Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm sitting here, money in my hands, waiting for the M5 Pro/Max since October. Waiting for a new HomePod Mini, a new Apple TV and new AirTags for longer.

Have they become allergic to earning money? RAM prices are not going to get any better. Who knows what madness will come out of the White House next.

I'd really like to spend some money on Apple before the economy collapses or we have another world war and both seem more likely than Apple releasing ANYTHING at the moment. Sorry, but I've been buying exclusively Apple products for 25 years now and I've never been this frustrated with the company.

May I suggest watching this.
 
I'm sitting here, money in my hands, waiting for the M5 Pro/Max since October. Waiting for a new HomePod Mini, a new Apple TV and new AirTags for longer.

Have they become allergic to earning money? RAM prices are not going to get any better. Who knows what madness will come out of the White House next.

I'd really like to spend some money on Apple before the economy collapses or we have another world war and both seem more likely than Apple releasing ANYTHING at the moment. Sorry, but I've been buying exclusively Apple products for 25 years now and I've never been this frustrated with the company.
With the possible exception of the Apple TV you're not going to see any huge performance gains from new hardware. Sitting on your cash waiting for a 10% increase in efficiency over the M4 Max? Just buy now.

Airtags are a waste of money. You can get plenty of quality knockoffs on Amazon for a fraction of the price. I bought my wife 4 in a pack for £18 and they work flawlessly, have a keyfob hole and pair quickly. In this case you're paying loads more just for an Apple logo on it.

If you're waiting for a new AppleTV just for some gaming ability I'd just buy an Xbox Series S which is stupidly overpowered for watching streaming apps on and has a much better selection of games.

A new HomePod won't launch until after WWDC when the new Siri arrives.
 
Here's the thing: When Apple announces availability of an MacBook Pro with the M5 Pro chip, I know that I can buy one and it will work, rock-solid, with every single piece of software I've got. I can run it 24/7 and it will be stable. It won't crash on me.

Apple is an execution powerhouse. If it takes them an extra month or three or six to get it perfect, I'll wait, because that reliability is what I'm paying for, and so are you.
Rock solid my a$$ safari won’t start on my Macbook today for some reason.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Parowdy
The wait for AirTags is worse than the 2016-2020 MacBook disaster for you?

Waaaaaay to undermine your own credibility.

Have you considered that Apple might be cooking up something for their, I don't know, 50th anniversary?
No? Yeah apparently so.

If you're this desperate to give Apple money for AirTags, buy me and my family some.
Now sit back down and wait, just like the rest of us 🙄
 
No but it is Apple's fault that Apple doesn't provide a roadmap or guidance of any sort.
Your take that "it's Apples fault for not providing a roadmap" is soooooo much less relevant now than it ever was. We live in splendid times concerning Apple (hardware) products, and we have a very good idea what's coming (despite their secrecy and the half century anniversay).
Politically we are in unpredictable times now, but you also expect Apple, of all companies, to offer a heads up before they release a product? The actual f
 
  • Love
Reactions: Tagbert
I'm in the same boat. I'm happy with the M5 Pro being delayed, as it means my M4 Pro MBP remains current, longer, but that's very much specific to me. I'm also waiting for an AirTag, Apple TV, and 2 HomePod Minis. And waiting, and waiting...

If there were no rumors that would be one thing, but they rumors have all agreed that they are coming soon. Only, soon has become 6 months at this point. I don't get it either.
We've had rumors about under display Touch ID since before 2017 and under display Face ID since before 2018.
Sorry but its your own fault if you get enthusiastic about rumors and "leaks", and you're the primary target of people that like to ponder bs and shove ads under their catchy article titles.
With Apple, there's nothing "to get". They themselves announced AirPower, Apple Intelligence and a revolutionary new design language that is just as good as anything previously. We've all witnessed them saying one thing and delivering something else, if anything.
But you don't get why some rumors didn't come to fruition? Wow...
Last month Venezuela was a sovereign nation and the US president didn't mark Canada as US territory on a map during a White House meeting.
Maybe you should expect some uncertainty anywhere and everywhere were a top 10 company might loose billions because of some weird policy change.

Sorry, rant over.
 
The one year chip upgrade cycle on Macs is a relatively recent trend and still hasn’t been consistent. M1 -> M2 was over a year. Then M2-M3 was just 9 months.

