As someone who would be willing to say that they do indeed game from time to time, I would have to say that PowerPC OSX isn't really the best way to do it. Mac OS 9 is a much more fun target, as it covers basically all of the 90's in Mac gaming, which is where most of the real excitement was, and surprising chunk of the 80's, and it really seems like you can get Intel powered laptops that can run PowerPC OSX games faster through Rosetta than the fasted G5 desktops. Not to mention, a lot of those games tend to have x86 versions available. Or, they have Windows versions that can be convinced to run on Intel Mac one way or another.And I’ve never been a gamer, so graphics-intensive stuff, like vector drawing and refresh, probably isn’t what you might expect if running Leopard.
Oh!!There have been a number of improvements and swapped-pout stuff to make it run more smoothly, but I would recommend to try using Build 10A96 as a starting point. There are a couple of folks who’ve continued to work with Build 10A190 to make that version run with more stability. My own volunteering has been focussed on getting 10A96 to run more smoothly.
That said, when the project became known last year, a lot of folks instinctively, in the spirit of “newer == better”, went for the 10A190 build — either via installer or that image of an installed system posted online — and left disappointed after finding a number of stability and functionality problems. Build 10A96 is, fundamentally, a better place to start experimenting for the simple reason that fewer PowerPC-related components were stripped out or missing.
Eventually, the goal is to assemble a routine installer with many of the project’s fixes integrated into the mix (this is the case for both Builds 10A96 and 10A190), so that manually moving those fixes into place has already been taken care of.![]()
Any such service companies in Moscow ?Well, it's me again.
His majesty G5 QUAD somehow started to work again. I've found advice to reset PMU. That was done. Afterwards I've booted ASD & start it. It howls a lot but all finished OK. Thermal calibration also works OK
. Now I've got new Idea what to do with it. I still suspect that something need to be done with coolant system (at least change thermal paste). What stops me - don't have such long screwdrivers nearby. (Still thinking about some service company to do it professionally, for reasonable money.)
As for now - I have now idea. Will seek later, some circumstances keeps this project on holdAny such service companies in Moscow ?
the page for the MaxConnect ide hard disk mounting device (https://www.maxupgrades.com/istore/index.cfm?fuseaction=product.display&Product_ID=149) seems to suggest that it attaches the drive on the original ide bus. so if this page is to be believed, then yes it should take a 2nd drive.Can someone help with a stupid question please?
PM G5 Quad IDE bus. Can it work with 2 drives or it is some special hardware which can operate only with apple's default DVD drives without any options?
So, completed a project. I wasn't pleased with fact that IDE bus is idling after removal of DVD. So I've digged in my spare parts & other hardware and made it work. Assembly is quite cumbersome, but if we'll remember that such setup was never planned...
. (Drives are nothing outstanding, just what I've found with maximum capacity, 250 & 80 Gb.
Currently Leopard sees all 8 HDD's at 3 different buses. (Guys, say that I'm maniac
).
I don't really believe that 1(!) molex can feed such crowd, even PSU itself have 1KWt power.with up to eleven 3.5-inch HDDs
I don't really believe that 1(!) molex can feed such crowd, even PSU itself have 1KWt power.
@B S Magnet
Well, pictures on MaxUpgrades.com forces opinion that ALL drives ARE HDDs. I didn't found any mentions about power supply, only about cables. (I wonder if such thing as "PixLas mod for Mac Pro" exists for G5's.)
The result below gives a comparison of data transfer rates of 8 SATA hard disk drives inside G5 Power Mac (Optical bay drive are running on Auxiliary Power Supply)