Lets just say for the sake of argument, Verizon gets the Iphone in the future. I'm curious as to how many current Iphone/ATT customers would switch.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5G77 Safari/525.20)
Why switch? And it would never happen. Ever. It would mean Apple has to make a new phone designed to work on the CDMA network.
I simply asked the question due to the fact there are a ton of people on this forum bitching about ATT's service. It's just like the title says, What if...
You can't say never.. You never know..
I know a lot of people that are pleased with Verizon's cell coverage (let's face it, that's what it's all about anyway). at&t's doesn't seem to be quite as good, but I honestly haven't lived in an area where it was a problem.
The one thing I do hate about Verizon is all the craptastic UI's they force on you. That alone led me away from them. I'm not saying that Apple would allow that though. In fact, that's one of my favorite things about the iPhone. No at&t logos pasted on it and no at&t UI garbage.
To service Verizon like it has already been mentioned a million times would require a CDMA enable phone. Entire world is using GSM, why would Apple limit themselves or spend additional resources to build both GSM and CDMA enable phone?Being a current Verizon customer, I WOULD BE THRILLED. I love Verizon's service, but I hate that they failed to form an agreement with Apple for the iPhone.
To service Verizon like it has already been mentioned a million times would require a CDMA enable phone. Entire world is using GSM, why would Apple limit themselves or spend additional resources to build both GSM and CDMA enable phone?
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5G77 Safari/525.20)
Why switch? And it would never happen. Ever. It would mean Apple has to make a new phone designed to work on the CDMA network.
Well I would think that with Verizon going to LTE (next-gen GSM technology I believe) in the next year or two or whatever, I could see it possibly happening though I too wish that their prices were cheaper
Hey, if not, buy an AT&T LTE iPhone and unlock it 😉
Well I would think that with Verizon going to LTE (next-gen GSM technology I believe) in the next year or two or whatever, I could see it possibly happening though I too wish that their prices were cheaper
If the iPhone had gone to verizon I wouldn't have switched from AT&T for it...why mess with service that's working?
You mean like how Apple would never switch to Intel on Macs?
To service Verizon like it has already been mentioned a million times would require a CDMA enable phone. Entire world is using GSM, why would Apple limit themselves or spend additional resources to build both GSM and CDMA enable phone?
To service Verizon like it has already been mentioned a million times would require a CDMA enable phone. Entire world is using GSM, why would Apple limit themselves or spend additional resources to build both GSM and CDMA enable phone?
You and I are both industry outsiders, and obviously it isn't a profitable business decision, else Apple would be doing it. This is a dead horse.Having more potential customers won't "limit" Apple.
Apple is capable of making money, while building multiple versions like other phone makers.
Apple already changed radios once, back when they went 3G (W-CDMA).
Apple wanted Verizon to begin with.
You can't own an iPhone with ATT if you live in over 1/3 of the USA, because of no ATT home towers.
About 1/2 of all iPhones are currently sold inside the USA. Adding a Verizon model would surely double American sales, making Verizon 1/3 of the WORLD total.