My guess is that this could be a redesign year with the M5, since we’ve been basically stagnant on the design front since the M1 MBP.
 
It's been 14 months since the M4 Pro/Max came out.

I had to wait 4 years for the 2018 Mini to replace the rubbish 2014 model.

By the time my 2014 MBP was ripe for replacement, I was still waiting for them to make a model with a decent keyboard, that wasn't an oven. And then the rumours of AS started coming in...
You can't possible compare the wait for a new Mac mini during the dark ages of Intel Macs to NEEDING to upgrade from a high end M4 Mac to a high end M5 Mac...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: benwiggy
M5 pro/M5 Max were never expected before spring/early summer as this fits their past release cycles. Homepods are probably delayed because of the AI fiasco (and really, what ifference could a new homepod make, except some functionality that is software-limited to them for exclusivity), same with AppleTV (unless they put a LOT more effort into gaming) and Airtags (to be fair, those could be thinner, rechargeable and have newer UWB-Chio)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
Why should they? So that people can piss and moan when they miss a date because they need a little more time to get it right? No matter how you phrase "guidance", some are going to take it as gospel and complain when it doesn't happen quite that way.

Better to simply not say anything, IMO.
Having both Tesla and Apple products, I can happily say that I prefer Apple's version (minus WWDC 2024) over brash bold claims.
At least no one is waiting for M5 as long as some are waiting for the Roadster. Or 45k Cybertruck. Or 25k sedan. Or being on Mars.
 
I'd be interested in a new Apple TV. Have no real complaints of of my 2022 ATV but would be curious to see some updates to hardware or remote. To be fair, the current ATV remote has come a long way.
 
Lol we didn't need evidence, I knew what he meant 🤣
Sure you did buddy. You of course knew that they meant it simply wouldn’t open.
That’s why you replied to them with your thoughtful, or at least entertaining, comment.
And it was so obvious that you did, that they posted that video simply because they had nothing better to do.
In any case, your sarcasm needs some work, if it truly was.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 8483011
Agreed. [...] witness the one recent time they promised a roadmap, Apple Intelligence. Ouch. Just like you said.
Um, ya. THIS ^^^ Apple Intelligence powered by technology So Advanced it doesn't actually exist 🙃

Backup Plan B: stuff Sam Altman into everything! (OpenAI starts imploding, opinions may vary.)
Backup Plan C: okay, we meant to say: Google Inside!
Backup Plan D: <waiting for Godot>

In retrospect, it may have been better to just shut up and eventually ship something 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
This is pure suicide in the tech world. You will never ever ever see a roadmap from anyone who isn't a parts supplier.
...but companies like Intel, AMD, NVIDIA and Microsoft do share roadmaps of key products (if only to big customers, OEMs and dealers who sign NDAs -it filters down) so people have a reasonable idea of where the PC platform (hardware and software) is going.

The issue is with Apple is that they control all the key components of the hardware and software and can pivot on a dime without any notice. Its maybe not such a big deal for more consumer-focussed products like the MBA or lower-end MBP, but I think there is a particular problem with the pro desktops where they have a dreadful track record of releasing one-and-done products like the trashcan, iMac Pro and 2019 Mac Pro, leaving them to go out of date then going off in some radically different direction with the "successor" that won't necessarily support the same workflow. If you have to spend a year planning/budgeting/writing proposals for a large project that will run for several years, it's rather useful to know that the equipment that you specify in the proposal will still be available in some recognisable form 3 years later if you need replacements or additional seats. Even Apple's position on end-of-life for MacOS versions seems to be a case of guessing based on past performance. E.g. although we know that Tahoe will be the last Intel-compatible MacOS we have to just assume that it will get 3 years support - and nobody really has a clue if there will still be a PCIe Mac Pro this time next year. It would be a very "courageous" move to plan an important project that assumed there will be a drop-in replacement for the current Mac Pro or Studio Ultra for the next 3-4 years.

There's also some debate as to whether the Osborne Effect really happened (even on the Wikipedia page there's a lot more to that story than 'announced the replacement - killed sales'). Meanwhile, Apple are somewhat unusual in how they rarely announce products unless they are either available on day one or have a firm, near-future launch date (the exception being the 2017 Mac Pro crisis where there was obviously blood on the carpet). For the rest of the industry, it's fairly typical for new products to be teased at trade shows and/or not show up for sale for months after they are announced).

