mkrishnan said:
This is interesting...I thought that the difference was that the users of one were the guardians of light and purity, and that the users of the other were the minions of the prince of darkness. But I could never remember which one was which. 🙄
Is there a very effective adaptor to get those f/2 Olympus zooms onto a Canon body? Those seem pretty nice, if they give sharp images....
Good glass...is...well, important. I am more and more appreciating that. I took the 50mm f/1.4 off my 300D and put back on the 18-55, and I got home and looked at images in PS, and I was thinking, "Umm ... is this the same camera???" 😱 😀
Those Olympus lenses are designed for use with a 4/3's sensor size, so I don't think they'll translate. Just not designed for the Canon/Nikon image circles.
Kinda crappy for sure.
And yea, those Canon kit lenses are poo. I wonder what this new Nikon 18-55 is gonna be like. Poo as well i'm expecting.
😉
By the time you take EVERYTHING into account, they are both awesome cameras. It comes down to the small things like control layout (I hate that I have to take my eye out of the viewfinder to change some of the settings) and things of that sort. BUT I don't personally like the way Nikon's buttons and controls are laid out. Each has it's own intrinsic little diffferences.
It was funny. This weekend, I worked a baby search (and believe me, it was as fun as it sounds! haha!) and I used Nikon and the other guy there used his 1d mk II. He kept harrassing me about being a Nikon guy and I think he spent too much time worried about my nikon, as most of his images, IMHO, were over exposed. Like, big blown out areas on kids arms and whatnot. White dresses? No details.
Just funny to me that he kept saying "don't buy a d2x yet. Canon has something coming out..."
He was also busy trying to figure out how to make the eMac we were using print. It's like, sure, Canon's are nice, but if you want to sell it to me based off the images you took? Sorry. The photos I took with my Nikon came out nicely exposed, saturated, and sharp as a tack. Every one.
I'm sure I could have done the same with his Canon, and I'm sure he could have overexposed like a banshee with my D2h. But it's a philosophical difference, and he thought, i guess, that his images were better than mine.
I worry about anyone who can't get a printer installed on a Mac, blames the mac, and get's flustered by it. But did I lose faith in Canon gear from this? No. Did I lose faith in a "professional" who's been at this for years? Yes.
All I learned is that, in a pinch, I can be a damn reliable photographer even when shooting something I'm not in the least turned on by and actually probably a little disgusted by (the whole JonBenet factor). And that my knowledge of my system really helped me to excel. And i could have done the same as a Canon user if I was one. But at the end of it all, it did kinda resemble a potential pro-nikon TV spot.
🙂