1.25DP MDD FW800:
I installed an USB 2.0 card, a Soundblaster Audigy 2 and an exit fan. Happy to report that the USB card works, at least Soundblasters Firewire seems to pass music through (didn't have analog connection speakers to test so I tested with the Lacie FW-speakers) and the exit fan doesn't seem make the machine any louder IMO.
View attachment 2521391
Odd question but would you (or anyone) happen to know of a good cheap DAC or audio card for a pcie G5?
Yes, but the PM optical might be limited to 96KHz while USB usually supports higher sampling rates (192 or even 384KHz). Can you hear it? Maybe, it depends...but on principle if one has the optical and USB to choose from I choose USB for better potential quality. To take full advantage of this one would need high res source material though.BTW, the easiest way to isolate the DAC from the computer is to use optical connection – conveniently, PowerMac has an optical out. Just get a decent toslink cable.
Yes, but the PM optical might be limited to 96KHz while USB usually supports higher sampling rates (192 or even 384KHz). Can you hear it? Maybe, it depends...but on principle if one has the optical and USB to choose from I choose USB for better potential quality. To take full advantage of this one would need high res source material though.
Yes, but the PM optical might be limited to 96KHz while USB usually supports higher sampling rates (192 or even 384KHz).
Can you hear it? Maybe, it depends...but on principle if one has the optical and USB to choose from I choose USB for better potential quality. To take full advantage of this one would need high res source material though.