Apple doesn't need to make an announcement for people to assume that the M5 MBP announced in October means that M5 Airs and M5 Pro/Max MBPs definitely probably might be coming soon - and even people who don't scour the interwebs for rumors are going to ask why the cheaper MBP is "M5" while the more expensive one is only "M4" - so some "Osbourning" will be happening anyway. I guess Apple are pretty confident that people who delay buying will hold onto their money and not be tempted to spend it on anything else in the meantime...
 
...but companies like Intel, AMD, NVIDIA and Microsoft do share roadmaps of key products (if only to big customers, OEMs and dealers who sign NDAs -it filters down) so people have a reasonable idea of where the PC platform (hardware and software) is going.

The issue is with Apple is that they control all the key components of the hardware and software and can pivot on a dime without any notice. Its maybe not such a big deal for more consumer-focussed products like the MBA or lower-end MBP, but I think there is a particular problem with the pro desktops where they have a dreadful track record of releasing one-and-done products like the trashcan, iMac Pro and 2019 Mac Pro, leaving them to go out of date then going off in some radically different direction with the "successor" that won't necessarily support the same workflow. If you have to spend a year planning/budgeting/writing proposals for a large project that will run for several years, it's rather useful to know that the equipment that you specify in the proposal will still be available in some recognisable form 3 years later if you need replacements or additional seats. Even Apple's position on end-of-life for MacOS versions seems to be a case of guessing based on past performance. E.g. although we know that Tahoe will be the last Intel-compatible MacOS we have to just assume that it will get 3 years support - and nobody really has a clue if there will still be a PCIe Mac Pro this time next year. It would be a very "courageous" move to plan an important project that assumed there will be a drop-in replacement for the current Mac Pro or Studio Ultra for the next 3-4 years.

There's also some debate as to whether the Osborne Effect really happened (even on the Wikipedia page there's a lot more to that story than 'announced the replacement - killed sales'). Meanwhile, Apple are somewhat unusual in how they rarely announce products unless they are either available on day one or have a firm, near-future launch date (the exception being the 2017 Mac Pro crisis where there was obviously blood on the carpet). For the rest of the industry, it's fairly typical for new products to be teased at trade shows and/or not show up for sale for months after they are announced).

Apple doesn't need to make an announcement for people to assume that the M5 MBP announced in October means that M5 Airs and M5 Pro/Max MBPs definitely probably might be coming soon - and even people who don't scour the interwebs for rumors are going to ask why the cheaper MBP is "M5" while the more expensive one is only "M4" - so some "Osbourning" will be happening anyway. I guess Apple are pretty confident that people who delay buying will hold onto their money and not be tempted to spend it on anything else in the meantime...

Every company you named is a parts supplier (Microsoft is a little more nuanced) but those companies are expected to release roadmaps, companies selling a finished end product do not because it's strategic suicide.

Also the Osborne effect is studied in business classes around the world it definitely happened.
 
I don’t believe there is anything overly wrong with Apple. Apple hasn’t promised any new products on a specific date this year. You being upset with Apple doesn’t make sense, OP. Keep saving your money and be patient.
 
Every company you named is a parts supplier

...and so is Apple (Apple Silicon SoCs, MacOS/iOS etc.) - it's just that they only supply parts/OS software to themselves (or commission them from TSMC if you prefer).

Roadmaps from PC parts/software makers tell you a lot about what end-user products are coming and when. Windows end-of-life dates are published years in advance.

Even with Intel Macs you could go onto Intel's Ark website and see "Oh look, the Gen 16 i7 variant with 60W GDP and Iris pro-plus graphics isn't shipping until Q4 so we won't be seing a new i8 MBP until at least then" (made up stats, but there were definitely times when this sort of thing explained the non-appearance of Mac models).

Post-Apple Silicon, Apple's future products (who's features are largely determined by the SoC) are an entirely closed book - the M5 Pro/Max/Ultra SoC could be coming out next week, next fall or never. Effective end-of-life for MacOS Tahoma will come whenever updates stop trickling out... maybe when the last Intel Mac turns vintage/obsolete (or maybe not).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.